We cannot stop high trust ethnic europeans from demonstrating high trust and subsequent vulnerability to suggestion – but we can outlaw suggestion.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 09:13:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090176005417955328
We cannot stop ethnic europeans from demonstrating high trust and subsequent vulnerability to suggestion without also destroying that high trust itself – but we can outlaw suggestion of that which high trust people are vulnerable to. No more lies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 04:12:00 UTC
https://thedailycoin.org/2018/12/19/paul-craig-roberts-overthrow-is-the-only-answer-video/THE WINDOW SHIFTS
https://thedailycoin.org/2018/12/19/paul-craig-roberts-overthrow-is-the-only-answer-video/
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 03:59:00 UTC
More on the way. He keeps his word. We will get a wall.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 01:04:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090052907741995008
Reply addressees: @CNN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090052588546990080
IN REPLY TO:
@CNN
Delayed paychecks, reduced working hours, and stalled contracts led to a loss of about $11 billion in gross domestic product over the five-week partial government shutdown, according to a Congressional Budget Office report https://t.co/3YW8vlNrFT
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090052588546990080
Every poll I’ve seen says the same thing: supporters don’t waver. The committed democrats and the undecideds varied. Not the he can win with 41%, but, the troops don’t flinch. They just get angrier ever day ….
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 22:52:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090019737625653249
Reply addressees: @karlbykarlsmith
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090012851224354819
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090012851224354819
By Eli Harman
I was just reminded of an old argument of Bryan Caplan’s.
One argument he makes for open borders involves a hypothetical. Say one of us went to Haiti, on an aid mission or something. When they were… https://www.facebook.com/741197263/posts/10156946947927264/
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 20:20:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089981629139963906
Another topic via Nick Dahlheim:
Just as social safety (redistribution) is incompatible with immigration, Abortion is incompatible with immigration.
I’m fine with social safety and abortion as long as it’s not suicide by immigration.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 17:00:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089931213895282688
By Eli Harman
I was just reminded of an old argument of Bryan Caplan’s.
One argument he makes for open borders involves a hypothetical. Say one of us went to Haiti, on an aid mission or something. When they were done and ready to come back, we tell them “no, you can’t come back. You have to stay in Haiti.” That would be a dick thing to do to one of our own, argues Bryan Kaplan, and therefore it’s a dick thing to do to Haitians too.
The difference, of course. Is that in the one case, we are inflicting the shittiness of Haiti on one of our own, by denying their request to return. While in the other case, we are PREVENTING Haitians (who are not our ingroup) from inflicting the shittiness of Haiti on ALL of our own, by denying their request to enter. So they are not in any way, shape, or form, equivalent cases.
This is an example of casuistry (sometimes known as “pilpul”) improperly reasoning from a specific case to a general rule, in this case a bad rule that accomplishes parasitic and destructive ends desired by Bryan Caplan for malicious reasons (Bryan Caplan is by his own admission, scared of majorities and reflexively desires to undermine and attack them. He is a majorityphobe. But Bryan Caplan’s insecurities and ethnic fragility inpose no obligations on us to cater to them.) Casuistry (“Pilpul”) is the cornerstone of their arts of deception and their parasitic group evolutionary strategies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 15:20:00 UTC
–“WHAT ABOUT NEPOTISM IN THE MONARCHY?”–
The evidence is that families guard their status jealously and that fratricide and patricide are the most common origins of regicide.
Secondly, a monarchy has only to defend the very longest term interest and its income from the overall performance of the polity.
Monarchies have exceptional records for almost all of human history with the fragility not one of nepotism (since a monarchy has management teams selected from across the realm, many of whom are the best shareholders), but monarchies fail because agrarian production was the only means of competition and therefore territorial expansion the only means of competition. And territorial expansion only achievable by the high risk and high cost of european warfare and consequent ransom.
The monarchies simply DID NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO when the landed and military aristocracy was replaced by the commercial aristocracy, and after the french revolution, the church aristocracy replaced by the state bureaucracy.
We know what to do: Increase participation to shift, then decrease participation once shifted. Increase participation by expanding the franchise for each additional class, or decrease the franchise for each additional class once the change has been implemented. During that era guns were far more effective at forcing political change than archers. So the state could no longer use professional warriors to deny the franchise.
The only solution is to retain the franchise for those who have demonstrated interests in the preservation of rule of law and the discretion of the monarchy, the republic, or the democracy in the determination of the production of commons.
THere no longer a force on earth that can occupy territory against men with small arms (battle rifles) and rpg’s (close proximity man-portable artillery). It cannot be done. Ergo the transition is complete and we have restored the symmetry of power between men.
WE need only choose to impose our will on those who would deprive us of rule of law, and the reciprocity that rule of law both depends upon and enforces.
It is very hard to read Hoppe, Michels, and Burnham (or machiavelli for that matter) and not understand this.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 12:52:00 UTC
I thought he already ruined that brand…. why not top of his career with ruining an election? lol
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 00:45:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089685867306909697
Reply addressees: @kvnryn77 @HowardSchultz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089682978098298880
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089682978098298880