Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • HAS NO ALLIES, ONLY DEPENDENTS **China has no allies. She only has dependents.**

    https://www.quora.com/Are-China-and-Russia-now-military-allies/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=ddcc003b&srid=u4QvCHINA HAS NO ALLIES, ONLY DEPENDENTS

    **China has no allies. She only has dependents.**

    This principle is central to east asian thought. There are no equals. In all circumstances someone is superior and another is subordinate.

    When confucius could not solve the problem of politics he directed all men to organize into a paternal hierarchy, from the emperor on down to the new born child.

    When chinese history says ‘middle kingdom’ they mean ‘the center of the world’ with them at the top.

    Chinese thought requires the preservation of harmony – meaning non disruption of the status hierarchy. Even if that means doing everything possible to avoid speaking the truth.

    Chinese strategy, is to delay and deceive, while building up offensive and defensive capability, until a competitor can no longer even negotiate, but simply obey.

    This is a very paternal model of thought. It is not necessarily a bad one, for the simple reason that chinese pursuit of harmony, and parenting is somewhat grounded in their (rather questionable) morality.

    That said, they will kill millions of their own happily if necessary, and have far less regard for human life than westerners (or indo europeans in general) do or can even imagine.

    So no, **China has no allies, she has only enemies, subordinates, and candidate subordinates.**

    This is all you really need to understand about chinese policy, culture, and civilization. Just as heroism sovereignty, reciprocity and truth are all you need to understand the west. In this sense we are not very compatible civilizations.Updated Apr 4, 2018, 12:05 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 12:05:00 UTC

  • “The US is the modern equivalent of Rome, the interventions in foreign shitholes

    —“The US is the modern equivalent of Rome, the interventions in foreign shitholes were all about maintaining stability and ensuring that the supply chains are undisturbed. The problem with the US is that it has enshrined the market as a culture.”—Dawid Wella

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 09:32:00 UTC

  • WE ARE ALWAYS WRONG You know, if we had let the soviets expand their ‘communism’

    WE ARE ALWAYS WRONG

    You know, if we had let the soviets expand their ‘communism’ into the islamic countries, they would have crushed islamism, enforced education, and removed muslim illiteracy as well as superstition. Yet their economies would have eventually failed as all socialist economies do. And then they would have transferred to consumer capitalism and markets out of envy rather than resistance.

    We are always wrong. Kings were far better than democracies.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 09:07:00 UTC

  • RT @Hromadske: The main problems of #Ukraine are the lack of rule of law and gen

    RT @Hromadske: The main problems of #Ukraine are the lack of rule of law and general ignorance about the country. – James Brooke, Editor-in…

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 06:32:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981419311695835136

  • Retweeted Hromadske Int. (@Hromadske): The main problems of #Ukraine are the lac

    Retweeted Hromadske Int. (@Hromadske):

    The main problems of #Ukraine are the lack of rule of law and general ignorance about the country. – James Brooke, Editor-in-Chief, @the_ubj https://t.co/S5iOCzYpg9 https://t.co/BgvJnV2yL8

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 02:32:00 UTC

  • Anywhere where men are armed, and there is no alcohol, is safe. The safest place

    Anywhere where men are armed, and there is no alcohol, is safe. The safest place in the world are Military bases, Police conventions, country fairs, hunting clubs, and gun shows. Always will be.Hence why “Esquire” allowed you to carry a weapon: all men of character are sheriffs.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-03 23:34:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981313952390017025

    Reply addressees: @LebellNY @NRA @GOP

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981308621374963713

    IN REPLY TO:

    @BKLYNYer

    Go to following places & possible get killed by random shooter:
    School
    Work
    Movie Theater
    Church
    Concert
    Night Club
    Baseball Field at a Park
    Mall
    List keeps growing @nra @gop can u see ur hands through the blood on them? Where can AMERICANS go SAFELY? I’ll wait. YouTube HQ

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981308621374963713

  • “The choice is between suppressing the underclass via propertarian methods, or w

    —“The choice is between suppressing the underclass via propertarian methods, or watching society return to high infant mortality, ignorance, want and disease, never to rise again.”— Ryan Williams

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-03 16:01:00 UTC

  • THE CASE FOR COMPENSATORY EUGENICS Well, politics like economics is counter intu

    THE CASE FOR COMPENSATORY EUGENICS

    Well, politics like economics is counter intuitive, and in some sense wrong: humans flock to opportunities; humans defect when it’s in their interests, and the central problem is limiting the opportunities that they can flock and defect to, to those that are productive rather than parasitic – which preserves cooperation, at least among others than the underclasses that have no choice. And the only means of protecting against parasitism is competition. And the only means of mediating that competition is the common law of tort – meaning, the common law of non-parasitism.

    In most of history, we lacked control of birth, had high infant mortality, required an entire multi-generational family, if not a clan, to provide sufficient productivity to survive, and as such offspring, despite high mortality, were both a necessity and relatively uncontrollable consequence of sex between people for whom sex, food and other people were the most available forms of entertainment (And release from toil). Agrarians work far harder than pastoralists, who work harder than hunter gatherers. We work less hard but we also lack the benefits of socialization, (sex), and intergenerational protection. In other words, socialization and mindfulness decrease with rates of production.

    The very idea that competition creates harmony at the expense of the underclass is not novel. However, we are no longer producing only malthusian surpluses, we no longer require intergenerational families for insurance, we are no longer prisoners of accidental reproduction, and no longer face high child mortality.

    So, it’s actually pretty simple to pay the unproductive not to reproduce. And this continuously eliminates the unproductive, those who lack ability, and those who lack agency, from the population.

    Now, I do not know why anyone would object to this particular issue other than some sort of status signaling. but then, I don’t understand why status signaling, should not be limited to truthful expression any less than all other forms of truthful express, if in fact, the individual is economically supported by the community.

    The real reason for opposition is the female basalt intuition that sees the world as equal rather than a distribution, and as such fears she lacks the merit to reproduce, and that if she does reproduce this might expose her to conflict with other females, or subject her children to risk because of reproductive inequality.

    The other reason is the priesthood and intellectual salesman’s loss of market share. Since without an underclass the priesthood eventually disappears and turns into public intellectuals. And public intellectuals again lose market share, because the suppression of moral hazard, fictionalism, falsehood, deprives them of the ability to advocate for underclass parasitism.

    At present levels of human ability a distribution around 125, with 2/3 of the is probably the maximum, and probably desirable. I really don’t see any reason that number can’t move higher, but it can’t probably move without direct manipulation of the genome.

    That said, the benefits are LOGARITHMIC above 105.

    The future will be determined, like the present, by the size of our underclasses. The only competitive advantage any society possesses other than territorial resource, is SMALLER UNDERCLASSES.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-03 10:32:00 UTC

  • On the Future of The British Isles (if Not All Scandinavia)

    Economic consumption is, like drugs, or religion, a comforting method of personal, familial, cultural, and political suicide. Some people think about their near term experiences, some about their children’s, some of their peoples long term horizons. (ie: the left, the libertarian, the right.) That which is unique about anglo civilization is incompatible with the faustian bargain that the french-and-german have chosen. The united states will have a second civil war soon because we have resisted returning to the european model of different states, and tried to preserve our inherited british empire in a world where we no longer possess economic and technological asymmetry. Meanwhile Europe, following the USA, assumes that she will achieve american economic and military prowess through unity. This might be possible if divided into protestant, catholic, orthodox civilizations just as american continuity might be possible if divided into Germanic (central), Scotts Irish(southern), Anglo (new england), white “Coastal Islanders” (seattle, portland, san francisco), and Jewish (New york city, Los Angeles). The fact is that the Han, Korean, and Japanese have won the argument: Homogeneity wins over the long term. Ethnicity wins over diversity. Executive government wins over democracy. When I watch the japanese and koreans and now the chinese, I still remember when we were like that – rather than a house, a thousand times divided. The value is not scale but smallness. The only value to scale is war. Small polities produce political, economic, and social equality -because they can. Move capital to people not people to capital. Equilibrate differences in production through trade negotiation. MOST IMPORTANTLY In the coming technological era, when not only phiysical labor but clerical labor is no longer productive, political economic and social asymmetry will increase dramatically, and the returns on popllitical control even more exacerbated than modern medieval and ancient eras. Ergo *the greatest advantage any demographic possesses is homogeneity and a continuously shrinking under class, lower class, and laboring class.* Let each group pay the costs of continuous modernization rather than burdening others. Thi sis the only way to create cooperative rather competing politics and norms. The future is Switzerland or the Levant/India/Brazil/South America. The Anglo Peoples, during the period of expansion, produced a continuous civilization of our own. Britain can either return to her leadership of our people, or continue to decline into a client state of either germany or america. We are not capable of holding the flag any longer. We have been invaded by the third world. And we will now have a civil ar to separate from them.
    Apr 02, 2018 12:16pm

  • On the Future of The British Isles (if Not All Scandinavia)

    Economic consumption is, like drugs, or religion, a comforting method of personal, familial, cultural, and political suicide. Some people think about their near term experiences, some about their children’s, some of their peoples long term horizons. (ie: the left, the libertarian, the right.) That which is unique about anglo civilization is incompatible with the faustian bargain that the french-and-german have chosen. The united states will have a second civil war soon because we have resisted returning to the european model of different states, and tried to preserve our inherited british empire in a world where we no longer possess economic and technological asymmetry. Meanwhile Europe, following the USA, assumes that she will achieve american economic and military prowess through unity. This might be possible if divided into protestant, catholic, orthodox civilizations just as american continuity might be possible if divided into Germanic (central), Scotts Irish(southern), Anglo (new england), white “Coastal Islanders” (seattle, portland, san francisco), and Jewish (New york city, Los Angeles). The fact is that the Han, Korean, and Japanese have won the argument: Homogeneity wins over the long term. Ethnicity wins over diversity. Executive government wins over democracy. When I watch the japanese and koreans and now the chinese, I still remember when we were like that – rather than a house, a thousand times divided. The value is not scale but smallness. The only value to scale is war. Small polities produce political, economic, and social equality -because they can. Move capital to people not people to capital. Equilibrate differences in production through trade negotiation. MOST IMPORTANTLY In the coming technological era, when not only phiysical labor but clerical labor is no longer productive, political economic and social asymmetry will increase dramatically, and the returns on popllitical control even more exacerbated than modern medieval and ancient eras. Ergo *the greatest advantage any demographic possesses is homogeneity and a continuously shrinking under class, lower class, and laboring class.* Let each group pay the costs of continuous modernization rather than burdening others. Thi sis the only way to create cooperative rather competing politics and norms. The future is Switzerland or the Levant/India/Brazil/South America. The Anglo Peoples, during the period of expansion, produced a continuous civilization of our own. Britain can either return to her leadership of our people, or continue to decline into a client state of either germany or america. We are not capable of holding the flag any longer. We have been invaded by the third world. And we will now have a civil ar to separate from them.
    Apr 02, 2018 12:16pm