Theme: Governance

  • #tcot #nrx #newright #conservative

    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/792719579927683072/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=792719579927683072#tlot #tcot #nrx #newright #conservative https://t.co/wZXqiyvIXr


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 09:27:00 UTC

  • #tlot #tcot #nrx #newright #conservative

    #tlot #tcot #nrx #newright #conservative https://t.co/5lPSTuNOtg


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 01:38:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/792541155154100224

  • #tcot #nrx #newright #conservative

    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/792541155154100224/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=792541155154100224#tlot #tcot #nrx #newright #conservative https://t.co/5lPSTuNOtg


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-29 21:38:00 UTC

  • Rule of Religion used ostracization for non-conformity to norms. Rule of law use

    Rule of Religion used ostracization for non-conformity to norms.

    Rule of law used punishment for failure to respect property rights.

    Rule of credit used deprivation for failure to keep pace with the red queen.

    Rule of slavery was immoral as hell but to some degree necessary.

    Rule of serfdom was immoral but survivable.

    Rule of religion was imperfect but arguably moral

    Rule of law was perfect but certainly moral

    Rule of credit is absolutely positively immoral.

    Consumer capitalism is one thing.

    Rule by credit is simply the most effective kind of slavery ever invented.

    End the ability to weaponize credit.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-29 16:53:00 UTC

  • “The leftists think that we are just shouting lunatics, they do not understand h

    —“The leftists think that we are just shouting lunatics, they do not understand how much our learning progresses with each-other, they think we hate every-one, but they do not see our camaraderie and fraternity, in many affairs, in how we greet each-other, warm expressions of love, and how we are slowly moving forward in intellectual domains and leaving them behind.

    They having nothing comparable to things like this; all they do is gossip. Are there even learned leftists today? All they do is ruin the hour.”—Ricky Saini


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 22:55:00 UTC

  • SOROS EXPLOITS THE PEACE OF WESTPHALIA – OUR WESTERN FAILING The peace of Westph

    SOROS EXPLOITS THE PEACE OF WESTPHALIA – OUR WESTERN FAILING

    The peace of Westphalia mandated that states take responsibility for non-state actors within their borders.

    Prior to that point, all sorts of groups conducted war.

    We westerners have adopted this ‘rule’ so deeply that we treat it as metaphysical necessity rather than simple contract between kin-states to preserve the peace in an era where warfare was becoming increasingly damaging.

    We do not currently treat Soros or Islam as violators of the peace of Westphalia, or even that as of the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, the peace of Westphalia has been broken.

    War can be conducted by physical means, by invasion (immigration) means, by conversion (religious means), by economic means, by influential means (bribery or payment), and by informational means (propaganda and deceit).

    Yet westerners seem to have limited their concept of war to the physical. This is empirically and logically false. A remnant of the Westphalian peace wherein we agreed to allow our peaceful movements of people and ideas in a normative ‘free trade zone’ as long as states took responsibility for the actions of those within their borders.

    But we live in a world where the conduct of war has been drastically limited by nuclear weapons and economic asymmetries. So most warfare today is conducted by religious, economic, influential, and informational means – much cheaper means.

    Yet we have not adapted to the end of the Peace of Westphalia.

    George Soros is conducting war against Western civilization while under the protection of western civilization. Islam is conducting a war against western civilization while under the protection of western civilization. Jewish Cosmopolitanism in the forms of socialism, feminism, libertinism, and neo-conservatism, allied with Christian Puritanism in the form of Secular humanism, to conduct a war against the Western civilization while under the protections of western civilization for no other reason than the common man is habituated to the peace of Westphalia.

    We did not end the peace of Westphalia. We tried to extended it under the … pretense… of the universal declaration of human rights – itself, like the peace of Westphalia, was designed to limit state action to the evolution of their people and institutions such that they could join the civilized world’s open market.

    But George Soros has engaged in warfare aginst our people, just as cosmopolitans have done so, and just as puritans have done so, and just as feminists have done so, and just as communists, and their replacement resistance movement – Islam – has done so.

    War is any intentional attempt to reduce common capital in any of its forms. normative, religious, informational, economic, institutional, territorial, monumental

    We are at war.

    They ended the peace.

    Seize all assets of Soros from the original crime forward.

    His own, his family, his relatives, his organizations, those investments he has made, those who have taken his investments for the conduct of war (the Clintons, and theh Democratic party).

    Return those assets to the commons.

    “Cry havoc! And let slip the dogs of war!”

    Curt Doolittle

    Sovereignty: The Cult of Non-Submission

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Science of Natural Law

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 11:32:00 UTC

  • DECENTRALIZED DECISIONS ARE BEST WITH AUTHORITY ONLY HELPFUL WHEN QUESTIONS ARE

    DECENTRALIZED DECISIONS ARE BEST WITH AUTHORITY ONLY HELPFUL WHEN QUESTIONS ARE OTHERWISE UDECIDEABLE.

    (from Eli Harman )(worth repeating)

    I like markets and all – if suitably tempered by prohibition on what is demonstrably harmful.

    Offers and prices are the way of communicating positive values in the marketplace, with payment the authentication made that such communication is accurate.

    Threats are the means of communicating negative values in the marketplace with initiation of violent hostilities the authentication that such communication is accurate.

    Prices may be reckoned in money, or in blood.

    But either way, decentralized methods of decision making are generally best, with authority only better in select cases, and those too, vetted and delimited by decentralized means.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 10:42:00 UTC

  • WHETHER WE CALL IT INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY OR MARKET FASCISM, IS A JUST A TAUTOLO

    WHETHER WE CALL IT INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY OR MARKET FASCISM, IS A JUST A TAUTOLOGY – SAYING THE SAME THING FROM TWO POINTS OF VIEW.

    As an individual I might prefer sovereignty and creativity, or i might prefer liberty and prosperity, or I might prefer freedom and choice, or I might prefer subsidy in exchange for maintaining the physical and normative commons.

    But those wants are all the result of the use of sovereignty as the ultimate criteria of decidability, and by consequence the requirement for markets in every walk of life.

    Including the market for subsidy in exchange for the maintenance of the commons.

    It’s the subsidized that maintain the garden. Those that possess freedom and liberty that enjoy it, and the aristocracy that causes it.

    We either use violence to create sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy, or we let others use violence to enslave us.

    There is no alternative.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 09:36:00 UTC

  • MARKET FASCISM 1. Nothing but voluntary: …… Sovereignty, (a distributed dict

    MARKET FASCISM

    1. Nothing but voluntary:

    …… Sovereignty, (a distributed dictatorship)

    …… Liberty,

    …… Freedom, and

    …… Subsidy via exchange of behavior.

    2. Nothing but markets:

    …… Market for association ( and disassociation)

    …… Market for consumption (economy),

    …… Market for reproduction( marriage and family),

    …… Market for commons (multiple houses),

    …… Market for dispute resolution (common law)

    …………wherein All differences adjudicated by

    …………natural, judge-discovered, common, law.

    …… Market for rule (freedom of exit).

    3. Nothing but obedience

    ………… Obey the rule of law under natural law, or exit

    ………… No opposition is tolerated.

    ………… Deprivation, ostracization, physical removal,

    ………… …… internment, imprisonment, or death.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 21:05:00 UTC

  • ABOUT THE ALT RIGHT MYSELF. I get sh__t for this but, I see the world through cl

    http://www.dailystormer.com/a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right/LEARNING ABOUT THE ALT RIGHT MYSELF.

    I get sh__t for this but, I see the world through class-glasses, and I see the Alt Right as a largely middle and working class movement. And I see my work as New Right (good for mankind) not just my own people.

    I learned more from this Daily Stormer overview of the Alt-Right (none of which I had any experience with) than I have from a few years of being tangentially aware of it.

    http://www.dailystormer.com/a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right/

    I didn’t know 80% of what’s in the article. And I see class expression in the movement which can easily spread to the other classes. And perhaps that’s my affinity for it. Because I’m benefitting from the momentum that economy, demography, and alt-right angst has made.

    I’m not exactly working or middle class. I’ve been a 1%-er for a long time. Although at the present moment I’m certainly not. lol. I have a definite martial sensibility in that aristocracy, generals, and officers are responsible for the soldiery, the militia, and the citizenry even at cost to ourselves. And that bearing this cost is what we refer to as ‘heroism’. Whether that heroism be demontrated by immediate action and sacrifice, the cost of commons and war, or the constant subtle policing of nature, commons, family, and individual.

    In the early 90’s I simply wanted to give conservatives a language for discussing their ancient civilization in rational and scientific terms. Because I have an autistic dislike of irrational argument, and an autistic near hatred of artificial conflict. So I have been working on this problem since at least 1992, if not back to when I was writing radical right work in the 1980’s.

    So I consider my work the New Right, and global. The fact that we discovered the technology of incremental domestication through truth, science, and natural common law, doesn’t mean that any other people can’t do so, and raise themselves from human-animal, to human, to transcendent man.

    But the fact that the conservative population, the alt-right, the more genteel paleolibertarians, and the more academic New Right, are all moving in the same direction is a beautiful thing.

    And of those classes we must understand that it is the Alt Right classes who will FIGHT. And the rest of us are just members of the intellectual supply chain.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 08:26:00 UTC