Theme: Governance

  • SIZE OF GOVERNMENT? (AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT) Theoretically, as a rule of thumb,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_sectorTHE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT? (AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT)

    Theoretically, as a rule of thumb, the maximum is 20%. As a rule of thumb, we can produce about a 20% surplus in the long term, and we can accelerate innovation and consumption to raise that number through debt at the cost of increased volatility and risk.

    The US govt is about 15% of the population but, that’s misleading since we use so many contractors. It’s useful for judging the political bias of the people. Everything I’ve read is that it hovers int the 20-22% range in total.

    %GDP is a better judge of government scale. OECD countries range from about 35 to 55%, with the USA hovering near the low end (34%) but this includes financial magic because of petrodollar demand. France is at the high end with 55%. The general western consensus is that between 40-50 is the liberal ideal. And in total taxation we all reach that number.

    But that assumes that the government employees obtain total compensation equal to but not more than the general population.

    My suggestion (My Demand) is that not all countries need be the same, and as such those that suppress the reproduction of the underclass can most easily (and very rapidly) decrease the cost of ALL government burden, and thereby increase the returns of all shareholders (citizens).

    The USA was designed to exit the parasitism of the upper and lower classes by creating a middle class and upper middle class society on new territory. This is the only form of society in which democratic participation can survive. And this experiment has been under attack – successfully.

    The attack has been achieved by replacing arguments over rule of law (morality) with arguments over consumption (economics).

    The best thing we can do is restore rule of law, natural law, common law of reciprocity in not only goods, and services, but information. And therefore restore markets in everything.

    The best thing you can do for your people is eliminate non-professional immigration, and eliminate underclass reproduction. Period. End of story.

    Like all things: as complexity increases, Via-Negativa defeats via-positiva.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-09 10:03:00 UTC

  • So the difference is whether we are colonized by the underclass by dysgenic repr

    So the difference is whether we are colonized by the underclass by dysgenic reproduction and superstition, or we colonize by eugenic upper class by force and law?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 14:01:00 UTC

  • GOVERNMENTS IN TIMES OF CONFLICT OR COOPERATION CHANGE/WAR 1) Socialism = centra

    GOVERNMENTS IN TIMES OF CONFLICT OR COOPERATION

    CHANGE/WAR

    1) Socialism = central control of private and commons for the purpose of conducting warfare on one”s own people, for the purpose of transitioning a backward people. Very strong.

    2) Fascism = Central control of the commons. Private control of production. But limited to Autarkic opportunities. Funding of nationalism. (fascism is a means of conducting economic warfare in times of stress). Very strong.

    3) Napoleonism = total mobilization of the public and private economy for military economic and institutional warfare. Very strong.

    —vs–

    STEADY STATE / COMMERCE

    3) Aristocracy / Monarchy (steady state)

    Private ownership of property and commons. but weak.

    2) Republicanism / Oligarchy / Nobility (steady state)

    Private ownership of property and commons but weak.

    1) Social Democracy (steady State)

    Private ownership of property and commons but weak.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 10:03:00 UTC

  • RETURN TO COLONIALISM? If “multiculturalism” is good, then “colonialism” is good

    RETURN TO COLONIALISM?

    If “multiculturalism” is good, then “colonialism” is good. If multiculturalism is bad, the colonialism is bad. What is the difference between invading others and being invaded by others?

    Multiculturalism is invasion. Colonization is invasion.

    h/t: David Kohler


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 07:19:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-05-07/how-government-literally-makes-people-go-insane


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 07:10:00 UTC

  • LET ME HELP YOU. Stop worrying about france. Democracy is the enemy. You are the

    LET ME HELP YOU.

    Stop worrying about france.

    Democracy is the enemy.

    You are the last hope for your people.

    Are you going to do what it takes?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-07 20:11:00 UTC

  • “Fake everything must die. No more #fakenews #fakescience #fakebanking #fakegove

    —“Fake everything must die. No more #fakenews #fakescience #fakebanking #fakegovernment”— David Mondrus


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-07 12:44:00 UTC

  • A Few Insights 1 – Sovereignty (handling exceptions) is the cheapest form of gov

    A Few Insights

    1 – Sovereignty (handling exceptions) is the cheapest form of government. It is not the most profitable in the short term, but the cheapest to operate, with the lowest overhead.

    2 – Christianity is successful under Aryanism(Markets), because it produces incentives identical to high trust market incentives.

    3 – I’ve been working on ‘Man as the Measure’ for some time, but over the past few weeks have made a fairly big leap in progress, and I’ve tried the argument out on a few people and it seems to click. One of the examples I use is ‘series’ which create a means of measuring qualitative statements. This continues the general proposition that Testimonial grammar and propertarian ethics produce a language of measurements: testable statements.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-06 17:15:00 UTC

  • “Monarchy consists of creating aristocracies within aristocracies until it is no

    —“Monarchy consists of creating aristocracies within aristocracies until it is no longer possible”— Joel Davis


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-06 16:56:00 UTC

  • Transcendence and Sovereignty Were The Last Pieces

    Yep. Transcendence and Sovereignty were the last pieces. In the end, warriors make rule possible, but Judges rule. In the monopoly of soldiery officers rule, and in the market of cooperation judges rule. Judges and Officers provide the same function under positiva (military) and negativa (market) organizations. The question is only which method judges use to rule. And there is only one scientific, logical, true, and perfectly decidable method by which judges *can* rule, and that is Reciprocity: The Natural Law of Sovereign Men. The west has always been poly-narrative. With each class evolving its own narrative. And with each class narrative justifying its role in the natural law of sovereign men. The cult of sovereignty for the aristocracy, the cult of law for the priesthood of the aristocracy, the cult of philosophy for the middle aspirational classes, and the cult of religion for the laboring classes, and the cult of rejection, rebellion, and escape by the undesirable classes. And in turn, there is only one method of producing Sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and sufficient surplus for subsidy, and this is via the incremental suppression of parasitisms in all its forms, producing sovereign men, and eliminating parasitic men – leaving only means of survival in markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons, and production of polities. The monarchy provides the judge of last resort in war, the judiciary the judge of markets, and the officer corps the commander of the monopoly that is war. And so, as long as the men willing and able to fight for sovereignty are trained in, and participate in, a local militia, a regional regimental system, and are trained by a national army, in exchange for rights of public speech, access to territorial and capital ownership, and participation in the choice of commons, then because of their arms and their numbers, no usurper can deprive them of sovereignty; and because of their investment and advantage from it, they will preserve their sovereignty, and because of their universal standing in courts of natural law, they will have incentive and peaceful and productive means of preserving their sovereignty, through the incremental suppression of all parasitism of which they are aware. Men must create a market for the suppression of parasitism, by in turn creating a market for cooperation, because of the market for violence that is the result of a large militia of diverse personal but homogenous collective, interests. There is but one method of obtaining and preserving the sovereignty, necessary for the production of agency, necessary for the transcendence of man, and that is the organization of a franchise (corporation) of warriors of sufficient number, with sufficient incentives, and sufficient institutional means, that the only conditions that prevent conflict and preserve cooperation. The advantage of this order is that we preserve our original innovation: maneuver (what we call today ooda-loops) because of the distribution of decision making to the lowest possible level of the organization: a market for heroism in battle. We developed markets in everything, because markets adapt faster and innovate faster than all alternatives. And for a small population of people, the use of excellence(professionals) and technology (excellence), and markets (maneuver) is simply *faster* in all dimensions than all larger and slower alternatives. He who adapts fastest and best has the advantage. Because the first and last enemy of all is TIME.