(FB 1549742755 Timestamp) SHOW PREP – J.F. Gariepy WHY OPEN DISCOURSE IN PUBLIC? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975600062264 THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975353527264 TOTAL MENTIONS OF SPENCER https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975165307264 THE LANGUAGES OF MALE PACKS https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975183877264 WHY TALK OF REVOLT, REVOLUTION, CIVIL WAR? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975175932264 LEGIT CRITICISM OF PROP https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975105752264 ANOTHER LEGIT CRITICISM OF PROP https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156971446347264 MOST LEGIT CRITICISMS OF PROP https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156811437002264 ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS FOR SUPREMACY? https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155415610782264
Theme: Governance
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549735651 Timestamp) WHY CALLS FOR REVOLUTION AND CIVIL WAR —“Can you explain this call to violence, revolution, or civil war?”—Justin Ptak If enough people talk about it the general discourse changes sufficiently to discuss alternatives to the status quo.) Same as ‘the best way to prevent a war is to be ready to crush any opponent easily at all times”. The best way to bring an opponent to the negotiating table is the certainty (lower risk) that it is better than the alternative.
-
On Criticism of Working in Public “Curt: Why No Secrecy!!!”
AGAINST CRITICISM ON WORKING IN PUBLIC February 9th, 2019 POLICY:TRANSPARENCY (i.e. “CURT: WHY NO SECRECY!!!”) 1 – I do my work out in the open with my real name. I always have. 2 – I educate our people on how to produce and implement a restoration of the constitution that will allow us reclaim our destiny by constitutional amendment, and certainty of members of the state the rebellion to enact it – or to cause secession between those who do and do not wish so. 3 – I do this to provide an actionable solution that will prevent the bloodiest civil war in human history that is one spark from igniting, and one that has been deterministic since the 1965 socialist transition of immigration from kin to aliens. 4 – I NEVER EVER cross the line to advocacy or organization or participation in direct action. I seek only to make our people understand that if we did choose to revolt that our success is a virtual certainty and therefore to make the state end its denial that we would. 5 – If you cannot do the same then I can’t be associated with you, and I don’t want to. You are a danger to me and our people 6 – All ‘secret’ activity only attracts the wrong people, with the wrong incentives, to engaging in the wrong behaviors, that will end in their and our harm. 7 – All any action by the state against me as a thought leader working on restoration of the constitution to prevent its usurpation, and the creation of policies in the defense of our people from economic, cultural, and genetic predation would only serve to demonstrate to the people we seek to reach the corruption of that government, and in turn grant additional legitimacy to both the promise of my work, and the promise of our ability to force our self defense into the body of law. 8 – If we must, at some future time, act, then we must and will act toward a moral end, with an actionable plan, and all act at once. And in the interim we must constraint all lunatics from preventing our expansion into the majority and the provision of solutions for the vast majority of our people – exclusive of those fools, traitors and enemies among them. 9 – Only the more sophisticated followers understand how I use the ‘marketplace’ of the internet to criticize ideas, whittle away at them, and discover those few grains of truth therein. Only the more sophisticated followers understand how I use the king of the hill game to run those tests. At any given time I might be testing any set of ideas by king of the hill games, to get you to defeat them so that I understand how to replace those ideas with better ones. I don’t want you to understand what I am doing. If you undrestand I am playing this game, and running these tests, then their utility declines. The secret to any psychological testing is to work indirectly by appealing to people’s intuitions such that their natural tendency to signal rather than report is circumvented. This is is how I work. I create games that indirectly allow me to discover possibilities. I do not start with presumptions, I simply start with what is presumed, and attack it until only a few grains of truth remain. With those gains of truth I then reconstruct the law. What we do with that law is up to us – should we obtain the power to enforce its adoption. And I must convince you only that we both have the power, and that the laws once enacted will serve our purposes. This means that all my work was in the construction of the law, the rest is only the policy we enact by that law, and the incentives of citizens to use the law to suppress, defeat, or exit those who continue the 2500 year war against our people. Thank you for your time. -Curt Doolittle ====== FROMl: thisisnotmyemail@hotmail.com REGARDING: https://ordoevangelistarum.com/ Sir, I love your thoughts but am not happy with your boomer-tier tools. Thomas Lewis from Ordo Evangelistarum has the right ideas when it comes to implementing websites, forums, and comms. He only uses open source programs that have been rigorously tested. He is also friends with some honorable computer nerds that help him out. You use gmail. For the love of god, why? I’m not emailing you only to be flagged by the crazed technocrats at google for not thinking like them. Discord is run by a bunch of SJWs who do not share anything with you in common either. Once again, I wont be using discord. Open source alternatives like OE is using. 1) comms. Riot app using decentralized matrix servers. Thomas has his own server which he controls. I prefer servers in third world countries because why not. 2) Forum. He uses Discord which is simple and effective and once again, you control it yourself. At least use some free tools that arent made around collecting user data to sell. Other than that, my respect for you overrides any disdain I have for your boomer tech strategy. ====
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549826297 Timestamp) —“All forms of governance (as in Aristotle’s definitions) distill down to one thing – obtaining a monopoly on law making i.e. subversion of nomocracy.”—Bill Joslin
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549824263 Timestamp) THE COMMON MAN’S DUTY OF CAUTION Elites (by meritocracy) is to not interfere in the elite’s production of that order of production we call family, society, economy, polity, and war upon which all of us depend.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549827357 Timestamp) NOBLESSE OBLIGE INSTEAD OF TOLERANCE by Luke Weinhagen Noblesse Oblige is as close as we should ever get to the concept people currently mislabel âtoleranceâ. It is a form of forbearance that can be extended to individuals not directly known to, but still within the sphere of responsibility of, the one offering it. (Successful application of forbearance, much like successful application of reciprocity, will end up one of the traits used to recognize competent elites from incompetent elites)
(CD: brilliant. consider this canon)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549826658 Timestamp) Will “Sun Wheel” images get you banned? Are our ancestral religious symbols banned on FB?
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549826297 Timestamp) —“All forms of governance (as in Aristotle’s definitions) distill down to one thing – obtaining a monopoly on law making i.e. subversion of nomocracy.”—Bill Joslin
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549847452 Timestamp) GETTING IT DONE My understanding of the current situation is that the previous generation of the alt right is dead, and that certain people need to disappear for progress to be made without them boat-anchoring everyone. There are, as always, three different clans that reflect the possible means of exercising power… authoritarian <–> market <-> religious … with overlap, and as in all things, that these clans have common genetic interests, but uncommon methods of achieving them. My preference is that this is the standard we all approach the clans with, and that we agree to fight the status quo from three angles. But that we do not try to determine which order is best, since all orders are necessary, to serve the three power structures, and the elites in each of the three power structures. The reality is that there are limited options available to us. And that those options will favor a legalistic solution as the lowest cost price of entry. That religion has zero hope of anything other than obtaining exclusivity, and that authority requires individuals to emerge capable of that roles – and we have none outside of the military. We have anglos (north and west) the anglo scots irish (the south), and the germans and the scandinavians (the center). The evidence is that of them, the only ones who fight and have military experience are the southerners. The germans never fight. The scandinavians are still cucks, and the anglos are too privileged to do much. We have a potential of going mainstream, while the religious can follow us if we gain momentum, they can do nothing on their own. All the authoritarians can do is form special forces (prosecutors of enemies) so to speak. That is all that can happen. Our (and my) position is that we are better off ‘leaving the alt right behind’ as a failed movement, and will gain normie cred if we either do so, distance ourselves from, or are ‘enemies’ of the hard right. This election is basically our last demographic and political chance so I am not terribly interested in pragmatisms. This sh-t has to get done.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549827459 Timestamp) DEBATE IS ABOUT THE AUDIENCE by Steven Kolpek —“It is the most effective recruiting tool we have found. The people with whom we argue are immaterial. It’s the people that ‘sense something right’ in our arguments that we seek to attract by taking advantage of the attention (advertising) you create by your attempted criticism.”—CD Public debate is less about convincing the opponent, and more about attracting and teaching the audience. The process is super fun when you get someone who bites the bait and runs through the GSRM tactics like clockwork so you end up making them look silly while present Truths for viewers to munch on.