Does Turkey’s Erdogan grasp that he is setting up his country for re-taking by Russia? I mean, I would LOVE for that to occur, and for Russia to restore the orthodox world.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-21 09:43:00 UTC
Theme: Governance
-
THE FAILURE OF LIBERALISM WAS FAILING TO UNDERSTAND IT. Empirically speaking, wo
THE FAILURE OF LIBERALISM WAS FAILING TO UNDERSTAND IT.
Empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism.
The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services.
It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 19:33:00 UTC
-
This is hardly a group for intellectual discourse, but empirically speaking, wom
This is hardly a group for intellectual discourse, but empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism.
The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services.
It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 19:33:00 UTC
-
Mr President you need to use us. If you do not, you will lose the battle. #Trump
Mr President you need to use us. If you do not, you will lose the battle. #Trump You are not “managing your base”.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-18 00:23:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/842894261204992005
-
We’re Creating the Anti-Cosmopolitan Inquisition
WE’RE THE INQUISITION They don’t understand. We’re the inquisition. Our purpose, our function, is to issue verdicts. Once issued, moral men have moral license to commit acts of force, violence, and heady murder. Many branches of Literary philosophy bring you inspiration. They suggest candidate goods. We practice law. Natural Law. We decide only what is bad. We do not choose what is good. Anything not bad is a candidate good. And by our judgements we can license restitution, retaliation, punishment, and death. Truth is enough. With sovereignty, truth, and violence we built the west, and with sovereignty, truth and violence we can restore the west. The most frightening consequence of natural law, is if an individual takes action for which he is not capable of paying restitution from his assets, then his life, property, (and that of his kin) is the only form of restitution possible. The identifying characteristic of the 20th century is the use of political action, the consequences for which individuals cannot pay restitution – except with their lives. We are going to take a lot of life and property with our judgements.
-
We’re Creating the Anti-Cosmopolitan Inquisition
WE’RE THE INQUISITION They don’t understand. We’re the inquisition. Our purpose, our function, is to issue verdicts. Once issued, moral men have moral license to commit acts of force, violence, and heady murder. Many branches of Literary philosophy bring you inspiration. They suggest candidate goods. We practice law. Natural Law. We decide only what is bad. We do not choose what is good. Anything not bad is a candidate good. And by our judgements we can license restitution, retaliation, punishment, and death. Truth is enough. With sovereignty, truth, and violence we built the west, and with sovereignty, truth and violence we can restore the west. The most frightening consequence of natural law, is if an individual takes action for which he is not capable of paying restitution from his assets, then his life, property, (and that of his kin) is the only form of restitution possible. The identifying characteristic of the 20th century is the use of political action, the consequences for which individuals cannot pay restitution – except with their lives. We are going to take a lot of life and property with our judgements.
-
Mr President you need to use us. If you do not, you will lose the battle. #Trump
Mr President you need to use us. If you do not, you will lose the battle. #Trump You are not “managing your base”.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-17 20:23:00 UTC
-
The Four Horsemen of the Reconstruction
Mar 10, 2017 10:17am THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE RECONSTRUCTION 1) Jordan Peterson: Meaning (Opportunity generation) 2) Jonathan Haidt: Causation (Moral division of labor) 3) Curt Doolittle: Decidability (Natural Law) 4) Taleb: Measurement (‘Science’) FYI: Let’s take notice that I have the lousy job of saying ‘no’ – no one is ever going to like me for that. Haidt has the better job of saying ‘why’. Peterson has the best job of saying ‘how’. And Taleb has the hard job of trying to quantify the information necessary to change categorical state when we lack the data that will be produced by AI’s necessary to develop a testable unit of measure.
-
What Happened to the Right?
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE RIGHT? —“What *happened* to the right? Despite the fact that I lean right I often find myself embarrassed by the state of modern conservative thought and its aggressively anti-intellectual tendencies. Today’s conservatives can’t seem to accept evolution or articulate a coherent vision of right-wing principles and theory, yet they descend from De Maistre, Evola, Burke, Mises, Rand, and similar thinkers. Other than you, Moldbug, and a handful of libertarians like Tom Woods and Bob Murphy there is almost nothing interesting happening. What went wrong?”— A Friend They couldn’t find an answer to social darwinism and the fact that western civilization is in fact, darwinian – and that this Darwinianism is the reason for our success. What do you do when you tell the lie of democracy and at the same time have to tell the truth of darwinian evolution? You talk nonsense That’s what —“Ah. So if we don’t want to squander the promise of the Western Aristocratic tradition there’s no avoiding social Darwinism?”— Bingo. We have to TELL THE TRUTH.
-
What Happened to the Right?
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE RIGHT? —“What *happened* to the right? Despite the fact that I lean right I often find myself embarrassed by the state of modern conservative thought and its aggressively anti-intellectual tendencies. Today’s conservatives can’t seem to accept evolution or articulate a coherent vision of right-wing principles and theory, yet they descend from De Maistre, Evola, Burke, Mises, Rand, and similar thinkers. Other than you, Moldbug, and a handful of libertarians like Tom Woods and Bob Murphy there is almost nothing interesting happening. What went wrong?”— A Friend They couldn’t find an answer to social darwinism and the fact that western civilization is in fact, darwinian – and that this Darwinianism is the reason for our success. What do you do when you tell the lie of democracy and at the same time have to tell the truth of darwinian evolution? You talk nonsense That’s what —“Ah. So if we don’t want to squander the promise of the Western Aristocratic tradition there’s no avoiding social Darwinism?”— Bingo. We have to TELL THE TRUTH.