[M]y first draft in 2006, in retrospect, is almost embarrassing. My second draft in 2010, was fairly complete, but when I got to the section where I requried truth telling in government, I’d focused on ‘calculability’ and ‘traceabilty’ as means of preventing abuses of funds, and abuses of the law. My third draft in 2013 still had me stuck with the same problem. I had no idea at the time, that six years of work later, I would have taken that early intuition and turned it into Operationalism as a test not only of truthfulness but of existential possibility. It was another year before I made it through truth. And another year to develop the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowedge, labor and advocacy resulting in the market for commons..
Theme: Governance
-
Reviewing the Last Six Years of Progress on Propertarianism
And while I was pretty sure in 2009 that the solution to government was a market, and I knew strict construction was required, I did not know the philosophical basis for it. I knew that moral intuitions were reducible to property rights, and that variations in moral intuitions reflected the property rights necessary for each reproductive bias. But from today’s vantage point I’ve come very far in the ability to articulate these ideas as necessary, and I am certainly better at communicating them, the fact of the matter is that most of what I have done is improve explanation of why such things are true and necessary. But the original understanding that the solution to the deceit of the 20th century, as the second attempt at mysticism of the west, was truth telling, and that we had to create a market for commons to accommodate the emerging heterogeneous interests of any polity with any sufficiently complex division of perception, cognition, labor and advocacy. I did’nt expect to end up advocating eugenic reproduction. I did not expect the racial differences to be (largely) rates of suppression of the underclasses. I did not expect to come out so strongly in favor of the family. I did not expect to demand a revolution. I viewed my work as libertarian and institutionally progressive yet it is the right that finds my work most interesting (because it proves that their intuitions are correct.) So I will finish The Politics this year, and possibly aesthetics. That means I will write up draft constitutions for various forms of propertarian political orders (honest and truthful regardless of whether collective or libertarian). A few people have asked me to address what I will call personal philosophy, even if I view my work as political and that inspiration is not my job – that’s positivist. My job is preventing deceit and error. So maybe I will do that or not. I will also deal with the DARK SUBJECTS: revolution, and war. But I do not want to do that until last. So that I think will be next year. Hopefully in time for the election. -
REVOLUTION: “THE PLAN” Western Man is moral man, and moral men need: 1 – A Moral
REVOLUTION: “THE PLAN”
Western Man is moral man, and moral men need:
1 – A Moral Justification for the application of Violence to institute change. (They are being lied to, and stolen from, and conquered systematically, and I explain how, why, and how to stop it.) (Ideologies require promise of actionable results within the current lifetime.)
2 – A Solution to Demand: a set of institutional changes (concentration of effort) (an expansion of the classical liberal legal order to suppress lying, wishful thinking, bias and error in matters of the political commons; and a reconstruction of the houses of government as a market for the voluntary construction of commons.)
3 – A means of transition from one order to another. (An ordered means of rapid transformation within the status quo.)
4 – A set of tactics for raising the cost of the status quo: insurrection via: nullification (gradual disempowerment and transition to new government), secession(construction of a new government retaining the previous competitor), revolution (replacement of the people in government and modification of institutions eliminating the previous competitor) and civil war (destruction of the government and replacement with an entirely new one, eliminating the previous competitors).
5 – A set of leaders (speakers) to rally action. (I need 100 people. That’s all. I need only twelve who are very good.) Propertarianism and Testimonialism will be a more complete framework than has been produced before, even if we take into account all of Locke,Hume,Smith and Jefferson as a set.
And if I fail, then the work sits in books and records until someone decides to use it or create something better. But I will have my good service.
One leads a horse to water, but cannot make it drink.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-02 03:13:00 UTC
-
People categorize my work as Reaction because I criticize democracy – via Hoppe
People categorize my work as Reaction because I criticize democracy – via Hoppe.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 09:51:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638650398249742336
Reply addressees: @Outsideness @SanguineEmpiric @MatthewRenauld
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638643403207512065
IN REPLY TO:
@Outsideness
@SanguineEmpiric @curtdoolittle @MatthewRenauld A critique of MM would have earned that ‘obviously’. Not sure response to an HRx post does.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638643403207512065
-
(i) and we need to construct a government of bias-exchanges, not majority assent
(i) and we need to construct a government of bias-exchanges, not majority assent.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-31 11:56:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638319435514781696
Reply addressees: @johann_theron @Outsideness @amerika_blog @AlbertBrenner1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760
IN REPLY TO:
@johann_theron
The cause of SJW behaviour? @Outsideness @amerika_blog @curtdoolittle @AlbertBrenner1 http://t.co/wmxwizk6EY
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760
-
(h) therefore democracy with female participation is dis-utilitarian
(h) therefore democracy with female participation is dis-utilitarian.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-31 11:55:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638319289951461376
Reply addressees: @johann_theron @Outsideness @amerika_blog @AlbertBrenner1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760
IN REPLY TO:
@johann_theron
The cause of SJW behaviour? @Outsideness @amerika_blog @curtdoolittle @AlbertBrenner1 http://t.co/wmxwizk6EY
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760
-
(g) Monopoly democracy makes it impossible for us to trade across the biases
(g) Monopoly democracy makes it impossible for us to trade across the biases.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-31 11:54:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638318990792785924
Reply addressees: @johann_theron @Outsideness @amerika_blog @AlbertBrenner1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760
IN REPLY TO:
@johann_theron
The cause of SJW behaviour? @Outsideness @amerika_blog @curtdoolittle @AlbertBrenner1 http://t.co/wmxwizk6EY
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760
-
and (b) we enfranchised women without limiting their ability to gossip (lie)
and (b) we enfranchised women without limiting their ability to gossip (lie).
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-31 11:51:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638318188162367488
Reply addressees: @johann_theron @Outsideness @amerika_blog @AlbertBrenner1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760
IN REPLY TO:
@johann_theron
The cause of SJW behaviour? @Outsideness @amerika_blog @curtdoolittle @AlbertBrenner1 http://t.co/wmxwizk6EY
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638273501913333760
-
I am not trashing NRx. I state why the NRx needs reformation in order to expand.
I am not trashing NRx. I state why the NRx needs reformation in order to expand. (Which I think I provide.)
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-31 11:49:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638317716315766784
Reply addressees: @MatthewRenauld @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638317296251990016
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MatthewRenauld @Outsideness So you mean you don’t have any substantive criticism, and are resorting to name calling? 😉 Right? (Yes).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/638317296251990016
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MatthewRenauld @Outsideness So you mean you don’t have any substantive criticism, and are resorting to name calling? 😉 Right? (Yes).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/638317296251990016
-
Fiorina on business and economy. Although I’d still prefer Trump on Immigration,
Fiorina on business and economy. Although I’d still prefer Trump on Immigration, trade negotiations and anti-establishment.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-30 08:00:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637897563077758976
Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/636934934733570050
IN REPLY TO:
@FriedrichHayek
I’m officially backing Carly Fiorina for President. Rubio is now my VP choice. We need someone who can throw punches https://t.co/4fhX0w5qVV
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/636934934733570050
-
Majority Assent is helpful in the allocation of scarce resources to prioritized
Majority Assent is helpful in the allocation of scarce resources to prioritized ends.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-29 12:14:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/637599102688198656