The Middle is only population segment with natural incentives to succeed honestly. The top likes to steal (corruption) cuz they can (they have the power to do so unless the middle punishes them for it). The bottom wants/tries to steal because they are too low-IQ to succeed much honestly. The middle is capable enough to succeed honestly but not powerful enough to have the opportunity to gain much by stealing/corruption.
Thus the middle must rule, and restrain the bottom and top.
Actually the law (natural law of reciprocity, Curt’s work and new constitution) must rule, but it will be primarily enforced by the middle whose incentives line up most with natural law.
Of course I’ll disagree with him, and so will anyone who looks a the locations of the troops, their numbers the BIAS of those troops, the numbers of the police, and first responders, the size of the territory, the number of worldwide assets that have to be protected from hostile external factors, the fragility of the system, and the success WORLDWIDE OF EVERY 5GW revolutionary force. Look at Syria, the Arab Spring, Yemen, the problem Iran has, turkey had, the fragility of the american grids, the dependence of urban underclasses on availability of cash, food, and digital transfers. The zero savings of the population…. I mean. the entire american experiment is dependent upon maintaining economic velocity that we currently refer to as just-in-time production and distribution due to plentiful information and extremely low cost transportation. There is very little electricity, heat, food, water, and such in the supply chain. Especially if actors function in winter, entire cities can be depopulated in weeks. I mean. It’s not like it takes millions in the streets. Man-on-man warfare went out with napoleon. Industrial warfare went out with the 1990’s. Today it’s just ‘break some infrastructure’ and let population density and the fragility of the supply chain do the work of turning people into rabid animals the male underclass of which will prey on the rest. As an example, one building can consume the fire departments of multiple cities. What if in the same city someone started 100 of those fires? What if that were done while breaking hydrant heads and losing the water pressure to fight the fire? Everyone thinks of millions in the streets but what I learned in ukraine is that 100 people can do all the fighting and just fall back into those people in the streets, in homes, in workplaces, and the state cannot pursue them. I mean, I am not the only person who has studied enough on this subject to make these statements. The military can ONLY concentrate force. There are only 2m. Of those 2m who will sympathize with the state if we offer a solution that restores military influence in the state, and improves the conditions of the soldiers? So the question is, not whether you have some ‘spastic’ uprising. The question is whether you position demands THAT PEOPLE WANT ANYWAY and drive those demands such that the state resists, but he military and police AGREE WITH THEM.
I mean, if they think they can get an impeachment result (they can’t) then that’s one thing. But a government run by Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein… Well, you know it’s going to end up as Jews and the underclasses of color and single women against the working, middle, entrepreneurial, and married whites. In other words, the end result will be californian and world normal orders of small wealthy upper classes and large poor underclasses. Whereas the USA was founded and intentionally designed as a third way: the working, middle, and entrepreneurial classes, with marginalized lower and upper classes. Not that anyone will care that the reason for our success was that middle class order.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45678115_10156766138427264_5312080229605310464_o_10156766138417264.jpg THE REVOLUTIONARY RECORD
Hmmmm. Mao racked up 70m, Stalin 20m, Hitler 12m, and Pol Pot at least 2m, Napoleon, Caesar, and Alexander at least 1m, each. I mean, the chinese and the mongols are the world masters of death tolls.
With the muslim conquest and destruction of every civlization of the ancient world EXCEPT the chinese and to a lesser extent, the Indian. Thy racked up a Billion (yeah, billion), or so close to it, that it’s a rounding error.
And to make a fair comparison between teh muslim conquest and the jewish conquest under Marxism, the Marxists cumulatively got to 100m. So the semites, between the Jews (100M), and the Muslims (1B) seem to be the most successful at decimation of peoples.
Again, we learn the lesson of from the chinese: ‘wall off the barbarians, and keep them out’. ergo, wall the Straits of Gibraltar, the Bosphorus, the Caucus Mountains, and the Ural Mountains, and contain the ‘stans, mongolians and chinese to their positions.
Now, Romans did a sizable job, but the consequence of the dispersal catastrophic. (See image below). The only restitution being restoring the homeland (done) and repatriating the descendents (yet to be done).
By comparisons, Anglos are lightweights. With the War of the Roses at 40k, 25k in the Revolutionary War. 500K in the Civil War.
So, you know 30m (10%) is sort of the minimum with 100m a more proportional goal.
LIST OF WARS BY DEATH TOLL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_tollEly HarmanTime to set a new world record…Nov 9, 2018, 10:10 AMJeremiah GreasingGuinness here we comeNov 9, 2018, 10:26 AMCharles LamptonSkull pyramids.Nov 9, 2018, 12:12 PMCorbus AureliusBuild the wall out of bones.Nov 9, 2018, 7:27 PMBryan Nova BreyRoman Empire vs Jews was a 3 part Epic!?!Nov 9, 2018, 9:13 PMTHE REVOLUTIONARY RECORD
Hmmmm. Mao racked up 70m, Stalin 20m, Hitler 12m, and Pol Pot at least 2m, Napoleon, Caesar, and Alexander at least 1m, each. I mean, the chinese and the mongols are the world masters of death tolls.
With the muslim conquest and destruction of every civlization of the ancient world EXCEPT the chinese and to a lesser extent, the Indian. Thy racked up a Billion (yeah, billion), or so close to it, that it’s a rounding error.
And to make a fair comparison between teh muslim conquest and the jewish conquest under Marxism, the Marxists cumulatively got to 100m. So the semites, between the Jews (100M), and the Muslims (1B) seem to be the most successful at decimation of peoples.
Again, we learn the lesson of from the chinese: ‘wall off the barbarians, and keep them out’. ergo, wall the Straits of Gibraltar, the Bosphorus, the Caucus Mountains, and the Ural Mountains, and contain the ‘stans, mongolians and chinese to their positions.
Now, Romans did a sizable job, but the consequence of the dispersal catastrophic. (See image below). The only restitution being restoring the homeland (done) and repatriating the descendents (yet to be done).
By comparisons, Anglos are lightweights. With the War of the Roses at 40k, 25k in the Revolutionary War. 500K in the Civil War.
So, you know 30m (10%) is sort of the minimum with 100m a more proportional goal.
She will resign. She will have to. (a) cancer out of remission, (b) fall, (c) holding out for better election results, but (d) no blue wave, and (e) she can’t physically make it another two to six years, so it’s not in here interests to stay.
@HuffPost People, we need to pray HARD right now that she heals and is well enough to continue on the Supreme Court. We cannot afford to lose any liberals!
Sending healing energy & praying to the Goddess that Ruth Bader Ginsburg recovers her health fully!
@Acosta pass revoked after doing what’s right
@PressSec posts doctored video
Terrorist/mass shooter kills 12 in Thousand Oaks
Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized after breaking 3 ribs
Thousands of acres are burning in Northern California
#ProtectMueller’s investigation
The lower your demographic distribution the higher demand for authority to substitute for trust and rule of law. The higher your trust the lower the demand for authority as a substitute for trust and rule of law. The only means of producing trust and rule of law is sufficiently large middle class that generates demand for rule of law in order to construct the voluntary organization of production, distribution, and trade, we call capitalism – or what the ordinary person calls ‘an economy’.
So the dispute between capitalism and socialism was always a (((Lie))), it has always been between consistent rule of law independent of man, and arbitrary rule by man.
The lower your demographic distribution the higher demand for authority to substitute for trust and rule of law. The higher your trust the lower the demand for authority as a substitute for trust and rule of law. The only means of producing trust and rule of law is sufficiently large middle class that generates demand for rule of law in order to construct the voluntary organization of production, distribution, and trade, we call capitalism – or what the ordinary person calls ‘an economy’.
So the dispute between capitalism and socialism was always a (((Lie))), it has always been between consistent rule of law independent of man, and arbitrary rule by man.
