Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE WON: BY SEIGE —“I’ve seen police of my own country, beat u

    HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE WON: BY SEIGE

    —“I’ve seen police of my own country, beat up women and children, but they cuck hard when dealing with minorities who spit on national flags and curse them. Don’t count on them, they’ve been trained their whole life to obey to the system.”– Stefan Rex

    You ask the police and military and judiciary to opt in. You prosecute those who don’t. The nation depends on the illusion of power. The economics of order dictate that the ability to maintain order is limited to the normative level of suppressible crime.

    If instead, we redirect energies from crime to territorial asset protection, then the crime will expand. If we prosecute those who fail to opt in, suppression will decline, and our success and crime will expand.

    If we are successful at suppression of transportation of goods, fuel, power, and information, the economy will collapse, and crime and rebellion will overwhelm the ability of the state to maintain order.

    If we have given demands *that are possible to meet, and solve everyone’s problems by separation* then the population will prefer separation and it’s contentments with conquest and its discontent.

    You can think like a democrat monopolist seeking permission from the state, or you can think like an economist and a general trying to collapse the frail system of incentives that makes the state possible.

    You do not storm a castle. You do not rebel against an army in a castle. You burn the fields, cut off the water, and stop all transport and trade, and people in the castle surrender or die from deprivation.

    The western way of war (See Van Creveld) is to resolve issues quickly before they lead to the accumulation of asymmetric power. But once one accumulates asymmetric power, the only solution is *SEIGE*.

    In fifth generation warfare, small numbers of men, who can hide among their oppressors, can conduct a siege just as muslim raiders conducted a siege against european, byzantine, persian, egyptian, and levantine civilizations.

    Siege wins – always.

    Thus endeth the lesson.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 12:18:00 UTC

  • HOW CIVIL WAR IS PLAYING OUT by James Santagata Fascinating watching this play o

    HOW CIVIL WAR IS PLAYING OUT

    by James Santagata

    Fascinating watching this play out.

    1. Left owns the street, State does nothing.

    2. Alt-right (rather than Cuck-right) comes out and marches. Gets beat up., State does nothing.

    3. Alt-right, regroups, muscles up, stands toe-to-toe beats down left, States comes racing in to save left.

    At some point the State will go toe to toe with the Alt-right and that is when it becomes strategic to make sure that members of the state realize they had better stay home to protect loved ones. That is, go and patrol if you like but your home and family is not safe. Trust me. They will not patrol. Those that do are made a very messy example of.

    That is how the civil war will play out. One cannot concentrate forces everywhere. If you make the responders unwilling to respond, then the only solution is the military, and that is what we want.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 11:11:00 UTC

  • YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND: DEMONSTRATING THERE IS NO RULE OF LAW You don’t really und

    YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND: DEMONSTRATING THERE IS NO RULE OF LAW

    You don’t really understand what is going on. The government folded to the 60’s violence in under three weeks. The right is merely attempting to work within the law to demonstrate that there is no law. Once they demonstrate that there is no law, they will no longer work within the law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 10:53:00 UTC

  • REVOLUTION COMES As far as I know: (a) the purpose of the event was to respond t

    REVOLUTION COMES

    As far as I know:

    (a) the purpose of the event was to respond to the destruction of monuments to civil war heroes who had fought northern aggression.

    (b) The night before false reports were made by Antifa/BLL members in attempts to cause police to intervene. They fled. The police arrived, determined the demonstrators were operating within the law.

    (c) the demonstrators had a permit for the demonstration and were operating within the law.

    (d) they were moving to the part where they had a permit for the demonstration.

    (e) despite the permit the police broke up the demonstration and drove the demonstrators into large numbers of antifa-BLL who have, in every single meet, been the originators of violence.

    (f) they defended themselves.

    (g) some f–king lunatic got angry and ran over some leftists. And the right will crucify him for it (and is doing so this morning), whereas the left lauds their people for violence.

    You don’t really understand what is going on. The government folded to the 60’s violence in under three weeks. The right is merely attempting to work within the law to demonstrate that there is no law. Once they demonstrate that there is no law, they will no longer work within the law.

    Revolution comes. The era of a single federal government is going to end. Because there is just too much difference between the regions.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 10:52:00 UTC

  • Identity does not solve the problem for others who do not want to organize by id

    Identity does not solve the problem for others who do not want to organize by identity because their identity is worth sh-t.

    So if you solve for liberty then everyone separates by whatever means they want.

    Fighting for identity is just *stupid*. Fighting for everyone’s liberty to organize however they want, solves everyone’s problem INCLUDING those who want to separate by kin identity becuase their kin-identity is NOT sh-t.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 10:39:00 UTC

  • REDISTRIBUTION IS THE NATURAL OUTCOME OF KINSHIP POLITIES *Socialism* in the sen

    REDISTRIBUTION IS THE NATURAL OUTCOME OF KINSHIP POLITIES

    *Socialism* in the sense of *redistribution* is always a natural outcome for every polity by the fact of sheer numbers. The problem is, that homogeneity is required in order for such redistribution to occur without conflict between kin groups. And truth and an independent scientific (truthful) judiciary is required to prevent its transformation into priesthood parasitism – which is what we have seen across the west.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 10:31:00 UTC

  • kings were fairly good in germanic nations because they generally governed kin a

    kings were fairly good in germanic nations because they generally governed kin and near kin. It is in a king’s natural interest to produce a middle class polity from which he can draw wealth. It is in his natural interest to virtue signal for having done so. One does not need to ‘be’ anything other than dependent upon income(middle), and limited by the militia(all) and the judiciary(elite) and the church(lower).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 17:15:00 UTC

  • OCCUPATION FORCES ARE NOW IMPOSSIBLE —“America never lost in Vietnam, Iraq, an

    OCCUPATION FORCES ARE NOW IMPOSSIBLE

    —“America never lost in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. It won decisively on them. But its failed as an occupation force. The last successful occupational power is China (in Tibet).”— Anon

    Why?

    1 – Armies are smaller in number, with greater use of technology and higher dependence upon special forces. IOW they rely on high asymmetry of organization, technology, and skill (just as early europeans relied upon contractual (voluntary) organization and maneuver, bronze/horse/wheel, and professional warriors.

    2 – Advances in small arms – particularly RPG’s and explosives – have made very small numbers of men who can retreat into natural terrain both urban, suburban and rural, very powerful against occupation forces.

    3 – Armies of occupation require vast numbers, where the cost of asymmetry of power assists in maneuver. And concentration of forces (all men are cavalry so to speak), but occupation requires vast numbers of men who are relatively cheap – and a high tolerance for losses.

    4 – Large populations are a detriment not a benefit and this will increase going forward. Population beyond the level necessary to produce a competitive economy, and sufficient surplus to produce a professional military, there is no value to population. Population will increasingly be a detriment. So occupation of territory for other than as a defensive means *against populations and disordered populations* is no longer meaningful.

    5 – The logical tactic is to kill large numbers of unnecessary people in order to obtain access to resources, or to transport resources and goods. Because population, labor, and their market for consumption is now a detriment rather than an asset. Small, homogenous, high trust, high intelligence, technologically advanced, populations where we can concentrate redistribution will rapidly become a primary asset of any polity. This is the consequence of the near zero value of labor, and the near zero value of non-self-organizing population.

    6 – The only thing preventing strategic adaptation to the low value of population and low value of extra territory is the benevolence of major powers under democratic and popular rule. This is because a government who would do such things would be put into question by their own people. But there is zero reason to believe this sentiment will remain.

    7 – The strategy for small states is to create a nearly universal militia, a small special forces military, and a number of nuclear weapons. The strategy for responsible states is to prohibit the possession of nuclear weapons to primitive states and economies.

    The uncomfortable truth.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 09:11:00 UTC

  • Bill Joslin The intersection between sanity signals (yes a real thing) and virtu

    Bill Joslin

    The intersection between sanity signals (yes a real thing) and virtue signals defines the Overton window: the range of acceptable opinions one can hold.

    Policing the Overton Window extends from the desire to preserve social capital. By policing the Overton Window, one frames parasitic modes of power as ‘insane’ while acting to preserve social power – the foundation of parasitic behavior.

    Essentially, policing the Overton Window, acts to preserve the opportunity to be a parasite.

    So, why would you do this?

    Sifting fact from Fantasy only requires truth, not signalling. And by truthful methods most geopolitical “conspirators’ are guilty, as are most academic “conspirators”.

    By this measure, the conspiracies which pan out are pushed into “insanity signals”. Powerplays and human animal husbandry, I suspect, are the opportunities one seeks for himself.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 16:22:00 UTC

  • Is your moral intuition an asset or impediment to creating a moral polity?

    Is your moral intuition an asset or impediment to creating a moral polity?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 10:43:00 UTC