Any description of any political system must include a population model, an economic model, a commons producing model. If you can’t state all three of those, then you aren’t stating anything that makes any sense at all.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 13:38:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1003632024068984832
Any description of any political system must include a population model, an economic model, a commons producing model. If you can’t state all three of those, then you aren’t stating anything that makes any sense at all.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 09:38:00 UTC
—“I understood Fascism to be the pairing of individualism and collectivism: agreeing we all have to work together, that individualism can exist, and the best way to ensure collective protection, is to safely incentivize individual advancement. …. That means when individual stuff hurts the collective it is not allowed, such as rampant degeneracy, and when collective stuff hurts the individual it is not allowed either such as absurdly high taxes. ….. To put it in brainlet terms.”— Collin Turney
In property in toto, we may not impose costs upon commons directly or indirectly. And the rewards of such cooperation are redistributed as commons.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-04 09:25:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/your_posts/34324888_10156399886852264_1418466417551867904_n_10156399886847264.jpg Scott ThroneAgreed. There are only 2 options for the genuinely noble to impose the correct positions.
Words
Warfare
When words absolutely stop being effective. When reason stops swaying people. When basic moral principles cannot be argued for to the masses. When basic reality becomes “hate”. When the unreasonable (that can never be reasoned with) vastly outnumber the reasonable. When you have huge portions of the pupulace demanding for their own enslavement and believing they are noble for doing so.
Words are over. Talking is done. Nothing more needs said.
I totally agree.Jun 03, 2018 11:59amRichard NikoleyThat was intended to expose you, Curt.Jun 03, 2018 2:44pmCurt DoolittleYou can’t be doxxed if you’re shouting from a mountaintop. You can only be promoted.Jun 03, 2018 3:12pmNeil A. Bucklewnever counter signal what must be done.Jun 03, 2018 3:16pmRichard NikoleyEveryone can easily find my home address. I even give it out to pussy boys now and then right in comments, to shut their pussy boy mouths.Jun 03, 2018 3:49pmHoward Van Der KlauwCan the war be accomplished through law or has that horse bolted?Jun 03, 2018 4:37pmScott ThroneWe are about to find out in Europe. More and more nationalists and right-wingers/anti-immigration parties and candidates are winning.
I hope for a legalistic solution.
I doubt one however.Jun 03, 2018 4:40pmHoward Van Der KlauwScott law is de facto violence. The law pendulum has swung a long way towards permissiveness and away from retribution. It will be interesting to see whether the pendulum swings back (with or without a bit of a push). Me Too for instance can potentially swing law in one of two directions. There are now calls to relax defamation laws so that people can make public unsubstantiated allegations without repercussions. Some people also want a relaxation in standards of evidence when there is only two conflicted testimonies available.Jun 03, 2018 4:45pmScott ThroneI know. Legalistic Warfare by the proxy of the State is still warfare. It’s still violent and still potentially deadly.
I do not however, see a legalistic solution without wide spread civil war. The “forces” are too entrenched.
It won’t be settled in a court or at a Senate.
It will be settled on the street and in the field.
I hope the West is not too far gone to solve this without barbarism and brutality. I just doubt it to be true.Jun 03, 2018 4:57pmRadu M Oleniuc”And when we thought Liberty simply and solely can create civilization, we were bitterly wrong, because civilization creates liberty, and not the other way around” – P.P. Carp, a Romanian Conservative, in 1879.
”Și când noi am gândit că libertatea pur și simplu poate crea civilizațiunea, ne-am înșelat amar, căci civilizațiunea creează libertatea, iar nu libertatea civilizațiunea.” (P.P Carp, 1879)
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=920393444638483&set=a.156953574315811.35814.100000035095938&type=3&theaterJun 03, 2018 7:51pmScott ThroneLiberty is the prize.
Not the strategy.
This is why Libertarianism is insufficient,Jun 03, 2018 7:53pmGenevieve HarrisPhilip i think this is the one i was talking aboutJun 03, 2018 8:40pm
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 09:08:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/34324888_10156399886852264_1418466417551867904_n_10156399886847264.jpg Dmitry NikolovJun 03, 2018 9:25amScott ThroneAgreed. There are only 2 options for the genuinely noble to impose the correct positions.
Words
Warfare
When words absolutely stop being effective. When reason stops swaying people. When basic moral principles cannot be argued for to the masses. When basic reality becomes “hate”. When the unreasonable (that can never be reasoned with) vastly outnumber the reasonable. When you have huge portions of the pupulace demanding for their own enslavement and believing they are noble for doing so.
Words are over. Talking is done. Nothing more needs said.
I totally agree.Jun 03, 2018 11:59amRichard NikoleyThat was intended to expose you, Curt.Jun 03, 2018 2:44pmCurt DoolittleYou can’t be doxxed if you’re shouting from a mountaintop. You can only be promoted.Jun 03, 2018 3:12pmNeil A. Bucklewnever counter signal what must be done.Jun 03, 2018 3:16pmRichard NikoleyEveryone can easily find my home address. I even give it out to pussy boys now and then right in comments, to shut their pussy boy mouths.Jun 03, 2018 3:49pmHoward Van Der KlauwCan the war be accomplished through law or has that horse bolted?Jun 03, 2018 4:37pmScott ThroneWe are about to find out in Europe. More and more nationalists and right-wingers/anti-immigration parties and candidates are winning.
I hope for a legalistic solution.
I doubt one however.Jun 03, 2018 4:40pmHoward Van Der Klauw@[100022007057096:2048:Scott] law is de facto violence. The law pendulum has swung a long way towards permissiveness and away from retribution. It will be interesting to see whether the pendulum swings back (with or without a bit of a push). Me Too for instance can potentially swing law in one of two directions. There are now calls to relax defamation laws so that people can make public unsubstantiated allegations without repercussions. Some people also want a relaxation in standards of evidence when there is only two conflicted testimonies available.Jun 03, 2018 4:45pmScott ThroneI know. Legalistic Warfare by the proxy of the State is still warfare. It’s still violent and still potentially deadly.
I do not however, see a legalistic solution without wide spread civil war. The “forces” are too entrenched.
It won’t be settled in a court or at a Senate.
It will be settled on the street and in the field.
I hope the West is not too far gone to solve this without barbarism and brutality. I just doubt it to be true.Jun 03, 2018 4:57pmRadu M Oleniuc”And when we thought Liberty simply and solely can create civilization, we were bitterly wrong, because civilization creates liberty, and not the other way around” – P.P. Carp, a Romanian Conservative, in 1879.
”Și când noi am gândit că libertatea pur și simplu poate crea civilizațiunea, ne-am înșelat amar, căci civilizațiunea creează libertatea, iar nu libertatea civilizațiunea.” (P.P Carp, 1879)
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=920393444638483&set=a.156953574315811.35814.100000035095938&type=3&theaterJun 03, 2018 7:51pmScott ThroneLiberty is the prize.
Not the strategy.
This is why Libertarianism is insufficient,Jun 03, 2018 7:53pmGenevieve Harris@[100003168052955:2048:Philip] i think this is the one i was talking aboutJun 03, 2018 8:40pm
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 09:08:00 UTC
SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, AND MARKETS FOR SURVIVAL OF A POLITY
Sovereignty in fact – because a group has enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty over the will or ability of any and all competitors.
Liberty by request – because a group does not have enough capacity for violence to produce sovereignty, but can purchase liberty with fees (taxes).
Freedom by permission – because an individual has too little violence to produce sovereignty, and too little violence to request liberty, but can purchase freedom through non-interference and payment of fees (taxes).
Sovereignty is produced as a commons(Polity/Executive).
Liberty is produced as a commons(Business/Managerial).
Freedom is given to produce commons (Trades/Labor).
Serfdom is imposed to produce commons at cost(Labor).
Slavery is imposed to produce commons at high cost(labor).
Whether one demonstrates a condition of Sovereignty(Aristocracy: Polity/Territory), Liberty(Citizen : capital), or freedom (Freeman: body), the production of such must be constructed top down: from commons to degree of property ownership (responsibility) since while it is most productive to have the greatest distribution of property, it is also most productive to limit the distribution of property to those who produce commons.
Since productivity determines the ability for a polity to compete for sovereignty and territory the distribution of property therefore productivity and responsibility is determined by competitive necessity versus the abilities of the population.
Hence the need for growth to defeat the red queen of technology and productivity, against men, and to defeat the red queen of evolution (or devolution, or extinction).
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-03 08:59:00 UTC
4) So Coase expresses at the inter-polity scale, what I express at the intra-polity scale. But the phenomenon is the same: increasing the radius of cooperation will suppress rents(assymetries) through competition, whether internal or external. ….
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-01 16:13:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002584003608809472
Reply addressees: @MartialSociety
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002367912512970752
IN REPLY TO:
@MartialSociety
@curtdoolittle I searched your site & didn’t find anything related. Most discussions of externalities are at least tangentially prefaced with a description of the Coase theorem & its limitations. I’m interested in how you (or another propertarian) would approach the problem.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002367912512970752
1) Hmmm… I think I see polity formation as the process of suppressing local rents, centralizing them to pay for local suppression of rents, and trading a small number of low cost rents that are predictable (taxation) for many high transaction cost rents that are not ….
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-01 16:06:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002582255607451650
Reply addressees: @MartialSociety
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002367912512970752
IN REPLY TO:
@MartialSociety
@curtdoolittle I searched your site & didn’t find anything related. Most discussions of externalities are at least tangentially prefaced with a description of the Coase theorem & its limitations. I’m interested in how you (or another propertarian) would approach the problem.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002367912512970752
Switzerland model with nukes ends the value of scale.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 19:46:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002275249583546368
Reply addressees: @crixuswhite
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002266401598574592
IN REPLY TO:
@crixuswhite
@curtdoolittle Is there any distinction of optimal community sizes? I think often about the removal of any sense of community in white america and wondered if you had an opinion on this.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002266401598574592
I think we have known for millennia that the optimum polity size is that of a small city, but that the cost of financing war either offensive(france) or defensive (germany) or the suppression of local rents (all empires) or opportunism(athens,london,usa) provides malincentives.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-31 19:46:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002275107782447104
Reply addressees: @crixuswhite
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002266401598574592
IN REPLY TO:
@crixuswhite
@curtdoolittle Is there any distinction of optimal community sizes? I think often about the removal of any sense of community in white america and wondered if you had an opinion on this.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1002266401598574592