Theme: Governance

  • I thought it was a display of dissent by a conquered people against an aggressor

    I thought it was a display of dissent by a conquered people against an aggressor over control of the new territories.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-25 19:53:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/614159596798803968

    Reply addressees: @voxdotcom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/614158644092010498


    IN REPLY TO:

    @voxdotcom

    Ken Burns: Confederate flag isn’t about heritage. It’s about resistance to civil rights. http://t.co/wXMj4dNQZw http://t.co/JorwurFH7h

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/614158644092010498

  • Peculiar. I find it really fascinating that libertarians use their own names wit

    Peculiar. I find it really fascinating that libertarians use their own names with utter confidence, while so many conservatives use fake names. I jus strikes me as odd.

    I’ll tell you why: because my board, investors, and management teams have always told me to shut up online. And I have found the opposite to be true: I have a reputation for telling customers the painful truth. And you know, they just like knowing that if they’re paying big bucks for someone’s time and opinion, that they are going to get something unfiltered.

    So if you’re talking truth, just do it. If you talking trash, then I understand. But the question is why should you talk trash if you can talk the truth?

    The truth is enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-24 13:33:00 UTC

  • A couple of quick thoughts on Anissimov’s “book” on the alt right 1) good start

    A couple of quick thoughts on Anissimov’s “book” on the alt right

    1) good start of an empirical analysis of the monarchies. This is a needed bit of work.

    2) good emphasis on exit vs voice.

    I think I am far too far ahead of the alt right movement to really offer much of an opinion.

    Just because something rings true is irrelevant. Evola is irrelevant. Belief is irrelevant.

    Only necessity is relevant.

    If it cannot be embodied in institutions then it means nothing.

    This doesn’t take away from the collection of blog posts.

    But the alt right is still inactionable.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-23 17:45:00 UTC

  • IS PLAYING THE WORLD FOR SUCKERS (OBAMA MOSTLY)

    http://theweek.com/articles/560256/time-real-iran-playing-world-suckersIRAN IS PLAYING THE WORLD FOR SUCKERS (OBAMA MOSTLY)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-23 13:04:00 UTC

  • (reverse-trolling ant-russian rant) That’s why I have time to hang out with you

    (reverse-trolling ant-russian rant)

    That’s why I have time to hang out with you Munchkins for the practical purpose of teaching other people how to counter Russian propaganda constructed on lies and false moral equivalency. 😉 I mean, if you’re talking Russia, it’s pretty hard to find target with a greater record of incompetence. So I feel a little like John Stewart making fun of Bush. It’s too easy. Too much material: The white people who failed (again, and again, and again).

    You wanna keep attacking me (ad hominem fallacy), and it’s ok. I understand that you’re unable to defend Russia rationally, and have to attack me personally. Only people who would engage in false moral equivalency would resort to personal attacks as a means of avoiding the reality of the country that they’re defending.

    But you’re unable to see what’s sitting in front of you. I’m doing exactly what I said I was doing, for exactly the reasons I said. Which is why it doesn’t make sense to you. You can’t imagine someone would spend his time on such a thing. And no one would, unless it was for illustrative purposes.

    Russia is a sick country with a sick populace, and none of us cares as long as that sick country doesn’t try to usual tactic of creating nationalism to cover for its sickness by attacking neighbors. This is the technique used by idiots who lack the competence to run their countries competitively. And that is what Russia does: distract from the local troubles by creating an external demon that does not exist.

    The west’s strategy is to create successful consumer capitalist economies that are constrained from ill actions by the value of international trade. This forces human rights, and prosperity into the world.

    Now, it may be true that the west overextended this approach in the belief that all civilizations (even Islam) are capable of development. And it may be true that the west foolishly advocates democracy rather than consumer capitalism and human rights regardless of means of political organization. And it may be true that the Americans talk about the carrot (use democracy to select the government of your choice) without the stick (if you choose a government that violates the international goal of peaceful commercial cooperation then we will punish you very, very harshly for choosing that government). But that does not distract from the fact that a the general direction that the west has taken the world is to consumer capitalism and human rights. And has dragged humanity out of ignorance poverty and totalitarianism kicking and screaming.

    On the one hand we have a positive influence that makes mistakes (the west) and a negative influence that can’t do anything right at all (Russia), who has a “black-thumb” when it comes to government (everything it touches gets worse).

    Ukraine has had enough of “Russia’s Black Thumb”. We will take the problem of democracy in the midst of prosperity, rather than the problem of Russian corruption in the midst of poverty. That’s not a very hard decision to make. The west is naive but prosperous and fixable. Russia is a collection of hopeless corrupt incompetence that has murdered tens of millions of its own, and untold numbers of its neighbors, and set eastern Europe behind by the centuries it will take to recover.

    I don’t hate anyone. I just state the facts. I love mankind, that’s why I want to save as many as possible from the sick and evil people we call ‘Russians’.

    Cheers.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-23 02:51:00 UTC

  • WELL I GUESS THAT MAKES ME A REACTIONARY –“The Purpose of Reactionary Politics

    WELL I GUESS THAT MAKES ME A REACTIONARY

    –“The Purpose of Reactionary Politics is to End Politics”–

    –Michael Anissimov

    That’s the first definition that is a concrete criteria.

    #NRx


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-22 23:56:00 UTC

  • HAIDT’S PERSPECTIVE ON AMERICAN DIVISIVENESS **I love that man. Really.** I inte

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/01/07/the-top-10-reasons-american-politics-are-worse-than-ever/JOHNATHAN HAIDT’S PERSPECTIVE ON AMERICAN DIVISIVENESS

    **I love that man. Really.** I interpret the data completely differently.

    That difference is because I was there as a very young participant when we made the conservative strategic decision in the 1970’s to produce the conflict that we have today.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-20 23:21:00 UTC

  • THE PAX AMERICANA IS OVER THE STEPPE PEOPLE: RUSSIA AND MUSLIM TERRORISM END THE

    http://news.yahoo.com/poland-says-europes-peaceful-period-now-over-185146755.htmlPOLAND: THE PAX AMERICANA IS OVER THE STEPPE PEOPLE: RUSSIA AND MUSLIM TERRORISM END THE EUROPEAN PEACE


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-19 12:13:00 UTC

  • THE CATHOLICS DID TREMENDOUS DAMAGE —“Ted Kennedy’s ’65 immigration act was “s

    THE CATHOLICS DID TREMENDOUS DAMAGE

    —“Ted Kennedy’s ’65 immigration act was “specifically designed to change the demographics of this country. When it went through, as with Obamacare, surrounded with lies, a miasma of lies: ‘this will not change the demographic of America; we’ll get basically the same people we’ve always gotten.’” But, instead, Coulter asserted, this act “was specifically designed to bring in peasant cultures who would remain poor for generations, remain on government support, so that you would have a solid block of Democratic voters, and it worked.”… “Obama never would have been elected. …. Romney would have won a bigger landslide than Reagan did against Carter in 1980.”— ibid


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-19 06:16:00 UTC

  • among major powers, the United States has not professionalized its diplomacy” wi

    http://www.xenosystems.net/quote-note-169/—“Alone among major powers, the United States has not professionalized its diplomacy” with disastrous consequences,—

    Fukuyama agrees.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-18 11:21:00 UTC