He would have lost early on.
The public is done with the status quo.
We are throwing the bums out so to speak.
https://www.quora.com/How-would-Donald-Trump-have-acted-and-reacted-in-this-campaign-if-he-were-calmer-and-more-reasonable
Theme: Governance
-
How Would Donald Trump Have Acted And Reacted In This Campaign If He Were Calmer And More Reasonable?
He would have lost early on.
The public is done with the status quo.
We are throwing the bums out so to speak.
https://www.quora.com/How-would-Donald-Trump-have-acted-and-reacted-in-this-campaign-if-he-were-calmer-and-more-reasonable
-
0) Current innovators talk in group evolutionary strategies 1) Intelligent peopl
0) Current innovators talk in group evolutionary strategies
1) Intelligent people talk in institutions and incentives.
2) Educated idiots talk in laws and rights.
3) Well meaning fools talk in shoulds and morals
4) Idiots talk in meanings and contradictions
5) animals express emotions of acceptance and rejection.
Or like David said the other day, 2500 years after Aristotle we still have idiots arguing the meaning of terms like medieval theologians pondering the words of god.
It is more frequent on the left since their objective is to invoke feeling not to construct a rational argument
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-08 07:52:00 UTC
-
We must fight but we will win either way. Either we throw the last generation ou
We must fight but we will win either way. Either we throw the last generation out in November and buy ourselves allies and time, or we escalate and overthrow the government in between November and January, and make the nation ungovernable.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-05 08:08:00 UTC
-
Write amendments. Revolt if they are not implemented
Write amendments. Revolt if they are not implemented.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-04 19:00:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761275702662537216
Reply addressees: @mightyboom_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761275574224429056
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761275574224429056
-
Cultural Marxism, or more commonly “Political Correctness” only exists because w
Cultural Marxism, or more commonly “Political Correctness” only exists because we allow ALL rather than just TRUE speech. We don’t have to.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-04 17:29:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761252690949201920
-
“Political Correctness functions as an auction block or brokerage house, where t
—“Political Correctness functions as an auction block or brokerage house, where the Left, acting as Suzerain, interacts with its minority vassals, selects fitting tribunes among them, and allows those tribunes to issue seemingly importaant grievances to allay resentiment and appear potent.”— Jason Hurley
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-04 14:34:00 UTC
-
#tcot #conservative #nrx #altright Choose between retaliation spirals or virtue
http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/761094839010074625/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=761094839010074625#tlot #tcot #conservative #nrx #altright Choose between retaliation spirals or virtue signal spirals. https://t.co/z4HREE8rvX
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-04 03:02:00 UTC
-
POLITICAL MODELS AS RELIGIONS: STEADY-STATE FALLACY ***Religions evolve slowly a
POLITICAL MODELS AS RELIGIONS: STEADY-STATE FALLACY
***Religions evolve slowly and normatively. Common, discovered laws evolve rapidly in response to new discoveries of methods of parasitism. Between durable religion and tactical law, Political Models serve only as organizational tools that we use to advance our strategies. In our case, that strategy is liberty.
We do not fear liberty. We can compete on merit. It’s those that cannot compete on merit that fear a condition of liberty. So it is rational to say you ‘are’ a member of a religion, and rational to say that to achieve liberty in the current context you suggest we employ one political model or another.
But to grant political models the same constancy as religion is to de-facto cast political models as mystical religions independent of world circumstances, instead of operational tools by which we modify the world’s circumstances in pursuit of the political conditions we prefer.
Steady-state political orders are as fictional a theory as an evenly rotating economy. Neither exists or can.***
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-03 03:06:00 UTC
-
(political identity outside of the steady state fallacy) QUESTION: “What are you
(political identity outside of the steady state fallacy)
QUESTION: “What are you, a fascist, a republican, a libertarian, an anarchist?”
ANSWER: “I’m whatever’s necessary in the current environment to create and maintain liberty, my civilization, and my people.” — Carlos Clark
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-03 02:55:00 UTC