Original Diagram of Ternary Logic of Social Organization https://t.co/8dREjlb8v8

Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 16:31:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744396379760230462

Original Diagram of Ternary Logic of Social Organization https://t.co/8dREjlb8v8

Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 16:31:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744396379760230462
smart question.
In simple terms the level of technology determines the means by which to measure the behavior of citizenss. Relgion (reputation), Law (reputation), Credit (reputation), and unfortunately Social Scores (reputation), all increase the resolution of judgement of an individual and either increase (rarely) or decrease (often) his or her opportunities, thus imposing a cost on deviation from the traditions, norms, rules, and laws.
I would suggest a thought for you to consider, that all technology either increases the amount of available energy, decreases the cost of available energy, or decreases the cost of and therefore reduces time and space, as well as the information recording and transport in that time and space.
The most important property of a polity is rule of law and the deviation from natural law in that rule of law. For that reason one must ‘grow’ a polity starting with a military, then a judiciary, then a government, then a market, and only then can one have participatory government where we battle for preference of commons.
Reply addressees: @TheFlushening
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 16:22:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744394131013500932
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744391617836982531
FWIW: turns out you need a ‘decider of last resort’. And a monarchy is the optimum position for that role. Unfortunately we must enshrine that role in our constitutions. In the UK it’s there, but like all other monarchies in europe they are trying to outlast this era until the…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 14:14:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744361981140746500
Reply addressees: @riboster @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744359496636416263
Correct. Urban city states and suburban and rural territorial states. For the simple reason that they have opposing interests in the rules of the commons because they are polar opposites in opportunity costs and responsibility for commons.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 14:02:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744358974391042465
Reply addressees: @ShorterboyMs @JDPARIZEE70
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744304427270648192
RT @curtdoolittle: @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne The fact that Putin (rather the Chinese, Russians, Poles, Hungarians, and the Western ri…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 13:25:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744349719298478100
The fact that Putin (rather the Chinese, Russians, Poles, Hungarians, and the Western right) are correct on culture and genetics is not the same as correct on government and economy. The only reason russia is a decaying drunken tubercular population collapse instead of as wealthy as norway is the Putin Regime’s attempt to restore the soviet union and russian empire, and this massive corrupt kleptocracy that drains every locale to keep Moscow and St Petersburg from rebellion.
I’ve tried to buy companies in Russia. It’s impossible. They have three sets of books. And the moment you make any money at all the corruption mafia steps in to milk it, and if you’re somehow successful they simply use art and artifice to take it from you. Russians are still serfs.
So would you rather blame yourself for not taking to the streets in large numbers to end the cultural-marxist, sex-marxist, and race-marxist abrahamic warfare against our people via the credentialists, when that is possible, or blame yourself for the incapacity to overthrow a government happy to use violence against the people?
The fact that people are lazy and cowardly on the right, is different from whether the alternatives to our economy and rule of law are even worse.
We can fix the crisis, even if it requires mass deportation (repatriation), and a purge of academy, media, and state. But putin’s cabal is far worse than the system we have now.
It is in the nature of the disenfranchised masculine right to want simple and quick answers to hard problems, but that is exactly why the left wins: because they simply keep the pressure on (they’re cognitively feminine and use the female method of warfare by sedition) and incrementally work toward their ends.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 13:24:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744349470471430144
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744280898218959246
I don’t disagree. That is still different from my point that the problem is endemic to the manipulation of the system by the enemy not the system itself.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:31:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744169808806006869
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744167126586294295
Again. Victim theory. Blame avoidance.
There is no reason you can’t, like hungary has, or like poland just did, end asylum, and prohibit further immigration, or engage in forcible repatriation, and withdrawal of all support and subidy, and criminalize employment, housing, or protecting those people.
That isn’t an EU or a NATO or a USA problem it’s a Czech problem. So why aren’t you blaming the man in the mirror, and every other man in the mirror letting it happen?
We have to clean our own houses (rooms, countries, civilizations).
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:13:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744165304777797632
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744164213113667652
IS NATO IMPERIAL OR FEDERAL?
Remind me again how long the Czech people resisted the Germans, then the Hungarians, then the Russians, then the soviets? For a time the country ceased to exist. In 1968 it only took the soviets seven days. And how would the people resist them today? Or resist anyone else for that matter? And so, what is the ‘price’ for the privilege of the sovereignty the Czech people have today? And what is the social, economic, political, and strategic value of EU and NATO participation vs those who lack it?
While you are correct that the Enemy rides on the postwar institutions, that does not mean the the postwar institutions are flawed, or that there is a superior alternative, other than an a compulsory EU military and the higher taxes to pay for it, it only means we have not (yet) ended the capacity of the enemy to undermine our people and our governments (which is our organization’s mission.)
The global anglosphere, and the continental germanosphere would much prefer not having to carry the burden of ‘poor europe’ but, and France would love to contain Germany as the dominant power over the continent, just as would Russia. So an EU military with USA levels of funding and participation, would radically benefit the USA and the Anglosphere whose only concerns are naval and air, and have nothing to do with land wars. The problem is the total EU military spending at 200 billion is 1/4 of the US spend of 800 billion, despite the EU population being 510 million versus the US only 425 million, and the EU gdp of 19.x Trillion almost equal to the US’s 20.x Trillion. So why is europe riding on american people when the postwar agreement was for the purpose of rebuilding europe into a peer again? Only to have it be the child that stays at home and pays no rent?
So, fight the right enemy. Federation and the cost of federation is the only possible means of both retaining identity, sovereignty, and self determination within the limits tolerable by other members of the federation – which usually means defection to aide a foreigh power, or engaging in trade with foreign powers at the expense of members of the federation.
After all that is the value of federation: shared defense, shared trade policy, shared insurance against disaster and crisis, and credit capacity to insure all the above.
I want our people to live in safety and prosperity, and to end the second abrahamic destruction fo europe and if necessary contain it forever as the indians, russians, and chinese seek to do. That does not include however throwing babies out with the bathwater because of internl failures that can be corrected more easily than the entirety of the system can be replaced if lost.
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:01:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744162423618072577
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744148044642181613
In the converse of the Iranian, Russian, Chinese want of empire in the face of the desire and demand for self determination by other countries, why is it that countries so actively seek to join the EU (europe) and NATO (the west)? In fact, who seeks alliance with the restoration… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1743185300820484253
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 23:38:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744141461317116083