Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • No, Ethnocentrism under Fascism is the Optimum Strategy.

    —-”The right goes too far when it verges into racism and fascism. At what point does the left go too far?”—-The question makes an assertion (proposition) that is false.

    1. The optimum group strategy is ethnocentrism.
    2. The optimum political strategy is political ethnocentrism.
    3. The optimum economic strategy is intolerance for competition against ethnocentricity,
    4. The optimum legal strategy is rule of law (reciprocity) that enforces non defection against ethnocentrism by a prohibition on internalization of costs and externalization of returns.(Socialization of costs, and privatization of commons).

    As far as I know it is impossible to find evidence, or argue logically, otherwise. Everything else is a justification for parasitism by the commercial complex, religious-academy complex, or the state-tax complex. The left violates every one of those principles in order to dismantle meritocracy and ethnocentrism and to reduce us to socialist poverty – the poverty that ethnocentrism and rule of law evolved to raise us out of. This is the problem with the American Model of a Purely Market Society: without ethnocentrism it is simply suicidal, since without limitations, the commercial, religio-academic, and state-tax-bureaucracy are incentivized to destroy the host population. (And therefore they do). The Returns on Ethnocentrism are multiples of every other possible strategy. Just how it is.

  • “People have lost sight of the origin and purpose of tolerance and secularism, t

    —“People have lost sight of the origin and purpose of tolerance and secularism, to reduce conflict between parties willing to reciprocate a minimum level of basic respect, and have… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=282279529035611&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 12:50:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1031523793532071938

  • THE PROBLEM WITH OPPOSITION TO PROPERTARIANISM Social Democracy -> Classical lib

    THE PROBLEM WITH OPPOSITION TO PROPERTARIANISM

    Social Democracy -> Classical liberalism -> Libertarianism -> Anarcho Capitalism -> Neo-Reaction -> Propertarianism -> Fascism

    The progress of our understanding from optimism and ignorance to pessimism and certainty.

    The problem with Propertarianism for other groups is that it’s law not literature, and as law it is unforgiving (intolerant) of falsehood, pretenses of knowledge or goodness whereas almost every other method of argument makes use of pretenses of truth, knowledge, and good in order to achieve an end that does NOT require truth, knowledge, and reciprocity.

    Why? Because we rally around (politically and socially) discounts that are obtained by use of falsehoods, pretenses, and irreciprocity.

    So the question is always and everywhere, why one would pursue one’s ends (power) by means of discounting using falsehood, pretense, and irreciprocity (fraud), rather than pursue them honestly and restitutionally (restitution) by violence, or honestly and predatorily (predation) by violence – other than (a) one has no chance of achieving other by coercion or violence.

    In other words, why pursue a failure other than to avoid action in pursuit of a success?

    All we ask in propertarianism is to impose reciprocity by violence as a means of restitution.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 10:52:00 UTC

  • THIS IS A MOVEMENT CAN GET BEHIND – THEY POLLUTED PUBLIC SPACES INTO INFANTILE T

    THIS IS A MOVEMENT CAN GET BEHIND – THEY POLLUTED PUBLIC SPACES INTO INFANTILE TOYS FOR TOTS.Updated Aug 20, 2018, 8:53 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 08:53:00 UTC

  • —“Who is driving social Marxism across the globe, and why?”—

      THE CORRECT ANSWER —”Who is driving social Marxism across the globe, and why?”—- If you mean Cultural Marxism, then that was the third generational failure of the Ashkenazi Jews: 1 – Labor Communism (Marx), Generation 1 2 – State Socialism (Trotsky/Lenin/Mao/(Many), Generation 2 3 – Academic Cultural Marxism (The Frankfurt School: Adorno et al.). Generation 3 4 – But upon the failure of all three the French supplied Postmodernism (Derrida, Foucault), and all the university, media, and state actors that had over-invested in the three generational failures of marxism converted to postmodernism. Postmodernism states that there is no truth, no science, no reason, only power, and as such, by use of ideology, propaganda, academy, and media, the ‘Revolution’ against meritocracy (western civilization) can be achieved by the power of words and voting instead of by ideas, science, reason, and achievement. It’s worth noting that The French (always europe’s enemy) had the most authoritarian government in Europe prior to its revolution, the most authoritarian after the revolution, and remains the most authoritarian in Europe today. With Rousseau providing the authoritarian arguments. Arguments that were first copied by the (timid) Germans, then the Rebellious Ashkenazis (Marxists). And horridly implemented by the Soviets, the Maoists, and the Cambodians. And still the cause of South American and Indian poverty. 5 – If we look at the chief propagandists in the west, it’s single women, immigrants, the lower middle class, lower class, underclass, and American jews. As always since American jews are superior competitors in verbal presentation, they provide a disproportionate influence in Entertainment, Entertainment Media, News, Pseudosciences, and Propaganda. (This is easily measured by random sampling of authors of daily propaganda.) Note: Read Paul Fussel’s “Class” for an improvement on marxist class theory. It’s Fussel’s categories I refer to, because they roughly reflect (a) occupational hierarchy, (b) IQ hierarchy, and as such, they match the data. “Defectors” One thing I did not expect was that while the majority of white americans are of german decent (not english), the germans are MUCH LESS likely to serve the country in the military, and the burden is HEAVILY born by the Anglo – Scotts-Irish demographics. Likewise, the Germans and the Puritans of New England are more likely to ‘defect’ into marxism, socialism, postmodernism, and the Scandinavians of the north central even more likely to defect. Note: a friend counsels that the ‘defect’ has been on the continent forever, and goes back to Heraclitus. So the ‘defect’ we see in German Americans, if not all but anglo-scots-iris (southerners). And therefore the question is, what is this defect, and how do we name it operationally? (Really)

  • —“Who is driving social Marxism across the globe, and why?”—

      THE CORRECT ANSWER —”Who is driving social Marxism across the globe, and why?”—- If you mean Cultural Marxism, then that was the third generational failure of the Ashkenazi Jews: 1 – Labor Communism (Marx), Generation 1 2 – State Socialism (Trotsky/Lenin/Mao/(Many), Generation 2 3 – Academic Cultural Marxism (The Frankfurt School: Adorno et al.). Generation 3 4 – But upon the failure of all three the French supplied Postmodernism (Derrida, Foucault), and all the university, media, and state actors that had over-invested in the three generational failures of marxism converted to postmodernism. Postmodernism states that there is no truth, no science, no reason, only power, and as such, by use of ideology, propaganda, academy, and media, the ‘Revolution’ against meritocracy (western civilization) can be achieved by the power of words and voting instead of by ideas, science, reason, and achievement. It’s worth noting that The French (always europe’s enemy) had the most authoritarian government in Europe prior to its revolution, the most authoritarian after the revolution, and remains the most authoritarian in Europe today. With Rousseau providing the authoritarian arguments. Arguments that were first copied by the (timid) Germans, then the Rebellious Ashkenazis (Marxists). And horridly implemented by the Soviets, the Maoists, and the Cambodians. And still the cause of South American and Indian poverty. 5 – If we look at the chief propagandists in the west, it’s single women, immigrants, the lower middle class, lower class, underclass, and American jews. As always since American jews are superior competitors in verbal presentation, they provide a disproportionate influence in Entertainment, Entertainment Media, News, Pseudosciences, and Propaganda. (This is easily measured by random sampling of authors of daily propaganda.) Note: Read Paul Fussel’s “Class” for an improvement on marxist class theory. It’s Fussel’s categories I refer to, because they roughly reflect (a) occupational hierarchy, (b) IQ hierarchy, and as such, they match the data. “Defectors” One thing I did not expect was that while the majority of white americans are of german decent (not english), the germans are MUCH LESS likely to serve the country in the military, and the burden is HEAVILY born by the Anglo – Scotts-Irish demographics. Likewise, the Germans and the Puritans of New England are more likely to ‘defect’ into marxism, socialism, postmodernism, and the Scandinavians of the north central even more likely to defect. Note: a friend counsels that the ‘defect’ has been on the continent forever, and goes back to Heraclitus. So the ‘defect’ we see in German Americans, if not all but anglo-scots-iris (southerners). And therefore the question is, what is this defect, and how do we name it operationally? (Really)

  • We Are Being Men. but We Are Converging

    (Read This) (Revolution Comes) —“It’s astonishing the Right has grown so much – and so much during an economic boom.”— John Reeves We are just being men….. many packs, each with a set of leaders, each with cognitive frames mirroring our experiences, all from a hierarchy of economic and social classes, coalescing on a viable strategy under which we can combine arms. To some degree in these matters we are as slow as we see women organize for small endeavors. While under duress we are much faster (insensitive). When SOMETIMES working on large programs across many tribes we are faced with the same problem that individual women ALWAYS face within groups: risk of dissassociation and resentment that impedes future cooperation. ( Candice Mary, see this paragraph) So we are being men, but we are moving slowly, beuause without an urgency to force our hands, we are acting like cautious women. That said, we are converging on a solution and that solution is revolution, and we all are beginning to understand that it is not only possible, but preferable, and the most preferable of the options. —“Right now we have the luxury to contemplate different ideas, follow different diets etc. One day we won’t have that luxury anymore and we’ll be forced to unite on the basis of what’s truly important, fundamental and realistic (rather than idealistic).”—@Ivar Diederik (Repeating:) If we remove the wealth and order, then the tolerance, like the dam will end, and the natural pressure of the conflict will produce deterministic ends. Never has an empire been so fragile, because never has an empire undermined it’s culture, it’s demographics, and it’s militia (men), at the same time as it has infra structurally, industrially(production), economically(trade), financially(debt and dependence on the dollar), militarily (lost use of the post-communist peace as a means of military transformation) , and politically over extended (bet on a failed strategy of globalism in the face of universal historical balance of powers). All we have to do is break the momentum that preserves the illusion of competence. The greater the fragility the less strength is required. 10K will be enough 100k a risk reduction, 1m a labor reduction, and 10M a time reduction. Numbers buy us comforts but we don’t need them to win. The undomesticated animals will do everything that we don’t need to – chaos.

  • We Are Being Men. but We Are Converging

    (Read This) (Revolution Comes) —“It’s astonishing the Right has grown so much – and so much during an economic boom.”— John Reeves We are just being men….. many packs, each with a set of leaders, each with cognitive frames mirroring our experiences, all from a hierarchy of economic and social classes, coalescing on a viable strategy under which we can combine arms. To some degree in these matters we are as slow as we see women organize for small endeavors. While under duress we are much faster (insensitive). When SOMETIMES working on large programs across many tribes we are faced with the same problem that individual women ALWAYS face within groups: risk of dissassociation and resentment that impedes future cooperation. ( Candice Mary, see this paragraph) So we are being men, but we are moving slowly, beuause without an urgency to force our hands, we are acting like cautious women. That said, we are converging on a solution and that solution is revolution, and we all are beginning to understand that it is not only possible, but preferable, and the most preferable of the options. —“Right now we have the luxury to contemplate different ideas, follow different diets etc. One day we won’t have that luxury anymore and we’ll be forced to unite on the basis of what’s truly important, fundamental and realistic (rather than idealistic).”—@Ivar Diederik (Repeating:) If we remove the wealth and order, then the tolerance, like the dam will end, and the natural pressure of the conflict will produce deterministic ends. Never has an empire been so fragile, because never has an empire undermined it’s culture, it’s demographics, and it’s militia (men), at the same time as it has infra structurally, industrially(production), economically(trade), financially(debt and dependence on the dollar), militarily (lost use of the post-communist peace as a means of military transformation) , and politically over extended (bet on a failed strategy of globalism in the face of universal historical balance of powers). All we have to do is break the momentum that preserves the illusion of competence. The greater the fragility the less strength is required. 10K will be enough 100k a risk reduction, 1m a labor reduction, and 10M a time reduction. Numbers buy us comforts but we don’t need them to win. The undomesticated animals will do everything that we don’t need to – chaos.

  • Postmodernism is the disease, and the hard right is the cure

    Postmodernism is the disease, and the hard right is the cure.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-18 17:19:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1030866832545198080

  • Postmodernism is the disease, and the hard right is the cure

    Postmodernism is the disease, and the hard right is the cure.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-18 13:19:00 UTC