Either you are willing to fight or you are not.
You can fight the intellectual war (positiva)
You can fight the poisoning the well war (ridicule) (negativa)
You can fight the political war (positiva)
You can fight the physical war (positiva)
You can fight the reproductive war (positiva)
We all fight at the limits of our ability.
What matters is that we fight.
What matters most, is that we fight physically when the opportunity arises.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-07 08:40:00 UTC
We have the answer. But no answer is popular enough to implement by existing means. We can’t currently even reform criminal law, education, finance, family and marriage law. The only possible means of achieving our ends, is the organized application of violence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-05 14:24:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081557172650196993
Reply addressees: @TheOldOrder1 @ArktosMedia @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081462059622117376
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081462059622117376
MR PRESIDENT: Please Staff TSA with military. It’s what we want anyway. PLEASE do it. PLEASE keep the govt closed as long as possible.
@POTUS @realDonaldTrump
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 23:52:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081337584830332930
Name calling with profanities is not speaking truth to power. It’s INFANTILISM.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 21:24:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081300471258775552
Reply addressees: @RashidaTlaib
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081190513691246592
IN REPLY TO:
@RashidaTlaib
I will always speak truth to power. #unapologeticallyMe
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081190513691246592
@RashidaTlaib You’re a great example of unfitness to serve in government. We can measure civilizational decline every time you open your mouth.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 21:24:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081300254237097984
MORE ON THE VULNERABILITY OF WESTERN NATIONS
(Rule of Threes…three weeks without power, three months without order…)
—“an Iranian military journal has floated around the idea of launching an EMP attack as the key to defeating the U.S. In an article titled “Electronics to Determine Fate of Future Wars,” the journal explains how an EMP attack on America’s electronic infrastructure would bring the country to its knees.
“Once you confuse the enemy communication network, you can also disrupt the work of the enemy command- and decision-making center,” the article states. “Even worse today when you disable a country’s military high command through disruption of communications, you will, in effect, disrupt all the affairs of that country. If the world’s industrial countries fail to devise effective ways to defend themselves against dangerous electronic assaults, then they will disintegrate within a few years. American soldiers would not be able to find food to eat nor would they be able to fire a single shot.”
Reporting to Congress, the EMP Commission concluded that little in the private sector is hardened to withstand an EMP attack, and even the U.S. military itself has only limited protection. In 2005, Former CIA chief James Woolsey affirmed these facts and urged the country to take steps necessary to protect against the potentially devastating consequences. In testimony before the House International Terrorism and Non-Proliferation Subcommittee, Woolsey referred to the nuclear EMP threat as “a SCUD in a bucket” whereby:
“…a simple ballistic missile from a stockpile somewhere in the world outfitted on something like a tramp steamer and fired from some distance offshore into an American city or to a high altitude, thereby creating an electromagnetic pulse effect, which could well be one of the most damaging ways of using a nuclear weapon.”
“…We do not have the luxury of assuming that Iran, if it develops fissionable materials, for example, would not share it under some circumstances with al-Qaida operatives. We don’t have the luxury of believing that just because North Korea is a communist state, it would not work under some circumstances to sell its fissionable material to Hezbollah or al-Qaida.”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 14:29:00 UTC
PUTTING YOUR TRUST IN ONE GOVERNMENT ORDER OR ANOTHER?
You have to choose whether to trust the self interest of the judicial ‘priesthood’, the self interest of the monarchy, the self interest of the ruling oligarchy, or the self control of the democratic polity, or the self interests of public intellectuals.
My argument is that you can’t trust any of them, and that the judicial priesthood benefits from ‘maintaining the rules of the game’, but if and only if the military will back them up.
Why? The judiciary is a purely via-negativa discipline: it advocates nothing, and only resolves conflicts. It is already privileged. It is already high status. It is operationally selective (failure is quickly obvious and resolved), and failure of members is against the interest of the whole, who police it well through hierarchical review.
The central issue in limiting the judiciary and preserving its freedom from via-positiva action, is nothing more than insufficiently enumerated terms of decidability.
And that’s what i’ve done. Provided that completeness.
-Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 09:17:00 UTC
( I grow in popularity every day. It’s because the USA is closer to demographic collapse. As europe reaches the same point the same will happen there. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-03 16:52:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080869472129482752
Reply addressees: @Victori00820164 @lion__noir @Adrianmoore528 @SomeMoreNews
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080743430534291461
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080743430534291461
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49277751_10156893074727264_553172499026673664_o_10156893074717264.jpg US WARNS US CITIZENS TO EXERCISE CAUTION IN CHINA”
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/china-travel-advisory.htmlErik LukovskyWhy the hell would they risk this? China’s chutzpah is growing day by dayJan 3, 2019, 4:22 PMTom RamboRicky MolnarJan 3, 2019, 4:30 PMRicky MolnarDon’t most countries arrest people who commit crimes within their borders?Jan 3, 2019, 4:47 PMCurt DoolittleRicky Molnar that’s not what it says.Jan 3, 2019, 4:54 PMJames Santagata100% predicted this back in late 1990’s from reports coming back from friends, neighbors, etc doing biz there – mostly in infra, telcomm and high tech.. It’s the logical conclusion of one way trade, having to sign over IP or form joint ventures to get a piece of the lie – the lie, not pie By mid 2000s I met countless apac and global hq execs who had realized what I said. Japan has high margins (though falling pop so it precludes some products), they don’t steal your ip, and you always get paid without the smog. Search “why I’m leaving china” on YouTube and watch this one. If you knew this it’s just final confirmation. If it’s new, then now you see (((who))) and why they carried chinas water for 30 years. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HrzJcnK_c-4Jan 3, 2019, 4:55 PMThomas AndreassonRicky Molnar you have obviously not visited Sweden. LolJan 3, 2019, 4:58 PMJames SantagataBeyond that, you have to love china – once Chinese by genes always Chinese. Nothing changes it. It’s not a (((proposition))) like (((America))) and impossible to become a naturalized Chinese citizen. Look it up! Zero reciprocity. And no, china laughs at things like Holohoax mind control.Jan 3, 2019, 5:00 PMRicky MolnarCurt Doolittle Fill me in then. What am I not getting?Jan 3, 2019, 5:00 PMRicky MolnarReally good video, I actually watched it yesterday. Basically, as China develops further, they want to make a point about relying less and less on foreigners each day. A lot of Chinese society revolves around saving face and that’s what they’re trying to do.Jan 3, 2019, 5:02 PMRicky Molnar>tfw no ethnostateJan 3, 2019, 5:02 PMCurt Doolittlethey are targeting people who have dual citizenship in order to capture american IP, and prevent talent and capital flight, because they know their ‘correction’ is coming.Jan 3, 2019, 5:08 PMGordon ThompsonWE are seeing the beginning of a worldwide division of spheres of economic interests to preserve THE dominance of USA in West…we arehaving travel restricted and commercial business will be curtailed with Asia.Jan 3, 2019, 5:19 PMRicky MolnarThat’s impossible. It says in the image that they don’t acknowledge dual citizenship. “Dual citizenship” has no meaning in Chinese law.Jan 3, 2019, 5:20 PMRicky MolnarIt seems to me that you’re adding information to this post that was not previously present. Nothing about the image says anything about IP or protecting talent. So to say “that’s not what it says” does me no good because you still aren’t clarifying what it says. You’re just giving unrelated analysis of China.Jan 3, 2019, 5:22 PMAna Stowe GeorgievCompare Western and Eastern Europe right now. Western Europe has a higher travel advisory rate than almost all Eastern European countriesJan 3, 2019, 6:13 PMJon Jonathan”to aid Chinese authorities in resolving civil disputes in favor of Chinese parties”Jan 3, 2019, 6:29 PMRicky MolnarRight, because if you commit a crime against a Chinese national and flee the country then there’s no recourse for that Chinese person. Seems rational to me.Jan 3, 2019, 6:30 PMJon JonathanThough tbh parts of Eastern Europe probably should have a higher travel advisory, “if you are of African descent do not attempt to harass women under threat of your own safety” but Western travel advisories won’t get broken down by race even to issue notices to protect minorities 🤣Jan 3, 2019, 6:32 PMScott FreemanThere’s nothing new in this announcement.Jan 3, 2019, 8:31 PMErik LukovskyWhat if you’re born in China and one parent is Chinese?
Also don’t the Chinese love Jews? I think they admire their business prowess, I’ve only heard positive from Jews who are thereJan 3, 2019, 9:18 PMRicky MolnarIf you were born in China and one parent is Chinese, then you would be Chinese. Obviously the complication is that if the other parent is American, that would make you American too, right? Well, under Chinese law you have to pick one or the other. If you choose to take up American citizenship, you must give up your Chinese citizenship.
Chinese don’t think about Jews much. Their impressions of Jews are “wow those people are very clever” and “Hitler tried to kill them” but ultimately they don’t give a shit because it’s not their history and not their problem. Six million dead Jews means nothing compared to all the dead Chinese from WWII and they definitely don’t have the white guilt that has caused Westerners to chastise themselves for 80 years. Fortunately for the Chinese, Jews are unable to blend into Chinese society and cannot operate at full capacity as a parasitic race.Jan 3, 2019, 9:22 PMErik LukovskyInteresting, so they make you choose
Jews have minimal history in Asia and China, they were always small in population there and never wanted to live there en masse like they wanted to in the West, but yeah that’s what I’m saying, the Chinese are more or less indifferent to them
Now, what if you tried to apply for dual citizenship later after choosing Chinese, they would just decline you?Jan 3, 2019, 9:43 PMRicky MolnarIf the Chinese government found out that you had claimed citizenship in another country after already being a Chinese citizen, they would revoke your Chinese citizenship.Jan 3, 2019, 9:45 PMKari Anne DorstadWell I know for fact I will never visit China !!i had hard time seeing what this warning said because it’s so smallJan 3, 2019, 9:45 PMKari Anne DorstadI no longer own a desk top computer! I’m so glad it’s gone ! I’m down to Just an iPhone !Jan 3, 2019, 9:46 PMMary RomanoRicky Molnar Fortunately for the Chinese, their culture isn’t run by an ethnic minority that despises them and has brainwashed them into hating their own history and whitewashed the history of ((())).Jan 4, 2019, 5:47 AMKarl KühlschrankOne of the Americans picked up by the Chicoms, the male, is a member of an organization full of globalists, and Soros. Makes me realize the Chinese are not our friends generally, yet still based. They act like a nation that want to remain a nation. There are a lot of shitty Americans and I hope Trump gives this guy the same help he would have give Bo Bergdahl. Meanwhile MSM will sell pointless patriotic hurr durr to pressure their return.Jan 4, 2019, 11:04 PMUS WARNS US CITIZENS TO EXERCISE CAUTION IN CHINA”
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/china-travel-advisory.html
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-03 15:38:00 UTC
it is more than industry, but yes that is close. it is a metric for governance.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-03 14:42:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080836734798217216
Reply addressees: @BrownTsuga @tritzerfanitzer @nntaleb
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080819893405020160
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080819893405020160