Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • RESPONSE TO TOM WOODS SPEECH TO LIBERTARIANS. I love you Tom, but we have two ov

    RESPONSE TO TOM WOODS SPEECH TO LIBERTARIANS.

    I love you Tom, but we have two over invested generations alive today grasping at the straws of the hippie generation promise of libertarian communes.

    But Liberty and sovereignty have only been constructed and only can be constructed by the organised use of violence to prohibit the alternatives.

    Wishful thinking will die with the generation of over invested wishful thinkers – buried by the empirical evidence that Liberty, personal responsibility under Liberty, and the costly use of violence to obtain and hold that Liberty, is the desire of but a few.

    And so called libertarians may desire Liberty, may willingly carry the individual responsibility, but when it comes to paying the high cost of using violence to obtain and hold Liberty, they run away from that cost as rapidly as socialist run away from individual responsibility.

    So I see no difference between wishful thinking by socialists on the economy and personal responsibility, and wishful thinking by so called libertarians on the government and the high cost of violence needed to secure Liberty.

    Both are acts of fraud using moral pretence to attempt to excuse the payment of a cost necessary to obtain their desires.

    Fraud is fraud no matter what moral pretence it is wrapped in

    That socialist will fight, but not compete in the market. The libertarian will compete in the market but not fight.

    The conservative will both fight and compete in the market and bear the cost of norms and laws that place the inter generational family ahead of the temporal individual.

    As far as I can see conservatives are the only people willing to pay the cost of Liberty: normative, economic and military.

    Everyone else is a fraud.

    Curt Doolittle.

    The Propertarian Institute.

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 14:51:00 UTC

  • An empire with many nuclear weapons is economically, financially, diplomatically

    An empire with many nuclear weapons is economically, financially, diplomatically, and militarily vulnerable. Many small nation states aren’t

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 14:47:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/737656828746698752

  • Worth repeating. My position in Russia and Russians fills a volume at this point

    Worth repeating.

    My position in Russia and Russians fills a volume at this point. But for sake of newbies I’ll repeat it.

    Russian leadership is correct in preventing the expansion of western neoliberalism.

    My criticisms of the leadership were driven by the use of deception to invade Ukraine, and the adoption of intentional disinformation strategy. Because this division was unnecessary given that Ukraine would have traded territory for discounts in energy suce the dinbas was the source of much of our politics conflict and organised crime.

    And my position was the unification of German finance and technology with Russian resources and labor would produce a common interest that would allow the USA to complete its withdrawal from Europe.

    So my view is that in a fit of conspiratorial panic, Putin blinked and screwed the Russian people out of immediate prosperity, Americans out of exiting empire, and Europe out of salvation from cultural disintegration.

    I view Putin’s failure as the equivalent of the Assassination of duke Archibald – a catastrophic error that set off horrid chains of events.

    I think America if not all Anglo civilisation has been a disaster for the modern world since the 1850s. Everything Anglos have done has been wrong. Idealistic. Utopian. Profiteering under moral pretence.

    A total disaster.

    But that does not mean the Russian people appear capable of self government, creating an advanced economy, or even approaching rule of law. And they certainly shouldn’t be allowed to expand into Europe and cause even more harm to the Eastern Europeans who were terrorised and set back a century by soviet barbarism.

    Nor should we tolerate Russian failure to come to terms with their barbaric history and the falsehoods it is constructed upon.

    At this point in history we understand that Germany was always in the right and that Russia and the Anglosphere were in the wrong. And that German Ascent in support of her people was the best thing that could have happened to Europe.

    That American neocons were too stupid to work hard at incorporating Russia into nato, and Russians (Putin) too stupid to provide a plan and educate these imbeciles is another coincidence of mutual idiocy that’s hard to grasp

    Now at the present time, Putin has abandoned most of his absurd pollution of the informational commons and made positive internal moves taking advantage of nationalism.

    And he persists the conflict in Ukraine despite it having turned Ukraine from split to entirely antagonistic to Russia. But weakness would hurt him and nationalism empowers him so he will force exhaustion to take its course.

    Love this part of the world. I love Russian people and culture. But I dislike a world of deception between white people and I prefer we unify against the only threat we face in this world – Muslim invasions.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 14:29:00 UTC

  • VIA TWITTER @business @StephanieBodoni 1) The major opposition players (national

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-31/tech-giants-vow-to-tackle-online-hate-speech-within-24-hoursRESPONSE VIA TWITTER

    @business @StephanieBodoni

    1) The major opposition players (nationalists) are launching same services in response to mainstream(universalists)

    2) So what FB/T/G/MS will do by this is actually make a MARKET FOR NATIONALIST PLATFORMS.

    3) China and Russia started opposition tech for national reasons, but the writing is on the wall – it’s spreading.

    4) There is NOTHING in Twitter, FB, Google, MS tech that is not cheaply replicable, and only defended by US IP laws.

    5) So the more the ‘new church’ of commercial universalism tries to clamp down, the more the opposition is funded.

    6) There is nothing irrational about groupishness, tribalism or nationalism. Its universalism that’s the outlier.

    7) The smarter answer is to isolate groups not fund opposition groups by censorship.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 12:12:00 UTC

  • An empire with many nuclear weapons is economically, financially, diplomatically

    An empire with many nuclear weapons is economically, financially, diplomatically, and militarily vulnerable. Many small nation states aren’t if armed with a few nuclear weapons, artillery and militia.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 10:47:00 UTC

  • The End Of The Westphalian Order

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA13akwRFBc “You guys (Marines) are now 0 and 4 against guys in bathrobes and flip-flops running around with AK’s.” “The state finds itself in an increasing crisis of legitimacy”

    “The state has become the private hunting preserve of the establishment” (the deep state). “The Establishment is just Kabuki for the people in flyover land.” “Establishments can’t make things work. it’s one of serial failure.” “The establishment absolves itself from its failures.” “It cares only about remaining the establishment What happens to the rest of society is of little concern.” “The cultural marxism of the Frankfurt school.” “The purpose since 1919 has been the destruction of western culture and the christian religion.” “People are transferring their loyalty away from the state, and to those groups that they belonged to prior to the Westphalian peace” “We need an alliance of states against 4th generation groups. ” Of course, I think the opposite: that we need to restore our ability to participate in local fourth generation warfare. “The good news is that the money already has run out.” “[The military is] The grandest middle and upper class welfare scheme ever conceived.”  

  • The End Of The Westphalian Order

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA13akwRFBc “You guys (Marines) are now 0 and 4 against guys in bathrobes and flip-flops running around with AK’s.” “The state finds itself in an increasing crisis of legitimacy”

    “The state has become the private hunting preserve of the establishment” (the deep state). “The Establishment is just Kabuki for the people in flyover land.” “Establishments can’t make things work. it’s one of serial failure.” “The establishment absolves itself from its failures.” “It cares only about remaining the establishment What happens to the rest of society is of little concern.” “The cultural marxism of the Frankfurt school.” “The purpose since 1919 has been the destruction of western culture and the christian religion.” “People are transferring their loyalty away from the state, and to those groups that they belonged to prior to the Westphalian peace” “We need an alliance of states against 4th generation groups. ” Of course, I think the opposite: that we need to restore our ability to participate in local fourth generation warfare. “The good news is that the money already has run out.” “[The military is] The grandest middle and upper class welfare scheme ever conceived.”  

  • The Liberal Blind Spot

    (SOMEONE ASKED ME TO REPLY TO THIS ARTICLE) THE LIBERAL BLIND SPOT http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/opinion/sunday/the-liberal-blind-spot.html NICHOLAS 1) Groupishness and Clannishness are empirically existent, universally demonstrable, human behaviors. These should be taught in academia because teaching universalism is a lie. In other words, the academy lies. 2) We teach marxism, socialism, almost all philosophies, comparative religion. So why not teach ‘hindu science’ or whatever? Well, because those people use those arguments to resist competing groups and clans. We teach all sorts of lies – in particular that democracy is a ‘good’. 3) Most of our history in every culture is constructed largely of lies, and one of the greatest innovations of the past generation has been the use of genetics, archaeology, anthropology, and brain science to demonstrate that these things are lies. But the purpose of those lies is to preserve groupishness against competitors. So a great deal of historical revisionism is necessary. The current narrative that man was oppressed by aristocracies rather than domesticated, and that upward redistribution of reproduction was a good, has been suppressed. So has the fact that the west’s advantage is largely the result of 3500 years of eugenic reproduction, with aggressive hanging from 1100 forward. 4) Religious scholarship is certainly useful, but religions argument is not. However, the purpose of religious argument is to rally the classes to resist invaders. And in a time where the west is being invaded by peoples with higher densities in lower class distributions, this is a rational tactic to take under democracy. All ideologies are false. That’s why they ‘work’ to inspire. Religion is just an pre-democratic ideology from when classes needed to be rallied against the state. It’s still effective. General intellectual consensus is that the USA resisted the secular state more effectively than europe because (a) we had neither aristocracy nor church to dispossess land from, (b) we are more religious and religion is the most successful means of resisting a state and establishing the limits under which a state may govern. (c) we did not have the european civil wars (ww1/2) or the prior (30 Years War), – just the opposite: we had the american civil war in which we lost trust for the state. So we have the opposite experience from Europe. ***So the universalist left lies to advance its impossible and undesirable utopia in advance of academy, media, and state, and the particularist right can’t tell the truth as to why they created the extant utopia we call the west: eugenics – the upward redistribution of reproduction to the middle class rendering all europeans descendants of the middle class.*** So why should the academy lie so fervently in support of it’s ideology that it creates a reactionary resistance to its lies? The only problem has been that the conservative strategy (persistence of family, tribe, nation, and eugenic hierarchy) is not sellable under democracy. Furthermore, what separates today’s “Academy and Diploma” from Luther’s “Church and Indulgence”? Nothing really. We can tell from the data that all universities do is sort. Nothing is taught that is of value in the economy. I’s just boot camp for white collar workers – it answers the question: do you have the endurance? That’s all. Furthermore, what separates the sale of indulgences to fund St Peters and the sale of diplomas to fund university infrastructure, administration, and savings? Nothing at all. In fact, the intergenerational economic damage done by the academy system since 1963 has been the greatest redistribution of wealth since the military industrial complex. The university media and state have nothing but universalist commercial incentives which they profess are moral ideals. When in fact they are demonstrably immoral in that they are self interested, against the interests of the body politic, and by reversal of eugenic reproduction, destructive to mankind. The net is that we either practice eugenics and end up with the northern european model, or we end up with the castes of India, and south america, or in the worst possible case – by extensive down-breeding – we end up with the muslim world, and the pervasive ignorance of the muslim world. Why? Because the people at the bottom are worse for a polity than the people at the top are good. It is not that great civilizations have such great leaders. It is that one can only be a great leader in an advanced economy if one is not overly burdened by dependent and disutilitarian underclasses. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Liberal Blind Spot

    (SOMEONE ASKED ME TO REPLY TO THIS ARTICLE) THE LIBERAL BLIND SPOT http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/opinion/sunday/the-liberal-blind-spot.html NICHOLAS 1) Groupishness and Clannishness are empirically existent, universally demonstrable, human behaviors. These should be taught in academia because teaching universalism is a lie. In other words, the academy lies. 2) We teach marxism, socialism, almost all philosophies, comparative religion. So why not teach ‘hindu science’ or whatever? Well, because those people use those arguments to resist competing groups and clans. We teach all sorts of lies – in particular that democracy is a ‘good’. 3) Most of our history in every culture is constructed largely of lies, and one of the greatest innovations of the past generation has been the use of genetics, archaeology, anthropology, and brain science to demonstrate that these things are lies. But the purpose of those lies is to preserve groupishness against competitors. So a great deal of historical revisionism is necessary. The current narrative that man was oppressed by aristocracies rather than domesticated, and that upward redistribution of reproduction was a good, has been suppressed. So has the fact that the west’s advantage is largely the result of 3500 years of eugenic reproduction, with aggressive hanging from 1100 forward. 4) Religious scholarship is certainly useful, but religions argument is not. However, the purpose of religious argument is to rally the classes to resist invaders. And in a time where the west is being invaded by peoples with higher densities in lower class distributions, this is a rational tactic to take under democracy. All ideologies are false. That’s why they ‘work’ to inspire. Religion is just an pre-democratic ideology from when classes needed to be rallied against the state. It’s still effective. General intellectual consensus is that the USA resisted the secular state more effectively than europe because (a) we had neither aristocracy nor church to dispossess land from, (b) we are more religious and religion is the most successful means of resisting a state and establishing the limits under which a state may govern. (c) we did not have the european civil wars (ww1/2) or the prior (30 Years War), – just the opposite: we had the american civil war in which we lost trust for the state. So we have the opposite experience from Europe. ***So the universalist left lies to advance its impossible and undesirable utopia in advance of academy, media, and state, and the particularist right can’t tell the truth as to why they created the extant utopia we call the west: eugenics – the upward redistribution of reproduction to the middle class rendering all europeans descendants of the middle class.*** So why should the academy lie so fervently in support of it’s ideology that it creates a reactionary resistance to its lies? The only problem has been that the conservative strategy (persistence of family, tribe, nation, and eugenic hierarchy) is not sellable under democracy. Furthermore, what separates today’s “Academy and Diploma” from Luther’s “Church and Indulgence”? Nothing really. We can tell from the data that all universities do is sort. Nothing is taught that is of value in the economy. I’s just boot camp for white collar workers – it answers the question: do you have the endurance? That’s all. Furthermore, what separates the sale of indulgences to fund St Peters and the sale of diplomas to fund university infrastructure, administration, and savings? Nothing at all. In fact, the intergenerational economic damage done by the academy system since 1963 has been the greatest redistribution of wealth since the military industrial complex. The university media and state have nothing but universalist commercial incentives which they profess are moral ideals. When in fact they are demonstrably immoral in that they are self interested, against the interests of the body politic, and by reversal of eugenic reproduction, destructive to mankind. The net is that we either practice eugenics and end up with the northern european model, or we end up with the castes of India, and south america, or in the worst possible case – by extensive down-breeding – we end up with the muslim world, and the pervasive ignorance of the muslim world. Why? Because the people at the bottom are worse for a polity than the people at the top are good. It is not that great civilizations have such great leaders. It is that one can only be a great leader in an advanced economy if one is not overly burdened by dependent and disutilitarian underclasses. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • March, April, May Quotes

    An empire with many nuclear weapons is economically, financially, diplomatically, and militarily vulnerable. Many small nation states aren’t vulnerable if armed with a few nuclear weapons, artillery, and militia. ( It certainly SEEMS like the entirety of the NATO/UN organizations are nothing more than welfare programs: desperate attempts for post-empire anglos to perpetuate by bureaucracy what they’d constructed with arms and finance. ) The Warriors must suppress parasitism creating order under which commerce and reproduction prosper. We call it law. But it is perpetual war You might unknowingly lie on behalf of your genes. And they might lie to obtain your compliance. But they’re perfectly pragmatic in purpose. Moral intuitions tell you nothing other than how to pursue your reproductive strategy in the current circumstance as you understand it. If you think or feel a condition is moral it’s the product of indoctrination. Sure, objective morality exists. But few humans practice it. History is only a guide if you (a) know enough of it, and (b) don’t cherry pick it. Man’s rational thru history. Immorality can be rational. Promise of hereafter(priests tithes), (church indulgences). Promise of socialism(vote). Promise of prosperity(academy diploma). All lies. 1) The Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit. 2) Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Academy. Two false promises to deny truth. Monotheistic Religion requires submission and submission is incompatible with sovereignty. And the experience of Liberty requires existential sovereignty. The western tradition consists is in sovereignty, heroism, empiricism, the oath (truth and non parasitism), the common judge discovered law, the jury. Cultural Marxism and Postmodernism are nothing more than an attempt to use secular pseudoscientific language as ancients used the language of mysticism: for deceit. Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media were used to defeat aristocracy, by using false promises to rally women and proles. The Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit, were invented to defeat the aristocracy using false promises to rally women and proles. What’s the difference between the Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit, and Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media? Nothing.