#tcot #nrx #tlot Does your government improve cooperation and exchange, or create conflict and takings? That’s an easy question to answer.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 11:11:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623812707070935040
#tcot #nrx #tlot Does your government improve cooperation and exchange, or create conflict and takings? That’s an easy question to answer.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 11:11:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623812707070935040
#tcot #NRx But why must we persist in a submissive mythos of federation, truth, trust and love, instead of just truth, trust and love?
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 10:12:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623797640082399232
#tcot #NRx Rule of law, and production of commons are two different things. Democracy is a catastrophe because it merges law and commons.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 09:53:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623793047998984192
#tcot #NRx Failing to parent the young, and failing to parent less advanced polities differ only in scale. Aristocracy must parent.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 09:50:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623792318672412672
#tcot #NRx Rule of Law and Contractually Constructed Commons are different things. Rulers can adjudicate while leaving commons to locals.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 09:35:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623788474601181185
Really? What do I think. I think that majority rule is inferior to aristocratic rule. I support freedom of disassociation.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-21 22:54:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623627170435477504
Reply addressees: @johann_theron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623365650635976704
IN REPLY TO:
@johann_theron
@curtdoolittle What the Afrikaner new generation should do.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623365650635976704
(obama killed the presidency. its done. not just american presidency. but all presidency. he’s proven the parliamentary model superior. if FDR didn’t kill it, then Obama did. It’s done.)
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-20 22:38:00 UTC
ALL TRUTH IS NEGATIVE IN GOVERNMENT TOO
The trick for any government is not to do good things. It is not to do bad things. If it’s not bad it must be good. Ascent in the production of commons is illogical.We don’t need to approve contracts for commons. We need only adjudicate them if they create involuntary transfers. Democracy is an inversion of logic. We need juries, not legislatures.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-20 16:40:00 UTC
TEACHING HUMAN HISTORY IS EASY IF…
Statists and Priests love to teach the history of governments to give them legitimacy. But just as mathematics ought to be taught as a sequence of historical problems humans had to overcome, and we would understand it very easily, if we taught human history as the evolution of how our tribes evolved and expanded (now that we can teach it) we would find a very different world that was much easier to understand. And we would be a lot more concerned with peoples than corporate governments.
Human history is not a very long period to cover. It’s a few thousand years. if you study land masses at geologic time, it’s easy to understand. If you study the solar system at galactic time, it’s easy to understand. If you study man at tribal time, it’s easy to understand. If you study technologies at technological time, it’s easy to understand. But if you teach these things all as a cacophony of unrelated events without a surrounding narrative it’s confusing as hell.
Our myths make history seem long, mystical and confusing. But history of man’s evolution once we develop domestication is pretty simple. Before that it’s actually trivial, because it’s such a slow process.
What humanists won’t like is that each wave of increasingly aggressive human wiped out the previous wave of less aggressive people.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-20 08:22:00 UTC
[T]he combination of “Anglo-Saxon” economics (accepting the dynamism of open markets) and of “Anglo-Saxon” politics (governments as seriously responsible–British version–or accountable–Washington version–to their voters) is doubly subversive to the French elite’s entire modus operandi. The “Anglo-Saxons” provide an identity to define oneself against and, in the case of the US, a counterpoint to seek to surpass. (One cannot really say “rival” because the US fails to feel threatened by European unity–indeed, actively promotes it; which is, if anything, even more infuriating.) –Michael Philip