Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • WASHINGTON STATE VIRTUE SIGNALING (a) washington until now has never experienced

    WASHINGTON STATE VIRTUE SIGNALING

    (a) washington until now has never experienced the problems of underclass immigratino, in no small part becuase i) like oregon, no black immigration, and ii) no labor immigration, only technical immigration.

    (b) virtue signaling because of accident is a form of deceit – a lie. Washington remained a paradise precisely because it never had to encounter the problems until now. I was just in Redmond. MIcrosoft will not persist. That’s just in the numbers. When it fails, Redmond will look like ROChESTER NY after the fall of Xerox/Kodak. And left leaning seattleites will get their dream: AN INCREASE IN THE DEMAND FOR AUTHORITARIANISM BECAUSE OF A DECREASE IN HOMOGENEITY OF CULTURE, ABILITY, AND INTERESTS.

    This is what separates the west from the east: eliminate the demand for authority, or increase the demand for authority. Europeans discovered government without rule. But since the socialist era, the underclass has been sold a present pseudoscientific religion of perpetual consumption, just as the ancient world’s underclass was sold a future supernatural religion of perpetual consumption in the afterlife.

    Lies for fun and profit. Burn the roman empire to the ground through immigration and invasion, and conversion via lies. Burn the Anglo-German empire to the ground through immigration, invasion, and conversion via lies.

    We can take the european route of profiting from rule that reduces the underclass and the demand for authority, or take the middle eastern route of profiting from rule that increases the underclass by increasing the demand for authority.

    Our european method produces egalitarian peers consisting of genetically middle class majority, and the middle eastern method produces majority underclass of competing tribes the rule of which requires authority.

    So choose an america of Castes that looks like India today, and Brazil in the making – or choose a europe made of many small homogenous middle class polities, consisting of equalitarian peers.

    There is no method by which we can make the underclass otherwise. It is the scale of the underclass the determines the possible methods of rule.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-14 15:37:00 UTC

  • “Russians also celebrate Trump’s unfiltered stream-of-consciousness diatribes as

    —“Russians also celebrate Trump’s unfiltered stream-of-consciousness diatribes as signaling a welcome end to America’s hypocrisy and condescension.”—Foreign Policy

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-13 20:58:00 UTC

  • DEFINITION: CIVIL SOCIETY 1 – Government Organizations (involuntary production o

    DEFINITION: CIVIL SOCIETY

    1 – Government Organizations (involuntary production of formal institutions) The ‘First Sector’ of society.

    2 – Business Organizations (voluntary production of production) “The Second Sector of Society’

    3 – Civil Organizations (voluntary production of commons) “The Third Sector of Society”

    Civil society consists of the set of non-governmental, non commercial, organizations and institutions by which citizens bring their will into fruition. It includes the family, private relations, and volunteer organizations.

    The ‘tiny privileged countries” of the north sea have effectively grown their governments from their civil society orders. This differs from the larger states that formed central governments across multiple areas, families, tribes, and often subcultures.

    American civil society was rich until attacked by the government.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 18:32:00 UTC

  • THE NEW CHURCH AND THE OLD If the catholic church will no longer crown worthy mo

    THE NEW CHURCH AND THE OLD

    If the catholic church will no longer crown worthy monarchs, then we must replace the church. For all its services, that is the one that most transformed our civilization for the better. There is no better government than christian monarchy under natural law, and houses of parliament that allow for the creation of commons in a market between the classes.

    if there is to be a future church, one restoring natural law, one restoring the monarchy, and one restoring the west – then this is our sole purpose: to certify those who govern by natural law and the law of nature, and to prosecute and kill those who do not.

    All the other service that a new church most provide are those that can be categorized as education and training.

    The training of the sovereign mind of stoics.

    The training of behavior in the (sovereign) sacred commons

    The training of the tradition and ritual of the family

    The training of arts, crafts, and sciences in the markets for production, commons, polities and transcendence.

    No more lies.

    Truth is enough.

    We have heroes a plenty without inventing false ones.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 15:21:00 UTC

  • DENY POTENTIAL ALLIES THE FIELD Part of winning the war against the left’s jewis

    DENY POTENTIAL ALLIES THE FIELD

    Part of winning the war against the left’s jewish pseudoscientific, puritan and german psuedo rational, and french moral, and islamic reactionary movments is denying your allies in the libertarian and the right, their fantasies. It is easy for them to concentrate their forces upon us, prior to concentrating their forces upon each other.

    Ending traditional conservatism wasn’t necessary -it failed despite access to power. Ending optimistic conservatism wasn’t necessary – it failed despite access to power. Ending neoconservatism wasn’t necessary – it failed despite access to power. Ending libertinism (Libertarianism) was a bit harder because it was such a failure it never obtained access to power with which to demonstrate their failure. Ending the Christian 88’ers is even harder because they have no chance whatsoever of obtaining power, and demonstrating failure while in power. Any more than their peers, the Jewish communists and socialists have of obtaining power. It is harder to defeat libertarians because of the pseudoscientific and anti-historical bulwark that they have created – sufficient for an attempt at constructing a new religion. And it’s even harder to defeat the 88’ers because they have neither the intellectual bulwark to defeat, nor the evidence of failure, nor the power during which they can demonstrate their failure.

    On the other hand the demonstration of the failure of the 88’ers is their fantasy that they can lead the very revolution that they seek to obtain, by intellectual argument, moral imperative, or obtaining and holding power.

    The 88’ers are just soldiers. The libertines just escapists. the merchants just followers. It is up for the warriors and the aristocracy to lead, so that the soldiers have something possible to follow.

    But like their marxist peers, they have the fantasy that they can rule. This fantasy must be ended in order for them to obtain their desired status by possible, and durable means.

    There is only one future available to us that restores the relative position of our classes in relation to other classes: the restoration of our competitive advantage: sovereignty, truth, beauty, and the production of commons against which no other people can compete.

    Everyone thinks they can lead. But we lead because people want us to, and they want us to because we have actionable plans, and we achieve results because we have actionable plans and people who want a leader to inform them how to act in favor of what end.

    If you don’t have ideas, dont have plans, don’t have leaders, and don’t have sufficient number of people who can act on those plans as suggested by their leaders, then you are just IN THE WAY.

    You are a useful idiot working in favor of the left against your own people.

    That’s my criticism of the 88’ers.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 12:39:00 UTC

  • NAZI FANTASIES ARE NO DIFFERENT FROM LIBERTARIAN FANTASIES. THE CONDITIONS OF BO

    NAZI FANTASIES ARE NO DIFFERENT FROM LIBERTARIAN FANTASIES. THE CONDITIONS OF BOTH FANTASIES CANNOT BE REPLICATED. THE FUTURE REQUIRES NEW SOLUTIONS/

    Death camps. So what. If you convince the mainstream that the case is overstated that is not the same as saying the case is nonexistent.

    Nope. it would just shift. to ‘so what. it was still bad, and the nazis caused millions to die. It is just jerking off.

    You can read hitler’s writing and read his words, and it is nothing like jefferson’s, churchill’s, or even Marx’s, Trotsky’s or Lenin’s. He was well read. Intelligent. But he places a lot of ‘faith’ in that which he has no reason to. Becaues he was playing what’s called a ‘momentum’ game. He succeeded with it. But momentum in stocks is not the same as profits and productivity in industry. Eventually you’re screwed if you can’t convert it. Hitler didn’t have a plan. He had an ambition. And unable to construct a plan he created a momentum stock. Given that the german civilization could have achieved it on his behalf, given motivation and permission, well… he didn’t so much neeed it.

    You are, and others are, just trying to find an excuse to live in the past in a condition that no longer exists, rather than to construct a future, in the condition that it now exists.

    We can have the same aspirational aesthetic. WE can do it. But we cannot do it the way he did. Those conditions do not exist.

    So wasting time on Nazi arguments is NO DIFFERENT FROM WASTING THEM ON LIBERTARIAN ARGUMENTS.

    It’s the same ‘mental disease’.

    The future is one in which we produce an institutional set of solutions to our problem, and apply violence to enact them, and violence to prevent their reversal, and then we use activisim and those laws to end all competitors.

    we can win competitively. But we cannot win against desirable lies that can be acted upon by women and our underclasses.

    THE WEAK GRASP AT WHAT THEY CAN UNDERSTAND. THE STRONG MAKE WHAT THEY WILL.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 10:27:00 UTC

  • Meyssan RE:Trump I’ll be damned. Spot on. Great read. As a minor suggestion, you

    http://www.voltairenet.org/article195196.htmlThierry Meyssan

    RE:Trump

    I’ll be damned. Spot on. Great read.

    As a minor suggestion, you IMPLY an argument that I would not.

    Like Reagan, Trump operates from a common American moral intuition. He does not fear competitors, but sees them as an opportunity to demonstrate superiority. And within that context, he sees the empire as a burden we can no longer afford. He wants to dissolve that Empire because it prevents us from competing. This is counter intuitive to the bureaucrat and relatively obvious to the successful entrepreneur.

    He has confidence that America can compete militarily, economically, and culturally, if freed from the burden of empire that was necessary – first of independence, second to prevent American reconquest by europeans, third to prevent the American south from political and material ownership of the westward expansion, fourth in the war of German ascension, and fifth to prevent the rise of communism, and now sixth in the islamic war against modernity. (Although I might argue that all these wars are conducted in defense of the enlightenment, and rebellions against modernity.)

    And now we are in an era where American (Anglo) wealth is no longer disproportionately an advantage, and when the techniques by which war is conducted have devolved – eliminating the Peace of Westphalia, and restoring the natural order by which the state no longer has control over non state actors, and as such wars are conducted informationally, economically, culturally, by religious conversion, by immigration, by asymmetric reproduction, by raiding and wearing-down, rather than in the Westphalian model of the war of states conducted exclusively by state actors.

    Trump is intuitive, and practical. He has more in common with generals and entrepreneurs than financiers and bureaucrats. And he has little in common with those of use who are primarily intellectuals and scientists – other than his guidance by evidence and an intuition evolved from evidence.

    So in his world view the current war against modernity (Islam) and the current war against the manufacturer, distributor, marketer, and entrepreneur of modernity (Anglo), is now a war that all civilizations should pay for, given that they have adopted the product of the anglos (modernity).

    For China(River), and Russia(steppe), Europe(forest), and Anglo(island), cultures, Islamism is an equal problem and american competition will be improved by forcing other empires (Civilizations) to bear the cost of what appears to be yet another extremely expensive war of modernity.

    So in the end, I see all his actions as the normal insights, not of intellectuals, not of statists, but of generals, and of entrepreneurs. And I suspect we over-intellectualize his thoughts and actions just as we over intellectualized Reagan’s.

    The entrepreneur and the military strategist do not try to apply forces of coercion so much as create opportunities to win where as little resources as possible can be applied.

    The Donald Uses The Market in all things. That’s his intuition. It is the intuition of the weaker and the poorer middle classes of industries and states. And American can no longer afford to fight as if she is the strongest and wealthiest. We aren’t.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-11 09:09:00 UTC

  • Testimonlialism, Propertariaisnm, Market Government, and Sovereignty are equally

    Testimonlialism, Propertariaisnm, Market Government, and Sovereignty are equally good for all nations. And it is only with in nations that we may in fact be sovereign. Because it is only in nations that we can create the commons necessary to incrementally domesticate, and transcend our families in to the aristocracy we envy, and the gods we seek to be.

    I am not racist. I am a classist in the sense that the evil 80’s and below are a burden for all nations. I am a culturist, in the sense that all cultures consist of myths, traditions, norms, and laws, that either advance sovereignty and transcendence, inhibit it, or actively devolve law, norm, tradition, myth and genetic transcendence.

    There is no extended family that we call ‘nation’ that cannot transcend the animal man, to fully rational human, to transcendent god we seek, if we practice testimony, property, market government, and sovereignty.

    But we must, as we evolved, bear our own costs of that transformation. Otherwise we do not practice sovereignty. We merely practice parasitism.

    The only substantial differences between the races that I have uncovered is verbal acuity achieved by the process of reduction of gender dimorphism through reproductive selection, and reduction in impulsivity achieved by the process of pedomorphic reproductive selection, the demand for rational intertemporal planning caused by cold climate agrarianism, the upward redistribution of consumption and reproduction to the middle and upper classes under various forms of manorialism, and the consistent culling of the lower classes by war, famine, disease, and aggressive hanging or murder of the impulsively criminal.

    Yet in the current era this problem is easily circumvented by a one-child policy except for those that have reached a certain income level.

    By one child policy alone, within a few generations, the underclasses will reduce and the middle and upper classes reproduce, and the functional difference between superstitious, theological, philosophical, and empirical nations will disappear, as demand for comforting falsehood is eliminated, and the information in the normative commons adjusts, and so do all its institutions, to suit the needs of the new distribution of abilities.

    The bottom is far more harmful than the top is beneficial. We need not try to manufacture superhumans. We need only prevent the reproduction of inferior humans – something which the 20th century has inverted – much to our dismay.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-10 15:13:00 UTC

  • WE ARE ARISTOCRACY NOT ELITES “We do not seek to separate ourselves from the sol

    WE ARE ARISTOCRACY NOT ELITES

    “We do not seek to separate ourselves from the soldiers, the workmen, the craftsmen, the modern guild-masters, and the white-collar-toilers of experiment, calculation and planning. Instead, we SERVE THEM in their war of survival against the globalist merchants of empty-words that constitute the membership of the Cathedral Complex: the marketers, advertisers, media, the public intellectuals, the state, and the academy that trains them in the art of empty words.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-10 13:59:00 UTC

  • Громадською організацією «Вчитель» оприлюднена петиція до Президента про прийнят

    Громадською організацією «Вчитель» оприлюднена петиція до Президента про прийняття закону про контроль над владою https://petition.president.gov.ua/petition/33781

    Прошу допомогти донести цю інформацію до широкого кола людей та й підписати таке:

    «Затвердити на законодавчому рівні контроль (постійний діалог) суспільства над владою. Контроль повинен поширюватися на всі гілки влади: виконавчу, законодавчу, судову. Об’єкт суспільного контролю – вищі посадові особи держави і суддівський корпус. Зміст громадського контролю – відповідність діянь вищих посадових осіб Конституції України та недопущення ними, або їхніми підлеглими корупційних дій. За корупційні дії підлеглого повинен нести адміністративну відповідальність – аж до зняття з займаної посади – і його безпосередній начальник. Крім того, зняття з посад тих чиновників або відкликання тих депутатів, які не зможуть довести законність походження власності, що належить їм особисто або членам їх родин, – з обов’язковим подальшим відкриттям кримінальних проваджень проти цих держчиновників та депутатів. Суть механізму контролю: постійна публічна звітність вищих посадових осіб перед усім українським суспільством; плюс обов’язок кожного громадянина країни в разі виявлення невідповідностей дій вищих посадових осіб положенням цього закону вимагати негайного публічного розгляду даного порушення в Національному Антикорупційному Бюро України, яке зобов’язане негайно прийняти рішення по даному запиту. Зростання рівня життя населення, зростання економіки, утвердження незворотності реальних демократичних перетворень належним чином зобов’язане щорічно оцінюватися спільнотою України з виплатою відповідних преміальних вищим посадовим особам країни. Відразу ж по прийняттю закону «Про контроль суспільства над владою», необхідне затвердження цього закону конституційною нормою.»

    Обгрунтування необхідності – в пості «Основний принцип процвітання» на моїй сторінці.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-10 13:46:00 UTC