Theme: Governance

  • anarchist = pastoralist = the losers of the aristocratic revolution. Sovereignti

    anarchist = pastoralist = the losers of the aristocratic revolution.

    Sovereigntist = territorialist = winners of the aristocratic revolution.

    The weak always complain about paying the cost of holding territory so that they can impose the order of property rights the strong desire.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-23 22:14:00 UTC

  • anarchist = pastoralist = the losers of the aristocratic revolution. Sovereignti

    anarchist = pastoralist = the losers of the aristocratic revolution. Sovereigntist = territorialist = winners of the aristocratic revolution. The weak always complain about paying the cost of holding territory so that they can impose the order of property rights the strong desire.
  • THE NEXT AMERICAN REVOLUTION The unification of north and south in the declarati

    THE NEXT AMERICAN REVOLUTION

    The unification of north and south in the declaration and constitution was always contentious. We had our first attempt at secession just after the war of 1812. Our next in the civil war. vast immigration and the depression that followed, disunity. The world wars created unity. The marxist/postmodern insurgency restored the original demands for secession. The reason for the original failure was fear of re-conquest by europe. The reason for the civil war failure was the profitability of the westward expansion and the threat that the industrialized north would be reduced to a marginalized minority and the west and the south the majority – and slavery is merely the primary driver by which that economic and political reality was perpetuated. The 1960s repeated the process. ANd today we are going thru it again.

    The difference today is we are no longer fighting over the profitability of westward expansion, but the profitability of homogeneous territorial peoples and heterogeneous. Or stated differently “the profits from immigration as a vehicle for selling off a conquered conteintent, and the profits of selling them consumer goods, is now neutralized by the world having caught up to western technology and institutions. What the world cannot catch up to is western demographics and culture. Because as far as I know no other people are capable of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-23 14:46:00 UTC

  • The Next American Revolution

    The unification of north and south in the declaration and constitution was always contentious. We had our first attempt at secession just after the war of 1812. Our next in the civil war. vast immigration and the depression that followed, disunity. The world wars created unity. The marxist/postmodern insurgency restored the original demands for secession. The reason for the original failure was fear of re-conquest by europe. The reason for the civil war failure was the profitability of the westward expansion and the threat that the industrialized north would be reduced to a marginalized minority and the west and the south the majority – and slavery is merely the primary driver by which that economic and political reality was perpetuated. The 1960s repeated the process. ANd today we are going thru it again. The difference today is we are no longer fighting over the profitability of westward expansion, but the profitability of homogeneous territorial peoples and heterogeneous. Or stated differently “the profits from immigration as a vehicle for selling off a conquered conteintent, and the profits of selling them consumer goods, is now neutralized by the world having caught up to western technology and institutions. What the world cannot catch up to is western demographics and culture. Because as far as I know no other people are capable of it.
  • The Next American Revolution

    The unification of north and south in the declaration and constitution was always contentious. We had our first attempt at secession just after the war of 1812. Our next in the civil war. vast immigration and the depression that followed, disunity. The world wars created unity. The marxist/postmodern insurgency restored the original demands for secession. The reason for the original failure was fear of re-conquest by europe. The reason for the civil war failure was the profitability of the westward expansion and the threat that the industrialized north would be reduced to a marginalized minority and the west and the south the majority – and slavery is merely the primary driver by which that economic and political reality was perpetuated. The 1960s repeated the process. ANd today we are going thru it again. The difference today is we are no longer fighting over the profitability of westward expansion, but the profitability of homogeneous territorial peoples and heterogeneous. Or stated differently “the profits from immigration as a vehicle for selling off a conquered conteintent, and the profits of selling them consumer goods, is now neutralized by the world having caught up to western technology and institutions. What the world cannot catch up to is western demographics and culture. Because as far as I know no other people are capable of it.
  • Either obey the law or leave. It’s not complicated. Why did he fail to obey the

    Either obey the law or leave. It’s not complicated. Why did he fail to obey the law? Why are progressives selective about obeying the law and why are conservatives NOT selective about obeying the law?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 13:30:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955432467892187136

    Reply addressees: @washingtonpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955430499903856640


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955430499903856640

  • John, I was there when we made the deliberate decision to bankrupt the state bef

    John, I was there when we made the deliberate decision to bankrupt the state before the left could bankrupt the private sector and create their socialist disaster. And we are going to win that particular battle.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 13:27:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955431717870997504

    Reply addressees: @JohnStossel

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955431159311294467


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JohnStossel

    Both parties agree that we must bankrupt future generations https://t.co/D0CPTCplUD

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955431159311294467

  • THE FEMININE POSTMODERN MIND IS NOT LOGICAL, OR RATIONAL but finds our equivalen

    THE FEMININE POSTMODERN MIND IS NOT LOGICAL, OR RATIONAL but finds our equivalent of ‘truth’ in CONSENSUS, wishful thinking, and POWER.

    Make excuses for everything that the universe, evolution, and the incentives of your fellow humans deny you from obtaining without paying the price in physical, intellectual, and emotional costs.

    It’s all theft. Rouseseuianism, Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism are just the modern era’s reaction to the loss of using cheap approval and disapproval to obtain material discounts.

    Once you understand this, you understand everything.

    The female obtains through low cost behavior, high returns.

    Modernity prohibits her from doing so.

    So she simply scales her means of shaming so that her approval obtains her rents.

    This is all there is to it. Really. That’s all there is to Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 08:17:00 UTC

  • The Feminine Postmodern Mind Is Not Logical, Or Rational

    THE FEMININE POSTMODERN MIND IS NOT LOGICAL, OR RATIONAL but finds our equivalent of ‘truth’ in CONSENSUS, wishful thinking, and POWER. Make excuses for everything that the universe, evolution, and the incentives of your fellow humans deny you from obtaining without paying the price in physical, intellectual, and emotional costs. It’s all theft. Rouseseuianism, Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism are just the modern era’s reaction to the loss of using cheap approval and disapproval to obtain material discounts. Once you understand this, you understand everything. The female obtains through low cost behavior, high returns. Modernity prohibits her from doing so. So she simply scales her means of shaming so that her approval obtains her rents. This is all there is to it. Really. That’s all there is to Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.
  • My answer to What would happen if there was an American Revolution where Illegal

    My answer to What would happen if there was an American Revolution where Illegal Immigrants overthrew the American … https://www.quora.com/What-would-happen-if-there-was-an-American-Revolution-where-Illegal-Immigrants-overthrew-the-American-government/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=b14d00c9


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 04:40:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955299105395404800