Theme: Governance

  • Love you man, and you are one of the best we have, and certainly one of our best

    Love you man, and you are one of the best we have, and certainly one of our best advocates. But let’s understand the normies:
    (a) They need a great deal of knowledge of multiple fields to understand these things – and while you have it, most don’t
    (b) They need a lot more IQ points than is obvious and you while you have them, most don’t.
    (c) And, finally, and this is the interesting part: the validity of ideas is partly dependent upon the context in which they are found or delivered. So when people see this work they do not expect what they have found, and do not interpret it through that lens, nor contemplate that anything I (we) say is extremely dense and needs to be contemplated.
    I assume when we publish it will add some validity but I also assume the degree of controversy, which will be greater than that of Darwin, will attract endless braindead criticism. So our job isn’t easy. They killed Socrates. They tried to kill Aristotle. They went after Galieo. And the only reason they didn’t hang Darwin was because the academy found an opportunity to seek independence from the church.
    If I wanted to make money I would. This is a calling. And those of us that are called, well, we need to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-19 20:01:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715095938279026688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715085379521708352

  • (not sure who asked, but thank you for the ask to respond) OPINION 1) the court

    (not sure who asked, but thank you for the ask to respond)

    OPINION
    1) the court reversed Roe Vs Wade for strategic reasons: (a) it did not result in ‘settled law’ which is the purpose of hte court. (b) RvW delegitimized the court by taking on a matter that was (obviously) reserved for the states. (c) the court has a series of thes (corrections) that it is trying to reverse in response to Scalia’s influence that the court wsa no longer fulfilling its mission and instead had become a vehicle for activism that circumvented the states, and the federal legislature, and as such teh people.

    2) I have a very hard time imagining the court taking this case unless the argument is something it can thoroughly support. OPINION: As far as I know a known violent criminal, capable of harm, and resisting arrest, who was held down, and complaining like all other criminals do who are guilty, died because of an accident, and becaues there was too much commotion around the officers. I do not believe the officer should have been guilty of anything other than a suspension and training so that it doesn’t happen again. It did affect the workd’s stactics but it also showed how successful neck control is in containing criminals. And that there are no alternatives that are as easy or successful. HOWEVER: I don’t see a venue for the court to reverese the conviction unless they can make the case that it was either handled improperly somehow, or motivated such that it was a political prosecution given that no other similar prosecutions have been made.

    Reply addressees: @Babygravy9 @theammind


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-19 18:07:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715067129139978240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715030546097566181

  • BTW: this map tells you everything you need to know. PS: The chinese are lying.

    BTW: this map tells you everything you need to know. PS: The chinese are lying.

    BTW: this map tells you everything you need to know.
    PS: The chinese are lying. (as usual) https://t.co/mnlGWluIaK


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-19 16:54:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715048891429597406

    Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @cerflerg @NatLawInstitute @therminium @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715046982241140962

  • (Twitter Censorship) Recieved my first ‘visibility limited’ notice from Twitter

    (Twitter Censorship)
    Recieved my first ‘visibility limited’ notice from Twitter today for something that I do not think was ‘hate’ and I did not mean it to be, but just an explanation of the current conflict. Though I suspect it was insulting because it was true.

    I don’t have a problem with this policy of either taking posts down or limiting their range. It’s fine. In a complex world that’s about the best we can do.

    Because my perception of what is true and useful that may lead to reconciliation, may easily be someone else’s sacred cow.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-19 01:31:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714816587511869440

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: ARE OUR PEOPLE READY?! The decades of idly standing-by are com

    RT @ThruTheHayes: ARE OUR PEOPLE READY?!

    The decades of idly standing-by are coming to a close.

    Nature returns by way of the natural orde…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 19:15:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714722008158626189

  • “Unequal Protection Under The Law” Free January 6th Political Prisoners. Why doe

    “Unequal Protection Under The Law”
    Free January 6th Political Prisoners.
    Why does the left get a hall pass for their reign of terror? https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1714082033989808328

  • RT @julie_kelly2: It’s unfortunate House Republicans dragged their feet on a ful

    RT @julie_kelly2: It’s unfortunate House Republicans dragged their feet on a full blown investigation into Jan 6. Had they released all the…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 19:11:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714720877731082409

  • WHAT JUMPS OUT IN DONORS TO WOKE PARTIES? Richard; –“What jumps out to me in th

    WHAT JUMPS OUT IN DONORS TO WOKE PARTIES?

    Richard;

    –“What jumps out to me in these figures is not only how left leaning large institutions are, but how the same is true for most professions.”– Richard Hanania

    WHAT JUMPS OUT?
    What jumps out at me is insulation from the market.
    Luxury Beliefs and Virtue Signaling are both possible and endemic, and match Veblen’s prediction of the wealth effect. “The reason to become educated is to escape the market (and work).”

    DIFFERENCES
    – Conservatives are directly participating in the market. The business owners across the variety of self employed of all scales directly interact with the market.
    This means they are personally responsible for capital.
    -versus-
    – The government
    – The big industries
    – The academy and education
    – The professions and white collar office workers
    – Most women
    All are insulated from the market by scale (or husbands).
    This means they are personally not responsible for capital.
    Which means the are not responsible for risk.

    What separates urban and suburban-rural voters?
    Responsibility for, and capacity for resonsibilty for capital.
    Cities generate demand for authority in lieu of responsibility and territories generate remand for responsibilty in lieu of authority.

    Why? *Asymmetry of Risk* and *Asymmetry of Responsibility*”

    If taxes were allocated by symmetry of risk then the ‘red’ group wouldn’t pay any at all. (In fact, it makes no sense that we tax any of the tradesmen in the country at all. They only contribute 3% to total taxation, and they burn their bodies by their late forties. (Yes our organization proposes this particular tax change.)

    What are the behavioral differences between males and females? Asymmetry of tolerance for risk, and therefore asymmetry of responsibilty for self, private, and common.

    We do not have a Cultural Problem. We have a political problem because we have an incentive problem. We have an incentive problem between urban cities and suburban rural areas. And we have an inescapable problem of women’s voting in favor of irresponsibilities, and men voting infavor of responsibilities.

    The only reason anything moves left, whether education, universities, workblace behavior, political organization, or economic performance, is because women everywhere and always vote for advancing irresponsibilty – despite the fact that the reason for the west’s success (for ‘whiteness’) is the maximization of individual responsibilty – including ‘truth before face’ which woen simply cannot bear. If you pull women from the voting pool everything is always RED except for the coastal immigrant cities whose populations have natural anti-responsibilty incentives.

    In other words, we largely have a ‘women problem’ that can be solved by giving women a separate lower house of government. And restoring the Senate as a proxy for the governor and the legislature of the states.

    Understand Our Govt Step 1
    This would preserve empirical Concurrency(in agreement) – we live in a concurrent republic not a democratic one under the Common law’s empirical Commonality (in disagreement) – not sure why I have to teach this every day. The purpose of concurrency to establish legitimacy (settlement) ACROSS regions, classes (and now sexes). So that the rights of minorities are protected against the malincentives of the majority -thereby preventing majority tyranny.

    Understand Our Govt Step 2
    The USG is a Market for Exchanges Between Classes And Regions – it is for debate on invstments and trades, not rule. The states rule and the people are sovereign. In europe under the napoleonic code instead of the common law, Governments rule, the government is sovereign, and the people are subjects.

    Again. No idea why I have to teach what should be crayon level concepts to the american and european peoples every day – but then I do. Because people are evil and seek power over others so that they don’t have to work, produce, and engage in reciprocal trade. And they will like like the dickens to do so.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @RichardHanania


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 19:07:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714719965830385664

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714122208514101668

  • RT @RichardHanania: If policy was determined by polls, woke capital would’ve nev

    RT @RichardHanania: If policy was determined by polls, woke capital would’ve never been a thing. One committed billionaire can matter more…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 18:39:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714712715615199672

  • We are not equals in the least. Others have alread answered in the thread. That

    We are not equals in the least.
    Others have alread answered in the thread.

    That said:
    We are food, energy, and resource independent.
    We are currently repatriating industry and re-industrializing faster than we industrialized in the second world war. (See steel, electronics especially).
    We have an underutilized labor force at home for demanding work, and a less skilled labor force to the south for less demanding work.
    We have additional resources to the north.
    Even better, if we repatriate the ‘overhead’ (we have almost 100M unnecessary people for the coming economy, almost all in immigrant cities.)
    The more the world descends into chaos and war the more our stability and security are an advantage, particularly in capital flight.
    Our only problems are underclass immigration and ending the leftist-woke movement which has some signs of burning itself out. The rest of the economy will eventually recover by repatriation of industry, and repatriation of immigrants.

    Reply addressees: @foundation_west @RashidaTlaib @POTUS


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 15:16:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714661779811213312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714654657946210375