Theme: Governance

  • The Third Way (the end of history) Is The Truthful Society – Not Democracy

    [I] am not sure how Fukuyama missed it, other than it seems like all throughout his career he seeks to justify his theory of monopoly bureaucracy, and his admiration of Sinic civilization. He investigates the problems of bureaucracy under democracy – the failure to develop an independent professional bureaucracy first, and then democracy, such that patronage jobs are not given out.

    But he does not demonstrate that the public intellectual class and private companies would not create problems of the Deep State’s self maximization of self interest, the parasitism of bureaucracy, and the bureaucracy’s attempt to eliminate all competition, and it’s enforced stagnation. To create a high trust society one requires (a) a near universal militia (b) private property rights, independent judiciary (‘priesthood’) and rule of law proper (c) a natural nobility with long term interest in the territory, (d) insurers of last resort operated by professionals. One does not require a monopoly bureaucracy. It is an admission of the failure of a people to develop and maintain rule of law. One requires rule of law, law sufficiently articulated that it is inescapable (decidable), and universal standing such that the people can make use of it to control anyone acting in a public capacity in addition to private capacity. If the basis of law is articulated as the total prohibition on free riding in all its forms, including: violence, theft, fraud, free riding, conspiracy, invasion and conquest; and if we defend the informational commons from pollution (“Abusus”), by requiring proof of existence and morality in any claim of common good; and if we construct a market for the construction of commons between the classes; then the end of history is not as Fukuyama claims – the professional bureaucracy. Instead, the professional bureaucracy is yet another example of the failure of a people to develop an answer to the problem of politics, ethics, economics and the social sciences. Chinese failed first to solve the problem of politics. They created the monopoly state first, and never discovered the rule of law. And in doing so, they failed first. The end of history – at least the end of history that we can see today – is the truthful society. And democratic polities of all stripes are yet another failure to construct rule of law applicable to every living soul. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
  • The Third Way (the end of history) Is The Truthful Society – Not Democracy

    [I] am not sure how Fukuyama missed it, other than it seems like all throughout his career he seeks to justify his theory of monopoly bureaucracy, and his admiration of Sinic civilization. He investigates the problems of bureaucracy under democracy – the failure to develop an independent professional bureaucracy first, and then democracy, such that patronage jobs are not given out.

    But he does not demonstrate that the public intellectual class and private companies would not create problems of the Deep State’s self maximization of self interest, the parasitism of bureaucracy, and the bureaucracy’s attempt to eliminate all competition, and it’s enforced stagnation. To create a high trust society one requires (a) a near universal militia (b) private property rights, independent judiciary (‘priesthood’) and rule of law proper (c) a natural nobility with long term interest in the territory, (d) insurers of last resort operated by professionals. One does not require a monopoly bureaucracy. It is an admission of the failure of a people to develop and maintain rule of law. One requires rule of law, law sufficiently articulated that it is inescapable (decidable), and universal standing such that the people can make use of it to control anyone acting in a public capacity in addition to private capacity. If the basis of law is articulated as the total prohibition on free riding in all its forms, including: violence, theft, fraud, free riding, conspiracy, invasion and conquest; and if we defend the informational commons from pollution (“Abusus”), by requiring proof of existence and morality in any claim of common good; and if we construct a market for the construction of commons between the classes; then the end of history is not as Fukuyama claims – the professional bureaucracy. Instead, the professional bureaucracy is yet another example of the failure of a people to develop an answer to the problem of politics, ethics, economics and the social sciences. Chinese failed first to solve the problem of politics. They created the monopoly state first, and never discovered the rule of law. And in doing so, they failed first. The end of history – at least the end of history that we can see today – is the truthful society. And democratic polities of all stripes are yet another failure to construct rule of law applicable to every living soul. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
  • (not that I feel like beating on russia these days, but truth is truth) The west

    (not that I feel like beating on russia these days, but truth is truth)

    The west has legitimate problems with Russia:

    1) Russia’s history of murdering its own people in vast numbers, and occupying and destroying much of eastern Europe, and then engaging in both the cold war and the expansion of world communism. This history prevents Russia from making a legitimate claim to extension of its borders just as we resist german’s extension of is borders.

    2) Absence of rule of law, widespread corruption, use of propaganda and outright lying – which in Russia is heroic and in the west is the very pinnacle of immorality. The Russian sponsorship of a predatory government maintaining the poverty of the people of Ukraine and its agitation over the return of eastern Europe to christendom given its history was and is intolerable both to Westerners and to eastern europeans. The assumption that Russia would add rule of law but retain its conservatism was just fine – as long as Russia joined the west thereby uniting all european peoples and restoring christendom after its destruction by the communists. This would have achieved the long standing goal of uniting german culture and engineering with Russian resources and labor.

    3) Russian intellectuals’ fascination with the restoration of an empire responsible for genocides only surpassed by the Chinese, and the tragic victimization and impoverishment of eastern Europe, and even Germany – instead of unity of european peoples. As if power – disappearing people in the night, suppressing speech, and terrorism by secret police – rather than prosperity were somehow something to aspire to.

    4) Invasion of Ukraine breaking the postwar consensus on borders – the purpose of which was to prevent another world war. In doing so Russia confirmed both its failure to learn from its past failings, and its willingness to impose harm on ‘our people’. Putin was until then a respected politician in the west who could just have asked the west to negotiate a trade for discounted natural gas in exchange for a full crimean lease including independence on the hong kong model for 200 years – after which it would have been irrelevant. The same for the Donbas since Ukrainians despise that region because it’s the source of Russian influence on the government, source of gangsters supported by Russia, and the source of the drug trade. So Putin confirmed that Russia had learned nothing, and wishes to repeat its past crimes against humanity.

    American utopianism is absurd and the neo-conservative movement has been as disastrous as the progressive, neo-puritain, and socialist. Americans are perfectly happy to feel good about themselves by punishing brown and yellow people the world over. America has the luxury of stupidity due to wealth in part gained by their domestic utopianism.

    And sure, democracy is done for, republicanism is a luxury of wealthy europeans riding on the accumulated wave of centuries of intellectual, technical and artistic achievement. Yes, women have have used enfranchisement to incrementally destroy the west that alone liberated them, and yes, the left has used the funding provided by women through advertising and expanding education in the the academy and rent seeking that expands the state to convert us into another brazil.

    That does not mean that anything Russia desires or does is not more of the same even worse than we have experienced from her before. She rails against the nazis who were half the criminals the russians have been.

    That people want strength is a statement of their weakness.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-15 17:31:00 UTC

  • Democrats vs Liberals: Democrats are low IQ people who vote for free stuff. Libe

    Democrats vs Liberals:

    Democrats are low IQ people who vote for free stuff.

    Liberals are high IQ people who use free stuff to win votes.

    qotd: Shaun Moss


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-15 13:06:00 UTC

  • YES I AM A PACIFIST Of course I am a pacifist. Meaning that I see the highest pu

    YES I AM A PACIFIST

    Of course I am a pacifist. Meaning that I see the highest purpose of great men is to pacify the universe and make an Eden of it.

    The counterintuitive fact is that the pacification of that universe requires the incremental suppression of parasitism by our fellow man, and the continuous genetic pacification of our fellow man since he is the greatest obstacle to that Eden.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-14 10:43:00 UTC

  • Let me help you. The purpose of surveys is to frame opinion. Don’t be daft

    Let me help you. The purpose of surveys is to frame opinion. Don’t be daft.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-13 07:35:00 UTC

  • THE UTILITY OF RELIGIONS FOR MANAGING A SOCIAL ORDER. AND JURIDICALISM AS ‘RELIG

    THE UTILITY OF RELIGIONS FOR MANAGING A SOCIAL ORDER. AND JURIDICALISM AS ‘RELIGON’.

    —“Confucianism is a much more useful system for managing social order than either Islam or Christianity”— Michael Philip

    True. But the prohibition on parasitism expressed as the right to property-en-toto, expressed as ‘natural law’, the common english law, and an independent judiciary is the most useful system for managing a social order ever invented. The problem is, how do you create the trust necessary for a juridical system to function without a militia intent upon its construction?

    This is why Confucianism functioned: it was a means of reconciling the tyrannical nobility by providing a means of resisting them, as well as a means of legitimizing their claim to power if they adopted it.

    Christianity is a religion of expansionary cooperation (love). It is an exceptional religion for the development and maintenance of middle classes because trade velocity and trust are reciprocally dependent. Christianity did not seize power in Europe so much as legitimate and delegitimize rulers. If a ruler was delegitimized his lands were open for conquest by others.

    Islam is a religion of expansionary violence. It justifies that expansionary violence. It is an exceptional religion for the lower classes who cannot develop trust. It provided legitimacy to conquerors.

    Judaism is a religion that justifies non contribution to a physical commons, requires contribution to a normative commons, and encourages and parasitism of the normative and physical commons of others.

    So my work, as I understand it, is the completion of the use of the common and natural law as a prohibitionary social order, enforced by a judiciary and a militia. It is effectively a scientific ‘religion’ of law, in which truth, trust, and militial defense of the judiciary, are the necessary costs we bear for its construction.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-13 05:07:00 UTC

  • ITS ARISTOCRACY THAT’S INDISPENSABLE, NOT AMERICA –“America leads. We’re the in

    ITS ARISTOCRACY THAT’S INDISPENSABLE, NOT AMERICA

    –“America leads. We’re the indispensable nation.”– Obama

    Let me correct not only Obama, but the entire deep state:

    – Aristocracy leads because aristocrats are naturally superior at leading.

    – Christian America is all that remains of world Aristocracy.

    – Aristocracy is indispensable – not to nations, but to mankind.

    Otherwise america is just an empire like any other.

    Kill the state corporation.

    Restore the monarchy and the nobility.

    Restore exception-less, rule of law, and universal standing, under the only natural law that exists: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of hazard and externality of the same.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-10 06:42:00 UTC

  • THE JUSTIFICATION FOR OUR REVOLUTION. As a philosopher I don’t have to fantasize

    THE JUSTIFICATION FOR OUR REVOLUTION.

    As a philosopher I don’t have to fantasize – I try to understand and describe causes. Propertarianism is descriptive.

    That is because, like all philosophers who bridge one era and the next, it is from decline and failure that we can determine our prior successes.

    From industrial decline we see medieval and ancient success.

    And then we describe and outlaw the evils of the prior era that caused us to lose our way.

    I will outlaw deceit – Anglo, German and Jewish.

    I will incrementally increase the suppression of new modes of parasitism.

    Western philosophy is expressed as law. Everything else is expressed as either religion or aesthetics.

    And with that increase in suppression of deceit, we will transform the world as greatly as the transformation from mysticism to moralism, moralism to rationalism, rationalism to science.

    Because we will render ethics and politics as science for the fist time in human history.

    If that isn’t a profound ambition sufficient to justify our revolution then I do not know what else could be.

    Curt Doolittle

    The philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-08 02:44:00 UTC

  • (I don’t see christian africans of any continent as competitors but allies. I do

    (I don’t see christian africans of any continent as competitors but allies. I don’t see jews as competitors but dependents. I see Russians, muslims, Chinese as competitors if not outright enemies. )


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-07 08:24:00 UTC