As I said elsewhere, the market for leadership will supply leaders. We must lead one another to sufficient numbers that leadership in that market can emerge.
Theme: Governance
-
As I said elsewhere, the market for leadership will supply leaders. We must lead
-
As I said elsewhere, the market for leadership will supply leaders. We must lead
As I said elsewhere, the market for leadership will supply leaders. We must lead one another to sufficient numbers that leadership in that market can emerge.
-
Producing Submission to The Pack
The fundamental problem is producing submission to the pack (piety) when the leadership of the pack is just as much of a bunch of bitchy whiny egoistic a–holes as you are. Hence idealistic third party proxies, OR monarchies. My preference is monarchies backed by judges and warriors. They’re not false. And they tend to subsidize the arts and letters.
-
Producing Submission to The Pack
The fundamental problem is producing submission to the pack (piety) when the leadership of the pack is just as much of a bunch of bitchy whiny egoistic a–holes as you are. Hence idealistic third party proxies, OR monarchies. My preference is monarchies backed by judges and warriors. They’re not false. And they tend to subsidize the arts and letters.
-
No Professional Parasites
It’s not that complicated. We have known this fact for two thousand years: (a) no professional priests, (b) no professional politicians (c) no monopoly bureaucracy, and therefore no insulation from the market. Add (d) full accountability for the truthfulness of public speech by involuntary warranty of consistency, correspondence, existential possibility, rationality, reciprocity, and full accounting.
-
No Professional Parasites
It’s not that complicated. We have known this fact for two thousand years: (a) no professional priests, (b) no professional politicians (c) no monopoly bureaucracy, and therefore no insulation from the market. Add (d) full accountability for the truthfulness of public speech by involuntary warranty of consistency, correspondence, existential possibility, rationality, reciprocity, and full accounting.
-
—“Q: Does the government really keep us 80 years behind in terms of technology?”—
In the sense that they misallocate research funds to pseudosciencies, particularly diet, ‘health’, anthropology, sociology and psychology, then yes. In the sense that they prohibit research into eugenics such as stem cell research and human genome improvement, then yes. In the sense that they deny races, the harm of diversity, and the near universal importance of Intelligence and industriousness, then yes. In the sense that they leave technological investment to the private sector instead of partnering on high capital investment technologies, then yes. In the sense that they underfund NASA, and the high cost of non-mathematical research into the physical universe, then yes. in the sense that they underfund the PRODUCTION of military hardware that works and practice incremental improvement including the supply chain, rather than fund experimental military hardware that is of very limited value, then yes.
-
—“Q: Does the government really keep us 80 years behind in terms of technology?”—
In the sense that they misallocate research funds to pseudosciencies, particularly diet, ‘health’, anthropology, sociology and psychology, then yes. In the sense that they prohibit research into eugenics such as stem cell research and human genome improvement, then yes. In the sense that they deny races, the harm of diversity, and the near universal importance of Intelligence and industriousness, then yes. In the sense that they leave technological investment to the private sector instead of partnering on high capital investment technologies, then yes. In the sense that they underfund NASA, and the high cost of non-mathematical research into the physical universe, then yes. in the sense that they underfund the PRODUCTION of military hardware that works and practice incremental improvement including the supply chain, rather than fund experimental military hardware that is of very limited value, then yes.
-
People will rally around a plan that includes sufficient incentives, and suffici
People will rally around a plan that includes sufficient incentives, and sufficient detail, that they can themselves operate without relying upon desperation and luck.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 19:19:00 UTC
-
As I said elsewhere, the market for leadership will supply leaders. We must lead
As I said elsewhere, the market for leadership will supply leaders. We must lead one another to sufficient numbers that leadership in that market can emerge.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 19:17:00 UTC