Theme: Governance

  • And when to Revolution mortals bend their will, how soon they find fit, those in

    And when to Revolution mortals bend their will, how soon they find fit, those instruments of ill. #Trump Revolution Comes!


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-07 04:16:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/927751687506407424

  • And when to Revolution mortals bend their will, how soon they find fit, those in

    And when to Revolution mortals bend their will, how soon they find fit, those instruments of ill. #Trump Revolution Comes!
  • And when to Revolution mortals bend their will, how soon they find fit, those in

    And when to Revolution mortals bend their will, how soon they find fit, those instruments of ill. #Trump Revolution Comes!
  • And when to Revolution mortals bend their will, how soon they find fit, those in

    And when to Revolution mortals bend their will, how soon they find fit, those instruments of ill. #Trump Revolution Comes!


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-06 23:16:00 UTC

  • Yes, If You Want And Need Socialism, We Want You To Have It.

    I agree. If you want a socialist, equalitarian, discretionary rules society you should create and live in a socialist discretionary rule society. I agree, if you want an aristocratic, meritocratic, rule of law society, then those of us who want that should live in an aristocratic society. So let’s just agree that the big sort is doing this for us anyway, and divide the country up along the obvious lines that exist by voting patterns, and then live in the societies we want. The order of europe was successful because it consisted of small, culturally homogenous states. So lets create a europe of north america and then we can stop fighting about it. Now, the only reason you can say ‘no’ is greed and oppression of one another. And if you want to do that then I’ guess the only solution is war.
  • Yes, If You Want And Need Socialism, We Want You To Have It.

    I agree. If you want a socialist, equalitarian, discretionary rules society you should create and live in a socialist discretionary rule society. I agree, if you want an aristocratic, meritocratic, rule of law society, then those of us who want that should live in an aristocratic society. So let’s just agree that the big sort is doing this for us anyway, and divide the country up along the obvious lines that exist by voting patterns, and then live in the societies we want. The order of europe was successful because it consisted of small, culturally homogenous states. So lets create a europe of north america and then we can stop fighting about it. Now, the only reason you can say ‘no’ is greed and oppression of one another. And if you want to do that then I’ guess the only solution is war.
  • YES, IF YOU WANT AND NEED SOCIALISM, WE WANT YOU TO HAVE IT. I agree. If you wan

    YES, IF YOU WANT AND NEED SOCIALISM, WE WANT YOU TO HAVE IT.

    I agree. If you want a socialist, equalitarian, discretionary rules society you should create and live in a socialist discretionary rule society. I agree, if you want an aristocratic, meritocratic, rule of law society, then those of us who want that should live in an aristocratic society.

    So let’s just agree that the big sort is doing this for us anyway, and divide the country up along the obvious lines that exist by voting patterns, and then live in the societies we want.

    The order of europe was successful because it consisted of small, culturally homogenous states.

    So lets create a europe of north america and then we can stop fighting about it.

    Now, the only reason you can say ‘no’ is greed and oppression of one another. And if you want to do that then I’ guess the only solution is war.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-06 19:02:00 UTC

  • Sovereigntarianism(Territorial) Vs Libertarianism(Migratory)

    A society of Libertarians will always fail to compete. A society of sovereignty arians will always compete. For the simple reason that libertarians ask permission for markets and reject mandatory commons, and Sovereigntarians force compliance with markets and mandatory commons. The problem has always been limiting access to political power so that the proceeds of market production produce commons not rents. The solution to the production of rents is not libertarianism and parasitic pastoralist scope of property, but rule of law, and productive territorialist scope of property.
  • SOVEREIGNTARIANISM(TERRITORIAL) VS LIBERTARIANISM(MIGRATORY) A society of Libert

    SOVEREIGNTARIANISM(TERRITORIAL) VS LIBERTARIANISM(MIGRATORY)

    A society of Libertarians will always fail to compete. A society of sovereignty arians will always compete. For the simple reason that libertarians ask permission for markets and reject mandatory commons, and Sovereigntarians force compliance with markets and mandatory commons. The problem has always been limiting access to political power so that the proceeds of market production produce commons not rents. The solution to the production of rents is not libertarianism and parasitic pastoralist scope of property, but rule of law, and productive territorialist scope of property.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-06 11:22:00 UTC

  • Sovereigntarianism(Territorial) Vs Libertarianism(Migratory)

    A society of Libertarians will always fail to compete. A society of sovereignty arians will always compete. For the simple reason that libertarians ask permission for markets and reject mandatory commons, and Sovereigntarians force compliance with markets and mandatory commons. The problem has always been limiting access to political power so that the proceeds of market production produce commons not rents. The solution to the production of rents is not libertarianism and parasitic pastoralist scope of property, but rule of law, and productive territorialist scope of property.