Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • FWIW Russia’s Shoygu is a career engineer and politician. He just looks ferociou

    FWIW Russia’s Shoygu is a career engineer and politician. He just looks ferocious. He was given the position for political reasons. Not because he has military experience. He’s our equivalent of the head of the Department of Emergency Services (an engineering and logistics job).

    China’s Chang (patronym’s are stated first in China) is a career officer, but a career administrative officer, and not a warrior. He is in his position because china is in a period of expansion and he was previously in charge of acquisition and development of equipment.

    Iran’s Dehghan is a career air force officer with decades of military and intelligence experience. While not a ground-force commander he is battle tested, and holds his position out of demonstrated merit.

    There is no comparison to Mattis in this world. He is an example of the prussian continental and us marine american traditions. These are the two most stoic and empircal military traditions on earth. Unfortunately postwar moralism has polluted most of europe. We’d have to go back to germans of the world wars, or the germanic americans (patton, eisenhower, macarthur etc).

    This is why the interference of Clinton in the military must never be repeated. We need to replicate the marine culture in the army, separate the warriors from the technicians, give the warriors amazing retirement or injury benefits, and remove them from the technicians. We have to restore ‘arianism’ (roman/prussian stoicism) to our martial class and reposition the monarchy as the ward of that tradition stated clearly and without reservation in a constitution.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 09:34:00 UTC

  • THE LABEL CHANGED. BUT THE NEW RIGHT REMAINS —[Cernovich] is also a pathologic

    THE LABEL CHANGED. BUT THE NEW RIGHT REMAINS

    —[Cernovich] is also a pathological liar.– anon..

    No. That criticism doesn’t stand.

    The alt-right was changed from a self identifying label for all reactionaries, to a left-label for WN using Spencer in short order. Just as the left intended.

    That’s why (Me), Cernovich, and PJW, switched to ‘New Right’. To separate from the third rail. I started more than a year ago because I saw it coming. But this year, as it became obvious, people migrated. And we needed that name to stick. Because our enemy is not just the left, but the establishment ‘old right’.

    Compared to the Alt’s, The “New Right” works on advancing the good rather than criticizing the bad. This technique is always superior. Arguing agaist something is not he same as arguing for something. Arguing for specific policy (rule of law) is even better. But in truth, we must argue using ALL methods, since people obtain sentimental meaning from the arguments that they understand. It takes more knowledge to argue for something, and more knowledge to argue for a specific set of institutional changes, but we all ‘feel’ and will act in favor of what we can understand.

    And so ALL OF US had to deal with this change in label given the Spencer-division. Mike isn’t unique, and punching right on nonsense isn’t helpful.

    Here. Look how many ‘languages’ we are speaking in now:

    Spencer is working on WN, (wn)

    The green frog crew is working on ridicule. (alt)

    RamzPaul is working on pop criticism (alt)

    PJW is working on media criticism. (new)

    Moly is working on pure education. (lagging but getting there)

    Mike is working “within the system” (new)

    I’m working on ‘the next system’. (new)

    This movement covers the spectrum from separatism, to ridicule, to criticism, to education, to reformation, to revolution. And covers the classes from lower working to intellectuals.

    And that’ exactly what we NEED to do. No everyone is capable of the full spectrum of understanding or the full spectrum of arguments.

    The middle will, and the lower middle will, always hold the numbers, and provide the upper middle provide leadership. The bottom provides the soldiers, and the top provides the political solutions.

    THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION.

    We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your beleive in what can be accomplished. Some wthin the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    ( Mike Cernovich, Richard Spencer, The RAMZPAUL Show, Stefan Molyneux, Paul Joseph Watson, Eli Harman )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 13:15:00 UTC

  • FOR SCALE TO FUNCTION as an advantage: 1) Imperial governments MUST provide mili

    FOR SCALE TO FUNCTION as an advantage:

    1) Imperial governments MUST provide military only.

    2) Regional governments, consistency only

    3) Local governments social, only.

    3) There is no value in uniform social norms, no value in their centralization, no reason for conflict or conflict resolution, and great value in normative specialization.

    2) There is no value in polylogism, no value in centralization of law, and high value in juridical competition. (epistemic competition on decisions)

    1) There is no value in polymilitarism, and great value in centralization of the military (economies of scale)

    Curt Doolittle,

    The Natural Law of Sovereigns

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-26 19:26:00 UTC

  • All power resides in violence – violence exists by its own making. Finance, Prod

    All power resides in violence – violence exists by its own making.

    Finance, Production and Trade exist by permission.

    Priests, Academy, Intellectuals and Gossips by tolerance.

    The strong always rule.

    The question is, will you rule?

    Or will you be ruled?

    If you rule, will you rule competitively?

    Or will you rule uncompetitively?

    Rule is profitable. It is the most profitable of businesses.

    If one rules well, it is the most moral of businesses.

    If one rules well for a long time, one transcends man.

    So, stop thinking like a bourgeoise, and think as a ruler that makes the productive bourgeoise possible by permission, and the parasitic gossips, possible by tolerance.

    The reason to rule well, with permission and tolerance, is that one can rule profitably and enjoy it, one can rule long and persist it, and one can rule morally and transcend man.

    What greater achievements are possible?

    None.

    So let us rule.

    Rule well.

    Rule profitably and enjoyably.

    Rule persistently.

    And Transcend the beast man.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-26 14:01:00 UTC

  • “(d) Produce a comprehensive study of the security of the southern border, to be

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/25/executive-order-border-security-and-immigration-enforcement-improvements

    “(d) Produce a comprehensive study of the security of the southern border, to be completed within 180 days of this order, that shall include the current state of southern border security, all geophysical and topographical aspects of the southern border, the availability of Federal and State resources necessary to achieve complete operational control of the southern border, and a strategy to obtain and maintain complete operational control of the southern border.”

    “Sec. 5. Detention Facilities. (a) The Secretary shall take all appropriate action and allocate all legally available resources to immediately construct, operate, control, or establish contracts to construct, operate, or control facilities to detain aliens at or near the land border with Mexico.”

    “Sec. 8. Additional Border Patrol Agents. Subject to available appropriations, the Secretary, through the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, shall take all appropriate action to hire 5,000 additional Border Patrol agents, and all appropriate action to ensure that such agents enter on duty and are assigned to duty stations as soon as is practicable.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-25 23:39:00 UTC

  • OUR DEEP STATE AND AMERICAN POLICY Our deep state works on the post war principl

    OUR DEEP STATE AND AMERICAN POLICY

    Our deep state works on the post war principle “world wars must never never happen again”: “Never Again” is achieved by forcing all nations into the international marketplace of finance and trade for their survival. This is achieved by: (a) fixed borders, (b) self determination of populations (c) human (property) rights, (d) states are legitimate only in so much as they advance a, b, c. (e) use of force is warranted against any state that violates a, b, c. (f) this combination will produce a world market where territorial conflicts are of greater risk than possible reward.

    The “Unstated” problem with this strategy is (b), is “self determination is your choice, but if you choose poorly, we will exterminate you.”

    That’s the real problem with post-war policy.

    A LOT OF PEOPLE CHOOSE POORLY. (communism, socialism, and now islamism. and yes islamism is just another resistance movement like communism, and socialism. The difference is that they are doing it through migration. And in history, migration periods are the cause of EVERY DARK AGE IN HISTORY.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-25 16:36:00 UTC

  • “US” – by Paul Genova I’m noticing that a lot of you aren’t graciously accepting

    “US” –

    by Paul Genova

    I’m noticing that a lot of you aren’t graciously accepting the fact that your candidate lost.

    In fact you seem to be posting even more hateful things about those of us who voted for Trump.

    Some of you are apparently “triggered” because you are posting how “sick” you feel about the results.

    How did this happen you ask?

    You created “us” when you attacked our freedom of speech.

    You created “us” when you attacked our right to bear arms.

    You created “us” when you attacked our Christian beliefs.

    You created “us” when you constantly referred to us as racists.

    You created “us” when you constantly called us xenophobic.

    You created “us” when you told us to get on board or get out of the way.

    You created “us” when you forced us to buy health care and then financially penalized us for not participating.

    You created “us” when you lied and said we could keep our insurance plans and our doctors.

    You created “us” when you allowed our jobs to continue to leave our country.

    You created “us” when you attacked our flag.

    You created “us” when you took God out of our schools.

    You created “us” when you confused women’s rights with feminism.

    You created “us” when you began to emasculate men.

    You created “us” when you decided to make our children soft.

    You created “us” when you decided to rewrite school history books and remove the truth about our founders

    You created “us” when you decided to vote for progressive ideals.

    You created “us” when you attacked our way of life.

    You created “us” when you decided to let our government get out of control.

    You created “us” the silent majority.

    You created “us” when you began murdering innocent law enforcement officers.

    You created “us” when you took a knee, or stayed seated or didn’t remove your hat during our National Anthem.

    And we became fed up and we pushed back and spoke up.

    And we did it with ballots, not bullets.

    With ballots, not riots.

    With ballots, not looting.

    With ballots, not blocking traffic.

    With ballots, not fires, except the one you started inside of “us”.

    “YOU” created “US”.

    It really is just that simple

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-24 18:33:00 UTC

  • POLITICAL MODELS ARE USEFUL OR NOT, POSSIBLE OR NOT, BUT NOT GOOD OR BAD. USING

    POLITICAL MODELS ARE USEFUL OR NOT, POSSIBLE OR NOT, BUT NOT GOOD OR BAD. USING THEM CORRECTLY OR INCORRECTLY IS WHAT’S GOOD, OR BAD.

    All government models are useful for different time frames and different circumstances. The romans took on dictators in time of war, a republic (senate) in times of peace, and allowed limited democracy in times of plenty.

    1-Scarcity-Defense-Authority / 2-Normality-Production-Republic / 3-Plenty-Consumption-Democracy.

    Our desire for ‘one ness’ (predictability) is our curse. It’s against our interests. We become stronger with adaptation and weaker with consistency.

    There is NO REASON we cannot have a rule of law for determining each.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 17:17:00 UTC

  • IN THE LONG RUN… Communism doesn’t’ work because people are selfish, and minim

    IN THE LONG RUN…

    Communism doesn’t’ work because people are selfish, and minimize their productivity whenever possible. So it rapidly degenerates into authoritarianism.

    Fascism doesn’t work because people are selfish and use power to create authoritarianism by incremental control of every fascism of life.

    Social Democracy doesn’t work because people are selfish and use majority rule to maximize rents and redistributions until the polity is unable to adjust to shocks, resulting in the only means of governance fascism of totalitarianism.

    Classical Democracy worked reasonably well because the houses formed a market for exchanges between classes in homogenous nations. But people are selfish, and despite the common law, use of majority rule that overrides common law create the opportunity and incentive to seek rents and construct social democracy.

    Nomocratic Capitalism will works best because natural law both allows only productive, fully informed, warrantied trade and prohibits externalities, whether in private or common markets because it enforces trades rather than justified-takings, and because it is impossible to obtain power since the only power is consent (rule of law).

    Anarcho-capitalism doesn’t work because that much selfishness prohibits the formation of the commons necessary for the competitive survival of a polity.

    Curt Doolittle,

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 17:04:00 UTC

  • #libertarian #conservative #Trump #NRx

    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/823629131258728450/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=823629131258728450(funny) #libertarian #conservative #Trump #NRx https://t.co/kHd7twr9Sf

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 15:31:00 UTC