Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • WAR OVER SCRIPTS by John Mark The culture war is the battle over whose scripts c

    WAR OVER SCRIPTS

    by John Mark

    The culture war is the battle over whose scripts control the most NPCs.

    NPCs lean mostly left because the lies feel better. The Right has a built-in disadvantage in the culture war. On top of that, the Right-wing NPCs (“No more illegals but yay legal nonwhite immigrants bcuz I don’t want to be wacist!”) actively support invasion of millions of enemy NPCs every year.

    Thus we cannot win back America by winning the culture war. Give us 20 years with no immigration, maybe. But because of immigration we don’t have the time.

    So we separate.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 17:30:00 UTC

  • NSDAP was the most successful attempt to date to produce the french ambition of

    NSDAP was the most successful attempt to date to produce the french ambition of national socialism. The reason it worked in germany and will work in china is “chip on their shoulder” and homogeneity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 16:50:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052965252944551937

  • STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM There is no difference between NSDAP germa

    STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM

    There is no difference between NSDAP germany and CENTRAL PARTY china other than the scale of the bureaucracy necessary to administer a more rapid modernization (in china) and a rapid resistance to communism (in germany).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 16:50:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052965032206761992

  • NSDAP was the most successful attempt to date to produce the french ambition of

    NSDAP was the most successful attempt to date to produce the french ambition of national socialism. The reason it worked in germany and will work in china is “chip on their shoulder” and homogeneity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 12:50:00 UTC

  • STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM There is no difference between NSDAP germa

    STATE CAPITALISM = NATIONAL SOCIALISM

    There is no difference between NSDAP germany and CENTRAL PARTY china other than the scale of the bureaucracy necessary to administer a more rapid modernization (in china) and a rapid resistance to communism (in germany).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 12:49:00 UTC

  • THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION Left and Right is simply the problem of reproduc

    THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION

    Left and Right is simply the problem of reproductively desirable for the purpose of intergenrational families, businesses and polities, versus the desire for satisfaction of sexual impulses, independent of family, industry, and polity. IN other words: “The competition between european paternal, familial, commercial, and political families, and semitic maternal, individual, subsistence, anarchy.

    Those with agency (orderly masculine) vs those lacking it (anarchic feminine).

    We cannot fix this problem because under prosperity people pursue their interests. It’s in the intersets of those with lower sexual, social, economic, political, military market value – they are less domesticated OR less desirable: “politics is the entertainment business for ugly people, and media is the occupation for those who cannot produce, and the academy the occupation for those who cannot materially compete.”

    THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION

    “Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 09:54:00 UTC

  • To Elders of The Black Sun 3 : Possible Orders

    October 17th, 2018 9:46 AM TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 : POSSIBLE ORDERS [O]K, so you are producing sufficient depth of thought so that if you work at it enough you can produce a canon. Organizational charts (prescriptions) are open to implementation the way simple sentimental resonance (Evola) is not. However, all civilizations are organized by law (or more precisely, rules). Islam is ‘easy’ because the rules are so complete, and an imbecile can memorize the myth, and principles through repetition. Christianity was imposed by coercion (literacy), as a market competition between church (nobility) and military (aristocracy). Judaism is used to preserve separatism. Hindu ‘law’ is limited but the mythos vast. Buddhism always and everywhere coexists with a martial or bureaucratic state. Hinduism and Shintoism do not need so much ‘authority’ because of genetic and cultural homogeneity. Christianity was germanicized for the same reason. Orthodoxy and islam exist across less developed (market) peoples (orthodoxy), and islam across both less developed and tribal peoples (constant hostility). We do not succeed with ideal religions. We succeed with religions that solve a problem. What religion will solve the problem of modernity AND ethnocentrism, since ethnocentrism is the optimum organizing method as long as it’s not regressive. Jews survived by parasitism on existing civilizations through profit from moral hazard, accumulating capital, and then using it for more moral hazard, until they were cast out. During that entire time they contributed nothing to humanity (competitiveness) until converted to aristotelianism. In general, either (a) produce a fiction that people want to run to for economic or political reasons (marxism, postmodernism, feminism); (b) produce an economic order that people want to run to for economic reasons; (c) Produce a Myth of Conquest by which a small group of men can take advantage of a weakness in a current order; (d) produce an improvement in a mythos over a homogenous polity that provides greater explanatory power, and greater utility, and greater methods of cooperation in new (current) conditions. There are only three possible incentives in the production of order: Law/Violence, Commerce/Wealth, Cult/Cooperation

  • To Elders of The Black Sun 3 : Possible Orders

    October 17th, 2018 9:46 AM TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 : POSSIBLE ORDERS [O]K, so you are producing sufficient depth of thought so that if you work at it enough you can produce a canon. Organizational charts (prescriptions) are open to implementation the way simple sentimental resonance (Evola) is not. However, all civilizations are organized by law (or more precisely, rules). Islam is ‘easy’ because the rules are so complete, and an imbecile can memorize the myth, and principles through repetition. Christianity was imposed by coercion (literacy), as a market competition between church (nobility) and military (aristocracy). Judaism is used to preserve separatism. Hindu ‘law’ is limited but the mythos vast. Buddhism always and everywhere coexists with a martial or bureaucratic state. Hinduism and Shintoism do not need so much ‘authority’ because of genetic and cultural homogeneity. Christianity was germanicized for the same reason. Orthodoxy and islam exist across less developed (market) peoples (orthodoxy), and islam across both less developed and tribal peoples (constant hostility). We do not succeed with ideal religions. We succeed with religions that solve a problem. What religion will solve the problem of modernity AND ethnocentrism, since ethnocentrism is the optimum organizing method as long as it’s not regressive. Jews survived by parasitism on existing civilizations through profit from moral hazard, accumulating capital, and then using it for more moral hazard, until they were cast out. During that entire time they contributed nothing to humanity (competitiveness) until converted to aristotelianism. In general, either (a) produce a fiction that people want to run to for economic or political reasons (marxism, postmodernism, feminism); (b) produce an economic order that people want to run to for economic reasons; (c) Produce a Myth of Conquest by which a small group of men can take advantage of a weakness in a current order; (d) produce an improvement in a mythos over a homogenous polity that provides greater explanatory power, and greater utility, and greater methods of cooperation in new (current) conditions. There are only three possible incentives in the production of order: Law/Violence, Commerce/Wealth, Cult/Cooperation

  • The Problem of Political Stability

    October 16th, 2018 12:33 PM THE PROBLEM OF POLITICAL STABILITY by Michael Churchill

    The left cannot function once its means are revealed. Its leaders understand that, hence the cultivation of Antifa as shock troops. Democracy may be in the process of phasing out as an optimal political solution, because it creates a monopoly, and one side cannot accept the other side’s victory if it’s a given that it is not one country but two enemy camps. Even Bolsonaro is a manifestation of that. So the interesting question is what will the political map look like in 20 years around the globe. A mix of right and left wing dictatorships? The problem with dictatorship is that it is not really stable if it’s imposed on half the population against their will. Thus it would seem to me something else would be more likely to come about.

    ( CD: Ergo, Nationalism(Fascism) by Political Order. )

  • The optimum government is flexible

    October 16th, 2018 11:30 AM

    —“That The optimum government is flexible (Roman) with Authoritarianism for War, Markets for growth, and Redistribution for Windfalls. Can’t be said enough.”— William L. Benge