Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • A Short Course In The Transaction Cost Theory of Government

    THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/ THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/23/the-meaning-of-incremental-suppression/ GENETIC PACIFICATION AND THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/law-genetic-pacification-the-problem-of-retaliation/ FULL SPECTRUM INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/24/full-spectrum-incremental-pacification/ THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/12/11/the-transaction-cost-theory-of-government-2/ PEAK HUMAN http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/11/22/peak-human-and-dysgenic-policy/ THE BIGGER PICTURE – A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/

  • A Short Course In The Transaction Cost Theory of Government

    THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/ THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/23/the-meaning-of-incremental-suppression/ GENETIC PACIFICATION AND THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/law-genetic-pacification-the-problem-of-retaliation/ FULL SPECTRUM INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/24/full-spectrum-incremental-pacification/ THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/12/11/the-transaction-cost-theory-of-government-2/ PEAK HUMAN http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/11/22/peak-human-and-dysgenic-policy/ THE BIGGER PICTURE – A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/

  • SHORT COURSE IN THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPR

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/A SHORT COURSE IN THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT

    THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/

    THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/23/the-meaning-of-incremental-suppression/

    GENETIC PACIFICATION AND THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/06/law-genetic-pacification-the-problem-of-retaliation/

    FULL SPECTRUM INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/08/24/full-spectrum-incremental-pacification/

    THE TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF GOVERNMENT

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/12/11/the-transaction-cost-theory-of-government-2/

    PEAK HUMAN

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/11/22/peak-human-and-dysgenic-policy/

    THE BIGGER PICTURE – A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-03 08:18:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF POLITICAL POWER? –“Curt: Political power ultimately origi

    WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF POLITICAL POWER?

    –“Curt: Political power ultimately originates from Economics or exchange, right?”—

    I am not sure I understand this question.

    There are three methods of power: 1) force, 2) payment, 3) gossip.

    One can use those three methods exclusively or in combination to band together into groups or hierarchies, and the focus the group’s efforts on the application of force, payment, or gossip (rallying/shaming/including/ostracizing).

    Political power – meaning anything ranging from monopoly producer of commons to a distributed production of commons – can be constructed from any one or combination of, those methods of coercion.

    Political power originates in the ability of humans to organize and coerce.

    It just so happens that we use gossip to rally and shame and ostracize people from production and opportunity for consumption.

    But then we scale.

    It just so happens that you need to use violence to suppress parasitism sufficiently for a market to form, at that scale.

    But then we scale further.

    And then to use law to suppress cheating, fraud, and to impose performance, and restitution, and if necessary, punishment.

    But then we scale further.

    And then we use wealth created by the application of violence and law and to force market participation rather than parasitism, to pay off those who cannot be forced.

    And then, we hit the novel inflection point, and scale further:

    And so we then use force, law and gossip to suppress the suppressors, and rely entirely upon rule of law, without a group that exercises power.

    So the sooner one develops rule of law, the sooner one starts suppressing the parasitism of the monopoly.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-03 06:23:00 UTC

  • Politicians vote their obligations. You cannot fix this. Man follows incentives.

    Politicians vote their obligations.

    You cannot fix this. Man follows incentives.

    Replace elected politicians with juries chosen by lot.

    Replace bills with petitions.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 06:25:00 UTC

  • ( The suffrage movement was originally developed in response to the wealth of th

    ( The suffrage movement was originally developed in response to the wealth of the industrial revolution. The Feminist movement was developed in an effort to replace Patriarchy with Matriarchy. But there is a reason no societies are Matriarchal: they are easily conquered if men do not defend the female herd from other male packs. In other words, one of the central problems with the formation of any ‘society’ is providing men with the incentive to defend a commons.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-29 14:24:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.medievalists.net/2016/01/23/the-power-of-medieval-states-a-report-from-the-year-1423/

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-25 03:20:00 UTC

  • TRUMP VS PROGRESSIVES – DIFFERENCE IN TECHNIQUES (Contrast conservative aristocr

    TRUMP VS PROGRESSIVES – DIFFERENCE IN TECHNIQUES

    (Contrast conservative aristocratic mythology that demonstrates intertemporal effects, with progressive underclass pseudoscience that obscures intertemporal effects.)

    Lets look at his technique:

    a) He uses hyperbole to get media attention, and draw criticism, which they then use to distribute his meme. He has the most airtime. And spends nothing to get it.

    b) Nothing he says is substantially false – it’s hyperbolic. It’s not false.

    c) His tactic (and the conservative tactic) is to shame against extracting resources to transfer from good families to bad.

    d) Conservatives (aristocracy) use hyperbole to illustrate the intertemporal effect of scale: Kant’s “if everyone did this” test.

    Ergo: CONSERVATIVES SPEAK IN THE LANGUAGE OF MYTHOLOGY

    The progressive trick is to do the OPPOSITE.

    a) state something that is technically true but practically false.

    b) almost everything they say is substantially false.

    c) their tactic is to shame into extracting resources from good families to bad families.

    d) Progressives (socialists), use pseudoscience and pseudo-rationalism to obscure intertemporal effects “so that as many people as possible can get away with this.”

    Ergo: PROGRESSIVES SPEAK IN THE LANGUAGE OF PSEUDOSCIENCE.

    Hence: My work on Testimonialism….. Fix them both. Truth is enough to restore the west. But truth and hyperbole are compatible, while truth and pseudoscience are not.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-24 15:57:00 UTC

  • “Unless Donald Trump is elected, we’re never going to have another Republican pr

    —“Unless Donald Trump is elected, we’re never going to have another Republican president,” Coulter added, warning that having another Democrat in the White House would mean that “it’s over” and “the country is finished” because there will be a “Supreme Court of nine Ruth Bader Ginsburgs.”

    “What is the point of talking about abortion or anything else unless you get Donald Trump in to build the wall, deport illegals, end this ‘anchor baby’ nonsense, stop importing 100,000 Muslims a year, in addition to two million Third Worlders per year,” she said. “It’s madness what this country has been doing.”— Ann

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-24 15:13:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/ann-coulter-god-raised-trump-save-us-1000-years-darkness

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-24 08:36:00 UTC