Theme: Governance

SORRY. I KILLED ANARCHISM (DENIAL OF REALITY), AND POSSIBLY LIBERTY (BEGGING FOR PRETENSE OF SOVEREIGNTY).

(and I love taunting the faithful with such statements)

—“Are you an anarchist or not? There is only one social law and it is absolute, axiomatic, eternal, objective, and universal natural law- the law of private property.”— Chris Anpropian

That is an interesting statement. But until you define the scope of private property it’s actually non-rational (untestable) one: a logical deception demanding the use of substitution for an undefined (property) term.

If you define the scope of property using rothbardian ghetto ethics, you will be unable to use praxeological reasoning to construct an explanation of the incentives under which such a polity can form and persist. If you define it as Hoppian ethics, you will not be able to construct an explanation of the incentive of how a polity can form and persist in competition with other polities. if you rely on property in toto (demonstrated property), you will be able to construct a polity that can form, survive, and compete.

There is a reason why the american west was a province of the american empire, a reason why eastern europe hosted jews as polish, lithuanian, and russian provices, a reason the german princedom’s existed under french and italian papacy as provinces, a reason why the icelandic experiments existed as danish provinces, a reason why greek settlements existed as greek provinces, and so on: to hold (squat) territory at low cost on behalf of an empire that could afford to defend but not afford to administrate it.

There exists one objective law of voluntary cooperation: full reciprocity: the non imposition of costs against the costs born by another without having imposed costs against the costs born by another and so on – leaving only productive, fully in formed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, limited to productive externalities as the possible means survival. In other words: markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, production of commons, production of polities, production of group competition against other polities.

One does not create excuses why another will not retaliate. Others will not retaliate against productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges, limited to productive externalities. That would be irrational, and man is neither moral or immoral, but merely rational in the pursuit of his reproductive, and therefore cooperative, strategy.

quod erat demonstrandum.

I killed jewish and german anarchism and left the fully reciprocal natural law of sovereign men as the only possible means of obtaining a condition of sovereignty in fact, liberty by permission, freedom by utility, and subsidy as insurance.

There has only ever been one source of sovereignty: the organized use of violence to create a condition of perfect reciprocity by the total suppression of parasitism.

Curt Doolittle

The Law of Nature and of Men.

The Philosophy of Aristocracy

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine