Theme: Governance

  • Eric Danelaw We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought abo

    Eric Danelaw

    We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=287200928543471&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 15:15:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033734806616662016

  • WHAT IF AMERICA BECOMES INSULAR AGAIN? —-“What do Europeans, Canadians, Austra

    WHAT IF AMERICA BECOMES INSULAR AGAIN?

    —-“What do Europeans, Canadians, Australians and other western societies think of what is happening politically in America right now? Is there fear for the future should the USA become insular once again?”— Quora User

    We Americans are going to do everything we can to end imperial postwar America, end the remains of the British empire, and return to the balance of power system, where we are not responsible for financing and policing the ‘uncivilized world’.

    We are pretty tired of europeans, austrialians and canadians in particular from signaling moral superiority when the are just free riders on the military financial cultural and political costs born by american peoples.

    So if you mean by ‘insular’ we are no longer going to tolerate your virtue signaling, paying for your military defense, the world financial system, the world political system, and being the dumping ground for immigrants, yeah, insular means ‘no more free rides for people who disrespect you for having given them the ride’.

    Canada, like Sweden is on the way to making itself the middle east.

    Parts of america are on the way to making themselves brazil.

    England is on it’s way to making itself north africa,

    And france already is north africa.

    You don’t get diversity with diversity. You get underclass monopoly. All states that try turn in to poor countries with corrupt governments and some sort of stated or unstated caste system

    You can diversity from NATION STATES where every people pays the cost of carrying their own development, and particularly of their underclasses.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 13:07:00 UTC

  • WE GOT WHAT WE LET HOSTILE PEOPLES ASK FOR We are at war. A very nearly hot civi

    WE GOT WHAT WE LET HOSTILE PEOPLES ASK FOR

    We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order.

    When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts btween despots.

    Becuase only a despot can rule over competing peoples.

    And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at lesat ten culturally separate regions.

    You get what you ask for.

    We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 11:15:00 UTC

  • RT @Outsideness: “… This makes the relative radio silence from Muslim countrie

    RT @Outsideness: “… This makes the relative radio silence from Muslim countries all the more stunning.” https://supchina.com/2018/08/22/xinjiang-explainer-chinas-reeducation-camps-for-a-million-muslims/
    — It’s t…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 01:31:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033527436477128704

  • (….brought into consistency with the gated institutional narrative, assisting

    (….brought into consistency with the gated institutional narrative, assisting the left in winning elections. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 01:31:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033527287717801984

    Reply addressees: @Outsideness

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033166534783324160


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Outsideness

    … Crudely obvious but true:
    The primary function of journalism is to repackage facts until they’ve been brought into consistency with the Left winning elections. …

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033166534783324160

  • Understanding is Overrated

    A Moral License. (you have one) A Set of Demands (you’ll get one) A Means of transition (you’ll get one) A Means of altering the status quo (you have it – fragility) An Opportunity: it will come this year I think.

  • Understanding is Overrated

    A Moral License. (you have one) A Set of Demands (you’ll get one) A Means of transition (you’ll get one) A Means of altering the status quo (you have it – fragility) An Opportunity: it will come this year I think.

  • “Q: I hate to get off the topic but what exactly is an economically conservative

    —“Q:  I hate to get off the topic but what exactly is an economically conservative social liberal Constitutionalist Republican?”— someone else, about a friend. (I view it as a moral crime that this isn’t part of the curriculum)

    Republican: (vs democratic, vs authoritarian) Representative government should produce legislation and regulation. (Iron law of oligarchy says they will form no matter what so why not construct one that rotates by election.) Social Liberal: The state should use income from progressive taxation to produce commons of benefit to the people, because they produce multipliers (returns) on investments that limit the practical differential between peoples. (hard to argue with this because no one on earth seems to think otherwise)  … AND the state shall not inhibit the self expression of individuals by the enforcement of norms of the traditional family. ( I view this as a mistake.) Economically conservative: the state should operate within a budge and not exacerbate the business cycle, nor export risk between generations. (This will happen shortly as worldwide the keyenesian experiment is coming to an end) Constitutionalist: The declaration, constitution, and bill of rights constitute a statement of natural law (reciprocity) under rule of law (limits all of us to reciprocity, particularly members of the state), under universal standing (applies equally to all of us, and to the state, and we have the right of juridical defense from each other regardless of civil, state, or military.) (This remains a problem because the state has dis-intermediated the people from the commons via the courts.)
  • “Q: I hate to get off the topic but what exactly is an economically conservative

    —“Q:  I hate to get off the topic but what exactly is an economically conservative social liberal Constitutionalist Republican?”— someone else, about a friend. (I view it as a moral crime that this isn’t part of the curriculum)

    Republican: (vs democratic, vs authoritarian) Representative government should produce legislation and regulation. (Iron law of oligarchy says they will form no matter what so why not construct one that rotates by election.) Social Liberal: The state should use income from progressive taxation to produce commons of benefit to the people, because they produce multipliers (returns) on investments that limit the practical differential between peoples. (hard to argue with this because no one on earth seems to think otherwise)  … AND the state shall not inhibit the self expression of individuals by the enforcement of norms of the traditional family. ( I view this as a mistake.) Economically conservative: the state should operate within a budge and not exacerbate the business cycle, nor export risk between generations. (This will happen shortly as worldwide the keyenesian experiment is coming to an end) Constitutionalist: The declaration, constitution, and bill of rights constitute a statement of natural law (reciprocity) under rule of law (limits all of us to reciprocity, particularly members of the state), under universal standing (applies equally to all of us, and to the state, and we have the right of juridical defense from each other regardless of civil, state, or military.) (This remains a problem because the state has dis-intermediated the people from the commons via the courts.)
  • Fascism Defined

    1. Fascism (colloquially) refers to intolerant totalitarian nationalism, or in general, intolerance and mandatory CONFORMITY. 2. Fascism (scientifically) as far as I know, is a label for (a) totalitarian (conformist), (b) nationalism (c) bordering on economic autarky, (c) with heavy use of proceeds from major industries for socialist (meaning ‘commons’) purposes. So in the colloquial sense it is correct.

    I consider myself a Market Fascist, in the sense that natural law can be implemented with zero tolerance, producing the optimum market order. I see private public partnerships as competitively necessary. I see the disintermediation of the people from the courts by the bureaucracy and government the principle problem.