Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • Progressives are the Establishment

    by Ely Harman Progressives are the “establishment.” They are not “rebels” they are not “marginalized.” They are the powers that be and they use their institutional power, which they weild through something like 95% of all instititions to crush dissent, to shut down opposition, to silence criticism, and to squelch discussion. They also use their power only for bad, dysgenia, parasitism, lies fraud, corruption, degeneracy, weakness worship, mediocrity, stagnation, decay, uglification, everything that is mean, gross, defective, foul, or inferior and nothing that is excellent, good, beautiful, truthful or pure.

  • Progressives are the Establishment

    by Ely Harman Progressives are the “establishment.” They are not “rebels” they are not “marginalized.” They are the powers that be and they use their institutional power, which they weild through something like 95% of all instititions to crush dissent, to shut down opposition, to silence criticism, and to squelch discussion. They also use their power only for bad, dysgenia, parasitism, lies fraud, corruption, degeneracy, weakness worship, mediocrity, stagnation, decay, uglification, everything that is mean, gross, defective, foul, or inferior and nothing that is excellent, good, beautiful, truthful or pure.

  • “What is your political stance?”— How about Conservative(aristocratic), Libert

    —“What is your political stance?”—

    How about Conservative(aristocratic), Libertarian (rule of law), which means my stance is EUGENIC.

    And certainly not Progressive (priestly), Humanist (rule by discretion), which means DYSGENIC.

    As far as I know:

    (a) we either rule by discretion or rule by law (not legislation but law).

    (b) we either rule by eugenics and wealth, or rule by dysgenics and poverty.

    Because all political orders are deterministic. You either get a massive middle class (classical liberalism), get a caste system (india, south america), or you get a massive underclass (islam).

    Because in the end your relative standard of living is dependent upon the size of your underclass. Really. That’s all it is. Seriously.

    So choose between paying the piper now (conservative wealth and eugenics) or paying the piper later (progressive poverty and dysgenics ).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 13:27:00 UTC

  • constitution was the best yet written, because it attempted to create a “third w

    https://www.quora.com/Do-all-Americans-realise-how-lucky-they-are-For-all-their-shortcomings-they-have-a-prosperous-beautiful-land-with-many-different-ideas-and-people-The-Constitution-which-protects-their-rights-e-g-free-speech-which-is/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=ffbf12ed&srid=u4QvOur constitution was the best yet written, because it attempted to create a “third way” alternative to church or state under Natural Law – a middle class country – but it has been fairly easy to circumvent for the simple reason that the supreme court has no vehicle for ‘returning law to the congress’, and therefore can legislate from the bench. As far as I know the basis of common law is optimum (natural law of tort) and the level of detail in continental law is less open to circumvention.

    Our political system is outright bad, with parties, prime ministers and a monarch empirically superior by all the evidence.

    While conceived as a loose collection of states like europe, we have failed to preserve the independence of the states, and the presidency, and the majority election of the president, has only reinforce that problem.

    As such we have a continent-wide empire where everyone is always angry because each state or region has a different culture with different social, economic, political, and strategic demands.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 20:31:00 UTC

  • Fascism Won. Eugenicists Were Right.

    Um. Fascism = Monopoly. Everyone wants a monopoly – whether left right or center. The west however rose at its unprecedented pace in the ancient and modern worlds, under tripartism and markets for cooperation, while maintaining underclass eugenics (suppression). So basically fascism won. The ‘examples’ being set for the rest of the world are china, russia and saudi arabia – a trend in the research that was identified in the 90’s. Democracy in the 19th and 20th and the French Revolution’s counter-empiricism will be, as in the ancient world, remembered as nothing more than a revolt made possible by temporary excesses in income made possible by european technological superiority and the use of it in colonization. In less than a century that competitive advantage (capital) has been spent down, and the world is dividing again into large caste systems (india, south america, the muslim world) and nationalisms (china, japan, south korea). With the west by fully accidental means, choosing to follow india, south america, and the levant, into permanent class warfare.

  • Fascism Won. Eugenicists Were Right.

    Um. Fascism = Monopoly. Everyone wants a monopoly – whether left right or center. The west however rose at its unprecedented pace in the ancient and modern worlds, under tripartism and markets for cooperation, while maintaining underclass eugenics (suppression). So basically fascism won. The ‘examples’ being set for the rest of the world are china, russia and saudi arabia – a trend in the research that was identified in the 90’s. Democracy in the 19th and 20th and the French Revolution’s counter-empiricism will be, as in the ancient world, remembered as nothing more than a revolt made possible by temporary excesses in income made possible by european technological superiority and the use of it in colonization. In less than a century that competitive advantage (capital) has been spent down, and the world is dividing again into large caste systems (india, south america, the muslim world) and nationalisms (china, japan, south korea). With the west by fully accidental means, choosing to follow india, south america, and the levant, into permanent class warfare.

  • Curt Doolittle Um. Fascism = Monopoly. Everyone wants a monopoly – whether left

    Curt Doolittle Um. Fascism = Monopoly. Everyone wants a monopoly – whether left right or center. THe west however rose at its unprecedented pace in the ancient and modern worlds, under tripartism and markets for cooperation, while maintaining underclass eugenics (suppression). So basically fascism won. The ‘examples’ being set for the rest of the world are china, russia and saudi arabia – a trend in the research that was identified in the 90’s. Democracy in the 19th and 20th and the French Revolution’s counter-empiricism will be, as in the ancient world, remembered as nothing more than a revolt made possible by temporary excesses in income made possible by european technological superiority and the use of it in colonization. In less than a century that competitive advantage (capital) has been spent down, and the world is dividing again into large caste systems (india, south america, the muslim world) and nationalisms (china, japan, south korea). With the west by fully accidental means, choosing to follow india, south america, and the levant, into permanent class warfare.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 10:27:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/30742960_10156298896447264_26276020

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/30742960_10156298896447264_2627602090511302656_n_10156298896437264.jpg (from a friend, from elsewhere)Cam PyperRevolutionary, if your timing is right.Apr 19, 2018 11:07pmJames HalladayI wish you made more videos. Your perspective is so insightfulApr 20, 2018 6:12amCurt Doolittlesoon…Apr 20, 2018 8:14amDaniel Roland Anderson@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle]

    Don’t you dare Robert Jordan us.Apr 21, 2018 1:22am(from a friend, from elsewhere)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 19:59:00 UTC

  • The Decline of Prosperous Cities

    https://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2018/04/18/a-mayors-most-important-job-n2471301 from Walter Williams: —“When World War II ended, Washington, D.C.’s population was about 900,000; today it’s about 700,000. In 1950, Baltimore’s population was almost 950,000; today it’s around 614,000. Detroit’s 1950 population was close to 1.85 million; today it’s down to 673,000. Camden, New Jersey’s 1950 population was nearly 125,000; today it has fallen to 77,000. St. Louis’ 1950 population was more than 856,000; today it’s less than 309,000. A similar story of population decline can be found in most of our formerly large and prosperous cities. In some cities, population declines since 1950 are well over 50 percent. In addition to Detroit and St. Louis, those would include Cleveland and Pittsburgh.”— (via Anoop Verma) Apr 19, 2018 8:18am

  • The Decline of Prosperous Cities

    https://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2018/04/18/a-mayors-most-important-job-n2471301 from Walter Williams: —“When World War II ended, Washington, D.C.’s population was about 900,000; today it’s about 700,000. In 1950, Baltimore’s population was almost 950,000; today it’s around 614,000. Detroit’s 1950 population was close to 1.85 million; today it’s down to 673,000. Camden, New Jersey’s 1950 population was nearly 125,000; today it has fallen to 77,000. St. Louis’ 1950 population was more than 856,000; today it’s less than 309,000. A similar story of population decline can be found in most of our formerly large and prosperous cities. In some cities, population declines since 1950 are well over 50 percent. In addition to Detroit and St. Louis, those would include Cleveland and Pittsburgh.”— (via Anoop Verma) Apr 19, 2018 8:18am