They took the bait. Stupid. Easy answer: You know, customers are all the same color. You are a customer or you are not.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 13:14:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/986593855620435968
Reply addressees: @LibertarianBlue
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/986593515554705408
IN REPLY TO:
@AllumBokhari
Headline is completely accurate and not a parody https://t.co/6x8qGtiu0V
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/986593515554705408
We will either separate or terminate – and termination of whom by whom is a random outcome. Ergo, as always, the optimum solution to conflict is boycott: nationalism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 07:56:00 UTC
THE LAW OF POLICY
Whenever political decidability is no longer empirical it must of necessity rely on ideology, because empiricism tests reciprocity(equilibrium), and ideology tests extremes(disequilibrium).
Ergo, either one lives by rule of law, markets, empiricism, and equilibrium, or one lives by rule by discretion, bureaucracy, ideology, and disequilibrium.
At present our compromise solution is discretion from the use of proceeds of cooperation (taxation), and rule of law (non discretion) for all activity.
But without nationalism we cannot test nor preserve reciprocity between groups with heterogeneous demands due to heterogeneous distributions.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 07:50:00 UTC
PETERSON ON CHARLOTTESVILLE
Articulate in analysis of the disgust response.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FmX1phv55c
Conservatism = Antibodies.
Disease, and Cure.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 07:44:00 UTC
I’m just staying on message: Understand we are going to enter into conflict. Understand we have offered no solution, just criticism. We will offer a solution then promise conflict. We will opportunistically pursue the three possible lines of conflict. And then concentrate on what ‘works’. And they will fold rather quickly. And if not, we ‘win’ by starving them out. And in not we ‘win’ by the ‘not us’ groups demonstrating their latent tendencies – removing all doubt about our arguments. Apr 17, 2018 12:20pm
I’m just staying on message: Understand we are going to enter into conflict. Understand we have offered no solution, just criticism. We will offer a solution then promise conflict. We will opportunistically pursue the three possible lines of conflict. And then concentrate on what ‘works’. And they will fold rather quickly. And if not, we ‘win’ by starving them out. And in not we ‘win’ by the ‘not us’ groups demonstrating their latent tendencies – removing all doubt about our arguments. Apr 17, 2018 12:20pm
I’m just staying on message:
Understand we are going to enter into conflict.
Understand we have offered no solution, just criticism.
We will offer a solution then promise conflict.
We will opportunistically pursue the three possible lines of conflict.
And then concentrate on what ‘works’.
And they will fold rather quickly.
And if not, we ‘win’ by starving them out.
And in not we ‘win’ by the ‘not us’ groups demonstrating their latent tendencies – removing all doubt about our arguments.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-17 12:20:00 UTC
Others have been saying this lately, but I think I need to repeat it in propertarian context.
1. Exhaustion of INTERPERSONAL Opportunity to Cooperate wins.
2. The Most Intolerant POLITICAL Group Wins.
BE INTOLERANT.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-17 09:13:00 UTC
THE ALT RIGHT IS OVER
(instigation of discussion)
by Christopher O’Brennan
Charlottesville was a failure, but it set a precedent that people, normal people compared to the old school skinheads, can meet in real life to provide solidarity and change.
People traveled from all around the world be there. We shouldn’t do it again where people lose jobs or get arrested, but we should do something that capitalizes on these things.
I have to shill for the United States and the government whenever Russians are involved because they are our rival. I will continue to do so in good faith and loyalty until Americans shake off the libertarian persona towards a North American ethnostate where our Anti-Russian stance will flip.
Until people get serious in opposing the government with a counter American government (which would mean conflict), loyalty to the nation is expected. I feel that is a principled stance. I hope white russians and eastern europhiles can understand that its not personal, by being cool w Russia now under the heat of geopolitical saber rattlings means treason without reason, and that’s dumb.
The alt right is over.
What we have are libertarians civnats who too beta to confront the state. We have quasi-marxists who run around like idiots on the street until dear leader is embarrassed out of the movement. Then we have Roger Stone style anonymous assholes giggling like girls from the comfort of their basements putting dicks in each others mouths who fundamentally believe in nothing but their own craven egos. You have saturation of podcasts and media producers in it for the shekels and satisfying their trolls tearing each other down until there is nothing.
The alt right is dead. Clerical fascism, natsoc, propertarianism, traditional monarchism, and even a virtuous republicanism of honor rather than money will rise from those ashes.
The alt right was coined by Buchannanites, and later stolen by Richard Spencer to mix race with the post modern nastiness of Roger Stone style populist bullying.
It means nothing. They mean nothing. They do not represent me or my people who see their behavior, and believe they are bizarre retrobates.
We have to move forward to be who we were meant to be, and nip bad unnatural ideas in the bud.
We cannot maintain demographics when we do not control the state or state policy. We cannot maintain normative institutional influence if we at under siege by the state. We cannot maintain territorial control if we cannot own our own institutions. Therefore we must move beyond the silly culture of the Alt Right into the right.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-17 07:29:00 UTC
http://disq.us/p/1rsyqhmit is very hard to train an army without real combat that does not cause them to fail. Putin is simply creating a nation out of ukraine by giving men incentives to fight, military men opportunity to learn from fighting, the government incentives to rebuild the military production chain, and foreign governments to provide subsidy and supply.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-16 12:55:00 UTC