Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • I counter signaled [fascists] for two reasons: 1) they were attacking me without

    I counter signaled [fascists] for two reasons: 1) they were attacking me without grasping what my arguments result in. 2) the separatist argument for nationalism will fail, and the universalist argument for separatism is succeeding world wide.

    I hate morons who waste my time. And there are three categories of those – one from each radical movement: the less intelligent left, the less intelligent libertarian and the less intelligent fascist.

    I counter signaled ‘being a bitch’, and I”ll continue to counter signal being a whiny bitch, because it’s the political equivalent of jerking off.

    Now I realize the less intelligent need to resort to the arguments they’re capable of when dealing with the opposition, but ‘punching right’ against MY WORK and me is demonstration that I’m correct: they’re stupid.

    You punch right at me, and I”ll punch back. It’s not complicated.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 09:35:00 UTC

  • “It’s getting to the point where you’d have to physically remove all the liberta

    —“It’s getting to the point where you’d have to physically remove all the libertarians in order to bring about a libertarian order”—Chris Lavan

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 15:48:00 UTC

  • “Trump was not hired to do the job of a president, he was hired to be a wrecking

    “Trump was not hired to do the job of a president, he was hired to be a wrecking ball to destroy the Washington establishment.” #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 13:14:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/835115676301996033

  • JOSLIN ON VERTICAL CLASS STRUCTURES AND RULE by Bill Joslin Without accommodatin

    JOSLIN ON VERTICAL CLASS STRUCTURES AND RULE

    by Bill Joslin

    Without accommodating for agency, nomocracy would be limited to either timocracy (rule by property owners) or stratocracy (rule by military rank) or academics (technocracy) exclusively (monopoly).

    Natural Law Nomocracy, as stated above, combines stratocracy (militia), timocracy (property owners), and technocracy (academia) as three paths to demonstrate excellence (meritocracy), three competing Houses for commons creation and management.

    The result is aristocracy (rule by the best of all three houses) and could result in cartel management (houses team up to impose upon the other)

    By grounding in demonstrated agency, Propertarianism allows for ANY meritocratic “house” or path to manifest and thus creates a market for rule.

    Membership into the ruling class via demonstration opposed to permission allows ANYONE who can demonstrate they live by their own will access to rule. This opens up enfranchisement, increasing the vertical size of the ruling class and ensures anyone in the ruling class has skin-in-the-game and proven ability. No Vote, No induction, No invitation – you simply show up with your demonstration in hand – eliminating any monopoly power.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 12:06:00 UTC

  • “If we view liberal humanism as a political religion, leftists are Anglicans and

    —“If we view liberal humanism as a political religion, leftists are Anglicans and libertarians are a Quakerish sect, defending the beliefs of the majority but in a purer form, and only dangerous to the status quo in that they are not willing to actually defend it, or expand its dominion except through peaceful conversion.”—Waylon Hill

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 09:38:00 UTC

  • “Libertarians both demand the creation of a highly virtuous population as a prel

    —“Libertarians both demand the creation of a highly virtuous population as a prelude to their preferred government and strenuously oppose any measure to actually create that virtuous population.”—Waylon Hill

    that is because rothbard did not bring ethics of sovereignty to the table but license for parasitism

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 09:32:00 UTC

  • “Trump was not hired to do the job of a president, he was hired to be a wrecking

    “Trump was not hired to do the job of a president, he was hired to be a wrecking ball to destroy the Washington establishment.” #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 08:14:00 UTC

  • SECESSION A SOLUTION TO CULTURAL WAR? Pat Buchanan: ‘Secularism had been enthron

    http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/is-secession-a-solution-to-cultural-war/#gT0rvAD5mjrpGtAi.01IS SECESSION A SOLUTION TO CULTURAL WAR?

    Pat Buchanan: ‘Secularism had been enthroned as our established religion’

    As the culture war is about irreconcilable beliefs about God and man, right and wrong, good and evil, and is at root a religious war, it will be with us so long as men are free to act on their beliefs.

    Yet, given the divisions among us, deeper and wider than ever, it is an open question as to how, and how long, we will endure as one people.

    After World War II, our judicial dictatorship began a purge of public manifestations of the “Christian nation” Harry Truman said we were.

    In 2009, Barack Obama retorted, “We do not consider ourselves to be a Christian nation.” Secularism had been enthroned as our established religion, with only the most feeble of protests.

    One can only imagine how Iranians or Afghans would deal with unelected judges moving to de-Islamicize their nations. Heads would roll, literally.

    Which bring us to the first culture war skirmish of the Trump era.

    Taking sides with Attorney General Jeff Sessions against Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, the president rescinded the Obama directive that gave transgender students the right to use the bathroom of their choice in public schools. President Donald Trump sent the issue back to the states and locales to decide.

    While treated by the media and left as the civil rights cause of our era, the “bathroom debate” calls to mind Marx’s observation, “History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.”

    Can anyone seriously contend that whether a 14-year-old boy, who thinks he is a girl, gets to use the girls’ bathroom is a civil rights issue comparable to whether African-Americans get the right to vote?

    Remarkably, there was vigorous dissent, from DeVos, to returning this issue to where it belongs, with state and local officials.

    After yielding on the bathroom question, she put out a statement declaring that every school in America has a “moral obligation” to protect children from bullying and directed her Office of Civil Rights to investigate all claims of bullying or harassment “against those who are most vulnerable in our schools.”

    Now, bullying is bad behavior, and it may be horrible behavior.

    But when did a Republican Party that believes in states rights decide this was a responsibility of a bureaucracy Ronald Reagan promised but failed to shut down? When did the GOP become nanny-staters?

    Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

    Bullying is something every kid in public, parochial or private school has witnessed by graduation. While unfortunate, it is part of growing up.

    But what kind of society, what kind of people have we become when we start to rely on federal bureaucrats to stop big kids from harassing and beating up smaller or weaker kids?

    While the bathroom debate is a skirmish in the culture war, Trump’s solution – send the issue back to the states and the people there to work it out – may point the way to a truce – assuming Americans still want a truce.

    For Trump’s solution is rooted in the principle of subsidiarity, first advanced in the 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum by Pope Leo XIII – that social problems are best resolved by the smallest unit of society with the ability to resolve them.

    In brief, bullying is a problem for parents, teachers, principals to deal with, and local cops and the school district if it becomes widespread.

    This idea is consistent with the Republican idea of federalism – that the national government should undertake those duties – securing the borders, fighting the nation’s wars, creating a continental road and rail system – that states alone cannot do.

    Indeed, the nationalization of decision-making, the imposition of one-size-fits-all solutions to social problems, the court orders emanating from the ideology of judges – to which there is no appeal – that is behind the culture wars that may yet bring an end to this experiment in democratic rule.

    Those factors are also among the primary causes of the fever of secessionism that is spreading all across Europe, and is now visible here.

    Consider California. Democrats hold every state office, both Senate seats, two-thirds of both houses of the state legislature, 3 in 4 of the congressional seats. Hillary Clinton beat Trump 2-to-1 in California, with her margin in excess of 4 million votes.

    Suddenly, California knows exactly how Marine Le Pen feels.

    And as she wants to “Let France Be France,” and leave the EU, as Brits did with Brexit, a movement is afoot in California to secede from the United States and form a separate nation.

    California seceding sounds like a cause that could bring San Francisco Democrats into a grand alliance with Breitbart.

    A new federalism – a devolution of power and resources away from Washington and back to states, cities, towns and citizens, to let them resolve their problems their own way and according to their own principles – may be the price of retention of the American Union.

    Let California be California; let red state America be red state America.

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/is-secession-a-solution-to-cultural-war/#vIJMIPah96ZBjj5U.99

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 20:05:00 UTC

  • I ADVOCATE NATIONALISM, AND THE DEFENSE OF THE CIRCUMPOLAR PEOPLE. SO I DONT LIK

    I ADVOCATE NATIONALISM, AND THE DEFENSE OF THE CIRCUMPOLAR PEOPLE. SO I DONT LIKE TO DIS ON RUSSIANS.

    I have been making the Circumpolar argument for a few years now, and the only holdouts are Russians. And they are holdouts for self imposed red-headed-stepchild reasons: internal myths.

    But please don’t put me in a position where I have to dis on Russia Culture. I love russians, and I think american and russian males have more in common than any other two peoples. I envy much of russian life, I just don’t envy what I see as unnecessary relative poverty, and our politician’s inabilty to allow us to use that similarity for mutual gain. I love Ukraine, but want to see her join Poland in european prosperity. And I want the baltics to return to freedom from the crimes the russians imposed upon them. I hate american policy with a passion, and I would exterminate every individual in the federal bureaucracy without remorse – and with celebratory joy. But I also understand that the american deep state evolved and exists to prevent another world war, by forcing states to develop mature economies, secular laws, and aristotelian (secular) science, and to remain within their borders, so that we never have another world war.

    But while we have achieved the defeat of world communism, which was an economic model. We have lost the battle of cultural marxism. And we are being attacked now by the OPPOSITE of everything we aspire to: islam: dysgenic reproduction, economic recidivism, superstitious laws, and anti-science. All of which suit the needs of the vast underclass of the steppe and desert, but threaten the vast middle class of the forest, river, and plain.

    We have reciprocally compatible ideologies both founded on Aryanism. The old german was the best of these ideologies, with anglos the most optimistic, the germans the most realistic, and the russian most pessimistic, for purely territorial reasons. Why can’t we unify on our Aryanism (rule by domestication) and understand our divisions of labor? At present this is because we all continue to beleive our falsehoods. Americans have done no good against islam becuase it is an underclass not middle class civilization. Russians have been right about muslims, mongols, and chinese principly because they must combat them. there is no mediterranean, north sea, or atlantic that protects russia. She must be more ‘on alert’ than the rest of the ‘white’ peoples. Just as the germans had to be more ‘alert’ than the anglo sea faring peoples.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 10:32:00 UTC

  • FASCISM, COMMUNISM, MONARCHY – ONLY ONE OF THEM IS ‘BAD’. to: Robby Daniel Dyer

    FASCISM, COMMUNISM, MONARCHY – ONLY ONE OF THEM IS ‘BAD’.

    to: Robby Daniel Dyer

    I don’t have the time this morning to correct you in detail,

    BUT since you’re a smart enough fellow I’ll give you these points to ponder:

    An unlimited market system allows endemic parasitism others and the commons by externality and this is why it never has or will exist – people won’t tolerate it.

    When you say ‘authoritarian’ rule you mean DISCRETIONARY rule. However, rule of law removes discretion by empirical evolution.

    Under rule of law, under natural law, (non-discretionary rule) a monarch merely functions as a judge of last resort, when the subject under consideration is not one of law but long term consequence.

    A monarchy that collects administrative fees (sales taxes or land rent taxes) on the market it administers (polity), may spend that income however it prefers, and in history, it has been small, and they tend to spend it reasonably well. Because otherwise, as individuals, they are open to assassination – usually by their own family members for threatening their social status.

    So while fascism requires discretionary rule, it remains a viable strategy for the conduct of Total War – which was the reason it was invented: to preserve napoleon’s invention of total war, and apply it to the industrial era.

    While communism requires discretionary rule, it also lacks an incentive structure necessary for a voluntary organization of production, so it requires a vast directorial class.

    So when you include monarchy in that list I am not sure what you are talking about. Because christian monarchy dependend eitehr on the common traditional law, or later natural law, or something in between – the restored roman law. No monarch had full license, and the church mandated that fact – and if one’s rule was ‘uninsured’ by the church it meant it was ‘for sale to all commers’ with license.

    As far as I know ‘perfect government’ consists of natural law, independent judiciary (the west’s original priesthood), a military militia, a hereditary monarchy, a market for commons consisting of multiple houses, a market for the production of goods, services, and information, a market for reproduction (marriage), a market for association.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 08:50:00 UTC