Theme: Governance

  • “I’m living this truth here in Brazil right now. They’ve managed to disarm the p

    —“I’m living this truth here in Brazil right now. They’ve managed to disarm the population 20 years ago. Now criminals are murdering everyone else to protect their right to bear arms. 60.000 people die per year in the process.”— Rodrigo Yoshima


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 23:00:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998337820174569473

  • “I’m living this truth here in Brazil right now. They’ve managed to disarm the p

    —“I’m living this truth here in Brazil right now. They’ve managed to disarm the population 20 years ago. Now criminals are murdering everyone else to protect their right to bear arms. 60.000 people die per year in the process.”— Rodrigo Yoshima


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 19:00:00 UTC

  • Conservatives serve as the white blood cells in the tribe, nation and race. That

    Conservatives serve as the white blood cells in the tribe, nation and race. That’s why we are so easily disgusted, and so intolerant. We are ridding the body politic of disease.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 15:27:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998223590947516416

  • zero tolerance is a good thing

    zero tolerance is a good thing.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 15:23:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998222728841908225

  • zero tolerance is a good thing

    zero tolerance is a good thing.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 11:23:00 UTC

  • Intelligence and Political Affiliation: Scale Causes Regression To The Mean

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-average-intelligence-average-IQ-test-scores-any-calculated-metric-of-the-average-American-conservative/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=54709e6f&srid=u4Qv ALL THREE OF THESE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE (And obvious.) 1) Libertarians(7%) are smarter than Liberals(25%). 2) Republicans(26%) are smarter than Democrats(29%). 3) Liberals(25%) are smarter than Conservatives(36%). Why? Increases in size of groups regresses to the mean. (Again, obvious). Smaller groups of educated people will test higher than larger groups. PROBLEMS WITH ALL SUCH MEASUREMENTS 1) People, but men in particular, do not mature (in IQ) until 22 (at least). 2) We have no test of adult IQ, only children. 3) We tend to use SAT scores as a proxy for IQ. (Good but subset) 4) We tend to use degrees as a proxy for IQ. (Bad proxy) 5) We cannot match SAT and Degrees to Political Preference. 6) We can only survey REPORTED Political Affiliation with REPORTED degree. 7) The vast majority of degrees are (a) ‘nonsense’ degrees (gut courses) and of those the vast majority are (b) by women. 8) The vast majority of advanced degrees are equally nonsense degrees (education, etc). And a disproportionate number of men do not pursue degrees since the trades do not require them. 9) The gender gap is large and ever increasing. Meaning white marrieds, and males against unmarried women of all groups and minorities (who are no longer minorities). THE REAL ANSWER IS NOT INTELLIGENCE BUT GENDER As far as I know the distributions are relatively normal As far as I know gender is a better predictor than intelligence. As far as I know the country is entirely red by men’s vote and almost entirely blue by women’s vote. For this reason also: democrats and liberals dominate mental illness. For this reason also: democrats and liberals report lower happiness. May 19, 2018 9:42pm
  • Intelligence and Political Affiliation: Scale Causes Regression To The Mean

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-average-intelligence-average-IQ-test-scores-any-calculated-metric-of-the-average-American-conservative/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=54709e6f&srid=u4Qv ALL THREE OF THESE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE (And obvious.) 1) Libertarians(7%) are smarter than Liberals(25%). 2) Republicans(26%) are smarter than Democrats(29%). 3) Liberals(25%) are smarter than Conservatives(36%). Why? Increases in size of groups regresses to the mean. (Again, obvious). Smaller groups of educated people will test higher than larger groups. PROBLEMS WITH ALL SUCH MEASUREMENTS 1) People, but men in particular, do not mature (in IQ) until 22 (at least). 2) We have no test of adult IQ, only children. 3) We tend to use SAT scores as a proxy for IQ. (Good but subset) 4) We tend to use degrees as a proxy for IQ. (Bad proxy) 5) We cannot match SAT and Degrees to Political Preference. 6) We can only survey REPORTED Political Affiliation with REPORTED degree. 7) The vast majority of degrees are (a) ‘nonsense’ degrees (gut courses) and of those the vast majority are (b) by women. 8) The vast majority of advanced degrees are equally nonsense degrees (education, etc). And a disproportionate number of men do not pursue degrees since the trades do not require them. 9) The gender gap is large and ever increasing. Meaning white marrieds, and males against unmarried women of all groups and minorities (who are no longer minorities). THE REAL ANSWER IS NOT INTELLIGENCE BUT GENDER As far as I know the distributions are relatively normal As far as I know gender is a better predictor than intelligence. As far as I know the country is entirely red by men’s vote and almost entirely blue by women’s vote. For this reason also: democrats and liberals dominate mental illness. For this reason also: democrats and liberals report lower happiness. May 19, 2018 9:42pm
  • Retweeted Lord Ashcroft (@LordAshcroft): Please retweet if you agree that the Ro

    Retweeted Lord Ashcroft (@LordAshcroft):

    Please retweet if you agree that the Royal Family are a fantastic asset to the U.K. even if like any family there are issues from time to time…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 23:06:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997976763971067910

  • RT @LordAshcroft: Please retweet if you agree that the Royal Family are a fantas

    RT @LordAshcroft: Please retweet if you agree that the Royal Family are a fantastic asset to the U.K. even if like any family there are iss…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 23:06:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997976699198468096

  • Well, are you saying there aren’t people who are dangerous and shouldnt be? What

    Well, are you saying there aren’t people who are dangerous and shouldnt be? What would happen if some psycho from one of your “groups” did something that caused the government to rain down pain on it? What about the idiots wearing Natsoc at Charlottesville? They cost us a year.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 21:32:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997953204531945472

    Reply addressees: @Aristomedes @Imperius__13 @DSA_dienstmann

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997928432498507777


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Aristomedes

    @curtdoolittle @Imperius__13 @DSA_dienstmann Ok, but the question is what process can we do that by that maintains trust ingroup. Doxxing destroys any & all trust because it’s not just banishing someone to the outer darkness, it’s destroying their lives. The suicide of Andrew Dobson for example.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997928432498507777