Theme: Governance

  • LIES ARE CHEAP AND THERE ARE MANY CUSTOMERS FOR THEM. Law is expensive. Religion

    LIES ARE CHEAP AND THERE ARE MANY CUSTOMERS FOR THEM.

    Law is expensive. Religion is cheap.

    Naval rule is cheap. Army rule is expensive.

    Aristocratic rule is cheap. Republican rule is expensive.

    Began with aristocratic Rule(personal service)

    Ended with Republican rule (bureaucracy)

    Rome began with a naval empire defending sea trade.

    Ended with a landed empire, defending territorial trade.

    Began with Expensive law(Truth),

    Ended with cheap religion (deceit).

    (Economics in everything.)

    THE REVOLUTIONS IN TRUTH AND THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION OF LYING

    CYCLE ONE

    The invention of aristocracy (heroism, truth, technology)

    the reaction invented religion (Zoroaster)

    CYCLE TWO

    The invention of reason (Socrates, Plato, Aristotle)

    The reaction invented monotheism (Christianity/rabbinical Judaism/Islam)

    CYCLE THREE

    The invention of empirical science (Maxwell, Darwin, Spencer, Nietzche)

    the reaction invented pseudoscience. (Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, Adorno)

    CYCLE FOUR

    The invention of ‘complete’ science (Testimonialism)

    The reaction invents (whatever the next great lie will be?)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-13 11:25:00 UTC

  • THE WORD “SOVEREIGNTY” AS USED BY THE CLASSES – Sovereignty : Aristocracy – Orga

    THE WORD “SOVEREIGNTY” AS USED BY THE CLASSES

    – Sovereignty : Aristocracy – Organizing the Polity.

    – Liberty: Burghers – Organizing the Economy.

    – Freedom: Laborers – Transforming resources

    – “Positive Freedom”): Consumption: women, children, and the underclasses


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-13 03:52:00 UTC

  • WAS ALEXANDER GREAT? MORE THAN HISTORIANS GIVE HIM CREDIT FOR ALEXANDER In the 3

    WAS ALEXANDER GREAT? MORE THAN HISTORIANS GIVE HIM CREDIT FOR

    ALEXANDER

    In the 3500 year old battle between the aristocracy(how we live) and the dictatorship(how most of the world lives) he was the first great general to defeat the first great threat to our civilization (our aristocratic civilization): the Persian Empire, and as a consequence the totalitarianism of the river civilizations, making the world safe for the territorial farming civilizations.

    What you might add to your understanding of history, is that those people who invented Aristocracy invented as a consequence, sovereignty. And the only possible means of decision making under sovereignty: debate, reason, logic, empiricism, and the objective Truth that results from their use; and the only possible institutions of decision making under sovereignty: jury, senate, democracy; And the only possible method of conflict resolution under sovereignty: Natural, judge-discovered, common law. And the methods of organization under sovereignty: a market for production of goods and services; a market for reproduction (marriage); a market for the production of commons (multi-house democratic government); a market for the production of knowledge (science); a market for leadership (election).

    Despite the west being poorer, less populous, and on the edge of the bronze age, the west advanced faster than the rest of the world in both the ancient athenian(navy)-spartan(army)-roman(industry), and modern anglo(navy)-german(army)-american(industry) eras, because there is no faster way of adapting and innovating than heroism, sovereignty, truth, and markets-in-everything.

    So Heroism creates the need for Sovereignty, which in turn creates the need for everything the west has achieved that we value.

    And that is why Alexander Matters. He is the HAND of Aristotle. And the two of them conquered the east in defense of the west. Aristotle conquered mysticism and falsehoods, and Alexander despotism.

    The west has a very important and unique idea: sovereignty.

    ASIDE: THE WORD “SOVEREIGNTY” AS USED BY THE CLASSES

    – Sovereignty : Aristocracy – Organizing the Polity.

    – Liberty: Burghers – Organizing the Economy.

    – Freedom: Laborers – Transforming resources

    – Consumption(‘so called positive freedom’): women, children, and the underclasses

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-13 01:50:00 UTC

  • LIBERTY? LET ME HELP YOU You possess Liberty when you rule – else you have but p

    LIBERTY? LET ME HELP YOU

    You possess Liberty when you rule – else you have but permission. The purpose of rule is to prevent others from ruling – so that you possess Liberty in fact not permission. But this condition can only survive if you have numbers sufficient to deny competitors the ability to rule. But to work together in numbers we require means of cooperating and means of dispute resolution. But these means cannot allow for discretion or we would no longer possess Liberty. To solve this problem we cooperate using productive fully informed warrantied voluntary exchange. To resolve differences we use rule of natural, judge-discovered common law. So we create a condition of Liberty by creating a condition of sovereignty, by cooperating via fully informed warrantied productive voluntary exchange, and resolving disputes by natural judge discovered common law under which we demand contribution to their defense and restitution for offense. And punish, enslave, remove, or kill those who do attempt to create any condition other than Liberty.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-12 09:52:00 UTC

  • House per class; members selected by lot; equidistribution of budget; survive le

    House per class; members selected by lot; equidistribution of budget; survive legal dissent instead of majority assent.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-12 05:23:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/775203262756712448

    Reply addressees: @danielcraigb @tlot

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/774985981632077824


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/774985981632077824

  • are all tilting to the Right: Weighing in on the Old Libertine vs New Libertaria

    https://t.co/Cmt2Fik1rZWe are all tilting to the Right: Weighing in on the Old Libertine vs New Libertarian Molyneux @tlot @StefanMolyneux


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-11 07:20:00 UTC

  • TO ALL ON “THE OLD VS NEW MOLYNEUX” Stephan ( and all of us ) are moving to the

    TO ALL ON “THE OLD VS NEW MOLYNEUX”

    Stephan ( and all of us ) are moving to the right for the simple reason that the libertarian assertion that the nature of man is identical to the libertarian personality and our moral bias merely yearning to be free, is as false as is the progressive assertion that the nature of humans is altruistic (maternal).

    Like almost all in social science, it turns out that despite a century and a half of pseudoscience, the evidence is in: that man is rational and chooses between moral or immoral because of the incentives at the time. The conservatives were right. Man is merely rational/

    So conservatives work to limit incentives to the productive, and prohibit the unproductive. Immigration was just the last straw. But for the past sixty years the central issue has been whether the individual(progressive and libertine) or family (conservative) should be the central object of policy. And the jury is in: while law must be designed for the individual actor, policy must be designed for longer time preference: the family, tribe, and nation.

    When the industrial revolution hit us, the great wealth that was created, inspired us to the falsehood that we had transcended our limits and the limits of nature. But we had only moved the window of possibility to cover larger populations. That does not mean that there are no limits to production and consumption.

    THE CONSERVATIVE (ARISTOCRATIC) MODEL: MARKETS IN EVERYTHING

    – A market for goods and services (the Market)

    – A market for reproduction (Marriage)

    – A market for enfranchisement (Defense and Emergency)

    – A market for commons (one house of government per class conducting exchanges)

    – A market for polities (competing small states and voluntary exit)

    In other words, there are no free rides – especially on the cost of creating the norms and institutions that we call property rights that can exist only when insured by reciprocal defense. The market was not natural in any sense – the evidence is that the market was constructed by the suppression of violence. Accelerated by the suppression of fraud. And now requires the suppression of falsehood, so that we can suppress the government itself: conspiracy.

    Sorry, but the world is moving right. For good reason. Anything else is suicidal to family, tribe, nation, and race. The cosmopolitan era has ended. Its pseudoscience pseudo-rationalism and pseudo-moralism, and conflationary argument is over. Libertinism ended along with neoconservatism and socialism. The experiment failed. We are unequal. We are competitors. We compete through cooperating because it is the least-bad form of competition that produces the most beneficial externalities. And only markets in everything make a condition of liberty possible.

    Hayek was right. Liberty is the condition produced by the rigid identification and enforcement of natural, judge discovered, common law that evolves to prevent and resolve conflict and retaliation spirals so that we may maintain the disproportionate value of cooperating on production, despite the constant incentive to engage in murder, violence, harm, damage, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by externality, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, conspiracy, rent seeking, monopoly seeking, statism, conversion-religion-disinformation, displacement-immigration, colonialism-conquest and war.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    PS: MORAL BIASES

    Moral overweigthing: Masculinism (islam)

    Moral balance: conservative bias (paterna/eugenicl)

    Moral bias: libertarian (brother/partner/ally)

    Moral blindness: progressive (maternal)

    Moral antagonist: Socialist, feminist, postmodernist, Libertine, Neocon – the weaponization of maternalism under democracy. (judaism)

    Just how it is. Conservatives are right.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-11 06:28:00 UTC

  • World Authoritarian-Libertarian spectrum will reflect trust/family by social ord

    World Authoritarian-Libertarian spectrum will reflect trust/family by social order


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-08 18:37:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773953479580737544

    Reply addressees: @Anti_Gnostic @ChateauEmissary @lewrockwell @ThomasEWoods

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773949007060201476


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773949007060201476

  • Only Property in Toto is sufficient to suppress demand for the state

    Only Property in Toto is sufficient to suppress demand for the state


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-08 18:35:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773952906731089921

    Reply addressees: @Anti_Gnostic @Mangan150 @ChateauEmissary @lewrockwell @ThomasEWoods

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773949007060201476


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773949007060201476

  • Only stateless polity possible is Nomocratic w/ Property in Toto

    Only stateless polity possible is Nomocratic w/ Property in Toto.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-08 18:34:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773952544691322880

    Reply addressees: @Anti_Gnostic @Mangan150 @ChateauEmissary @lewrockwell @ThomasEWoods

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773949007060201476


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773949007060201476