Anarchism is an insufficient definition for the purposes of answering that question.
https://www.quora.com/Do-anarchists-demand-the-impossible-Why
Theme: Governance
-
The martial class has been intentionally eliminated from governance. The current
The martial class has been intentionally eliminated from governance. The current crisis is the result. We are man’s judges. We must rule.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 07:25:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710004040822816768
-
The martial class has been intentionally eliminated from governance. The current
The martial class has been intentionally eliminated from governance. The current crisis is the result. We are man’s judges. We must rule.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:25:00 UTC
-
A FALSE DICHITOMY IN CHESTERSON CLARIFIED. —“You can be guided by the shrewdne
A FALSE DICHITOMY IN CHESTERSON CLARIFIED.
—“You can be guided by the shrewdness or presence of mind of one ruler, or by the equality and ascertained justice of one rule; but you must have one or the other, or you are not a nation, but a nasty mess.”–G.K. Chesterson.
He makes the mistake of confusing republican rule of law, with monarchical discretion. And he does not know enough about his past to identify market government as the third option instead of there being only two. Nor does he seem to grasp that whether we possess one decision maker, or many, or a market, that all three must regulate by rule of law, or none can produce good, and all will produce ill.
But I am criticizing him for a point he does not make. He is merely saying that there must be rule. whether it is pure rule of law and competing commons (market government), rule of law with representative decision makers producing monopoly commons, or a monarch bound by rule of law, but with sole discretion over the production of commons, rule of law is a constant, and the means of decision making over the production of commons is simply a matter of the heterogeneity (republicanism) or heterogeneity (market and monarchy) of the interests of the population.
My preference is to treat these three methods of decision making as a distribution of labor, and to say that the king must make decision on war, and hold veto (act as judge), the senate must make decisions on commerce(revenues/production), and the common people must make decisions on commons (insurance and consumption). And that if none can find legal means of veto then the measure should pass as a legitimate contract between the classes.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-15 07:19:00 UTC
-
We are the men of the west. We are the last line of defense. Our church has aban
We are the men of the west. We are the last line of defense. Our church has abandoned us. Our academy has abandoned us. Our state has abandoned us. Our industry has abandoned us. Our militaries have abandoned us. We are all that stands between our people and extinction. We few. We happy few.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-14 15:19:00 UTC
-
Some men create revolutions. Others create the potential and then demand change.
Some men create revolutions. Others create the potential and then demand change. The latter is the “English Way.”
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-14 14:29:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709385853618016256
Reply addressees: @AidanTTierian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709215295135731712
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709215295135731712
-
Conservative LARPING is more challenging than Libertarian LARPING. And the left
Conservative LARPING is more challenging than Libertarian LARPING. And the left doesnt’ LARP they DO.
People do what they can that is in their interests. The left immediate, the middle practical, and the right long term.
We are born with this division of perception.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-14 10:25:00 UTC
-
Talking with Heinrik tonight about “WE ARE THE NEW RIGHT.” I have to manage, whi
Talking with Heinrik tonight about “WE ARE THE NEW RIGHT.”
I have to manage, while fighting through this cold medicine, to make some important intellectual points. I hope I can do it.
The right movements of each culture failed.
The right has a harder time with philosophy
Conservative intuition is the most temporally distant and the hardest to describe.
immediate consumption of progressive/feminine requires only immediate experiential. Intermediate wealth generation of the libertarian requires only agreement. But the long term requires the mind exaggerate all effects over the long term.
Of these three we are discussing increasingly complex phenomenon: experience, estimation, and long term projection.
Our function is to set limits on individual gratification if it comes at the expense of the tribe, and to defend gratification if it does not. Especially when that gratification comes to reproduction or immigration that would weaken the tribe.
What I have endeavored to do is to create a language by which all three of these can be discussed rationally.
That is the failure of the conservatives in every society. They work with the tools that they understood from the past (belief, sentiment, tradition) rather than inventing tools necessary for the new era.
We are the new right because we have fully abandoned the enlightenment fallacies of the nature of man and returned to the problem of continuous domestication that we have been practicing for thousands of years, and which started our dominion over man, nature, and universe.
We are the new right, because we now have a language, and a solution to offer, where the past thinkers did not.
What are those languages?
Lies and deceits (postmodernism), Allegory and myth(religion). Morality(reason). Rationalism(post-kantian philosophy). Allegory and history(empiricism). Pseudoscience(jewish enligthenment). Science(testimony free of error and bias).
We have a true description of failure (equality), a language for describing it (science), and a solution to adopt: market government and nationalism.
So we are the new right because we are the first people to have earned that status through identifying the problem, accumulating evidence by waiting until it was intolerable, developing a social science, proposing a solution, and organizing a revolution with which to remove the lies from all walks of our lives and return us to our tradition of excellence.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-14 06:46:00 UTC
-
The lower end of conservatism wants to be smart. They want arguments. To engage
The lower end of conservatism wants to be smart. They want arguments. To engage in democratic debate. To persuade.
Unfortunately this is not a conservative’s function in the division of perception, cognition, knowledge and advocacy. It is the libertarian or a progressive for whom republican libertarianism and equalitarian democracy was invented.
Your purpose, function, existence, is to set limits to individual gratification if it comes at the expense of the tribe, to defend those limits with threat and violence, to punish the offenders of those limits, and to kill those who cannot otherwise be stopped.
You aren’t supposed to think very hard. You are supposed to act. And to leave gossip and rallying and shaming to the women.
Punish the wicked. Do not debate them. Violence is our art. Negotiation libertarians, and gossip the feminine progressive. We negotiate for mutual benefit. But there is no permissible gain at the expense of the tribe.
That is your duty.
Think less. Do more. Punish the Wicked in your realm. Let those of us in the upper arts of law punish those in ours.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-14 06:32:00 UTC
-
There was a kid in my town who liked to start houses on fire. When they caught h
There was a kid in my town who liked to start houses on fire. When they caught him, he said the same thing. Voting=Torching.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-14 02:54:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709211160541839360
Reply addressees: @AidanTTierian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709207957104431104
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709207957104431104