(FB 1552332255 Timestamp) https://chinadailymail.com/2013/10/15/six-wars-china-is-sure-to-fight-in-the-next-50-years
Theme: Governance
-
(FB 1552315925 Timestamp) ACCORDING TO RAND, WE ALWAYS LOSE In simulated World W
(FB 1552315925 Timestamp) ACCORDING TO RAND, WE ALWAYS LOSE In simulated World War III scenarios, the U.S. continues to lose against Russia and China, two top war planners warned last week. âIn our games, when we fight Russia and China, blue gets its a– handed to it” RAND analyst David Ochmanek said Thursday. RAND’s wargames show how US Armed Forces – colored blue on wargame maps – experience the most substantial losses in one scenario after another and still can’t thwart Russia or China – which predictably is red – from accomplishing their objectives: annihilating Western forces. “We lose a lot of people. We lose a lot of equipment. We usually fail to achieve our objective of preventing aggression by the adversary,” he warned. In the next military conflict, which some believe may come as soon as the mid-2020s, all five battlefield domains: land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace, will be heavily contested, suggesting the U.S. could have a difficult time in achieving superiority as it has in prior conflicts. The simulated war games showed, the “red” aggressor force often destroys U.S. F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters on the runway, sends several Naval fleets to the depths, destroys US military bases, and through electronic warfare, takes control of critical military communication systems. In short, a gruesome, if simulated, annihilation of some of the most modern of US forces. âIn every case I know of,â said Robert Work, a former deputy secretary of defense with years of wargaming experience, âthe F-35 rules the sky when itâs in the sky, but it gets killed on the ground in large numbers.â So, as Russia and China develop fifth-generation fighters and hypersonic missiles, âthings that rely on sophisticated base infrastructures like runways and fuel tanks are going to have a hard time,â Ochmanek said. âThings that sail on the surface of the sea are going to have a hard time.â “Thatâs why the 2020 budget coming out next week retires the carrier USS Truman decades early and cuts two amphibious landing ships, as weâve reported. Itâs also why the Marine Corps is buying the jump-jet version of the F-35, which can take off and land from tiny, ad hoc airstrips, but how well they can maintain a high-tech aircraft in low-tech surroundings is an open question,” said Breaking Defense. Meanwhile, speaking purely hypothetically of course, “if we went to war in Europe, there would be one Patriot battery moving, and it would go to Ramstein. And thatâs it,â Work complained. The US has 58 Brigade Combat Teams across the continent but doesn’t have anti-air and missile-defense capabilities required to handle a barrage of missiles from Russia. RAND also war-gamed cyber and electronic attacks in the simulations, Work said; Russia and China tend to cripple US communication networks. “Whenever we have an exercise and the red force really destroys our command and control, we stop the exercise,” Work said without a trace of humor. Beijing calls this âsystem destruction warfare,â Work said. They aim to âattack the American battle network at all levels, relentlessly, and they practice it all the time.â The Air Force asked RAND to formulate a plan several years ago to improve the outcomes of the wargames in favor of the US, Ochmanek said. âWe found it impossible to spend more than $8 billion a year” to fix the problems. “Thatâs $8 billion for the Air Force. Triple that to cover for the Army and the Navy Department (which includes the US Marines),” Ochmanek said, “and you get $24 billion.” Work was less concerned about the near-term risk of war, and he said, China and Russia aren’t ready to fight because their modernization efforts have not been completed. He said any major conflict is unlikely for another 10 to 20 years from now. He said “$24 billion a year for the next five years would be a good expenditure” to prepare the military for World War III. RAND offers a sobering assessment that America could lose a multi-front war in the future, which is quite shocking considering that the US spent nearly three times as much as the second biggest war power, China, did in 2017.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552168499 Timestamp) Break the Cycle. Nationalism.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1552332255 Timestamp) https://chinadailymail.com/2013/10/15/six-wars-china-is-sure-to-fight-in-the-next-50-years
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552604252 Timestamp) —“Force should be asserted early and often to insure the expected treatment that you demand of others and conversely what others expect of you.”—Jarrod Marma
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552676502 Timestamp) It will take only one gathering of 1M men. —“Curt Doolittle with all of your followers you could pull this off today. Whatâs the hold up?”—Steven Gant A moral license (100%) A set of demands (constitution 60%) A a plan of transition (70%) A mens of insurrection (100%) My solution makes people like Yang look like kindergarten teachers. It’s mostly organic. In all our people’s interests. And it is almost impossible to resist – other than by politicians, bureaucrats, and the financial sector. The worst thing you can do is bring a product to market too early, or to move from research and development to marketing, or from marketing to expansion, before the market is ready. As I said to other ‘leadership’. The only thing it will take within a year, is for about 12 of us to ‘agree’ to stay on message, and it’s done. Any one of those who doesn’t agree is done forever. So it will be some set of them. But it has to suit the timing. Timing matters.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1552674548 Timestamp) GOOGLE, TWITTER, FB ARE RAPIDLY EMERGING AS ENEMIES FOR NOT ONLY FOREIGN BUT DOMESTIC PEOPLES https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2019/03/14/top-us-general-google-is-indirectly-benefiting-the-chinese-military/
-
(FB 1552687925 Timestamp) —“THE OVERTON WINDOW JUST SHIFTED IN EPIC PROPORTION
(FB 1552687925 Timestamp) —“THE OVERTON WINDOW JUST SHIFTED IN EPIC PROPORTIONS”–
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1552678775 Timestamp) WHY WW2 WAS NOT A GOOD OR MORAL WAR 1-The war was made possible with conscription, taxation, inflation, censorship and central planning of the economy. 2-Western governments are greatly responsible for the rise of Hitler with the very unfair Versailles Treaty, but also with things like the Young and Dawes Plans. 3-The Allies were not morally goods. They consisted of imperialist and colonialist powers, allied to the even more evil communist regime of Stalin. 4-Nazi Germany did not want war with the West. Their ambitions were to reclaim German lands and create their own empire out of the USSR. France and Britain declared war to Germany and refused all peace offers, making the war a world war, instead of a regional war between Hitler and Stalin. 5-The unintended consequences: Millions died, unmeasurable wealth was destroyed so that Hitlerâs regime could be replaced by something even more evil. Stalin gained half of Europe, then Mao gained China, then communism spread to many former western colonies in Africa and Asia. In the Western countries WW2 gave rise to the military industrial complex, the welfare state, and Keynesian management of the economy. Everywhere the State is the big winner of WW2. https://youtu.be/mvlKe6ETyDE?fbclid=IwAR1_rLdL2CjErRt-u03giLa1yzRgKZ5LAxvt-2YGgEUIgnhC6f19qUuMXEg
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552677534 Timestamp) I have known for almost two decades. For you it’s just realizing you have no other choice. That it’s just you me, and the rest of us willing to act. And that’s it. We are the men of the west and we are either the first of the rest or the end of the west. The bottleneck or the flood. You choose. you choose to make the choice. Life and limb for eternity. it’s not complicated. It’s just a measurement you can’t fudge.