(FB 1541955376 Timestamp) -THE RIGHT: TRIPARTISM LIVES ON- Hard Right (Aristocratic, Martial, Judicial[prosecutorial]) … Middle Right (Commercial, Reciprocal, Legal[contractual]) … … Soft Right (Priestly, Moral, Religious[adherent])
Theme: Governance
-
The Right: Tripartism Lives On
(FB 1541955376 Timestamp) -THE RIGHT: TRIPARTISM LIVES ON- Hard Right (Aristocratic, Martial, Judicial[prosecutorial]) … Middle Right (Commercial, Reciprocal, Legal[contractual]) … … Soft Right (Priestly, Moral, Religious[adherent])
-
Christian (federated) Monarchies (rule of Law Kings) Are the Optimum Political Order
(FB 1541953554 Timestamp) CHRISTIAN (FEDERATED) MONARCHIES (RULE OF LAW KINGS) ARE THE OPTIMUM POLITICAL ORDER @Lord_Keynes2 Monarchs have a very bad record. They engage in war and conquest, acquire multi-ethnic empires, become cosmopolitans, and then it all falls apart: e.g., Ottoman empire, Russian empire, Austro-Hungarian empire, etc. Replying to @Lord_Keynes2 I notice you aren’t mentioning the german manorial states, the scandinavian, the french polish or italian…. Replying to @Lord_Keynes2 Empires capture trade routes. Monarchies captured productive land. Both centralize rents in exchange for increasing local economic velocity. Study of european castle distribution illustrates rather easily the exceptional relationship between martial+judicial and std of living. Replying to @Lord_Keynes2 Ergo the issue is not empire nor monarchy, but ETHNICITY. ie: ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, and trading ethnocentricity for rents at the cost of multicultural conflict is a short term win at long term cost.
-
Christian (federated) Monarchies (rule of Law Kings) Are the Optimum Political Order
(FB 1541953554 Timestamp) CHRISTIAN (FEDERATED) MONARCHIES (RULE OF LAW KINGS) ARE THE OPTIMUM POLITICAL ORDER @Lord_Keynes2 Monarchs have a very bad record. They engage in war and conquest, acquire multi-ethnic empires, become cosmopolitans, and then it all falls apart: e.g., Ottoman empire, Russian empire, Austro-Hungarian empire, etc. Replying to @Lord_Keynes2 I notice you aren’t mentioning the german manorial states, the scandinavian, the french polish or italian…. Replying to @Lord_Keynes2 Empires capture trade routes. Monarchies captured productive land. Both centralize rents in exchange for increasing local economic velocity. Study of european castle distribution illustrates rather easily the exceptional relationship between martial+judicial and std of living. Replying to @Lord_Keynes2 Ergo the issue is not empire nor monarchy, but ETHNICITY. ie: ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, and trading ethnocentricity for rents at the cost of multicultural conflict is a short term win at long term cost.
-
The Experiment Is Over and The Jury Is In
(FB 1541951913 Timestamp) THE EXPERIMENT IS OVER AND THE JURY IS IN The jury is in. Monarchs produce better commons. the fewer the people in politics the better. The more powerful the law in resisting the king, a government, or each other, and the more powerful the militia in resisting all above, the better. Liberalism in the sense of rule of law won. Monarchy in the sense of production of commons won. Fascism in the sense of state nationalism, ethnocentrism, state capitalism, and intolerance for competition on other than economic means, won. Why? it’s the optimum decision making structure because it is the optimum means of accommodating differences in knowledge and incentives.
-
The Experiment Is Over and The Jury Is In
(FB 1541951913 Timestamp) THE EXPERIMENT IS OVER AND THE JURY IS IN The jury is in. Monarchs produce better commons. the fewer the people in politics the better. The more powerful the law in resisting the king, a government, or each other, and the more powerful the militia in resisting all above, the better. Liberalism in the sense of rule of law won. Monarchy in the sense of production of commons won. Fascism in the sense of state nationalism, ethnocentrism, state capitalism, and intolerance for competition on other than economic means, won. Why? it’s the optimum decision making structure because it is the optimum means of accommodating differences in knowledge and incentives.
-
Jordan Peterson’s Strategy Explained for The Hard (aristocratic, Martial, Judicial) Right
(FB 1541950854 Timestamp) JORDAN PETERSON’S STRATEGY EXPLAINED FOR THE HARD (ARISTOCRATIC, MARTIAL, JUDICIAL) RIGHT Peterson preserves his ability to maintain a low intensity conflict, under the illusion that it is merely a low intensity conflict, as a defensive means of CONTINUING a low intensity conflict for a long period, and thereby accumulating attrition upon the enemy by continuous, incremental, cumulative means. THE RIGHT’S INTERPRETATION OF HIS ACTIONS The Aristocratic (Truth Telling Warrior) and Judicial (Truth Telling Natural Law) and Defensive Function (truth as extension of disgust, purity, loyalty) of both Martial and Judicial Aristocracy (“The Right”) objects to this technique – but in doing so, illustrates why Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Darwin, Nietzsche, and Military Grand Strategy are necessary courses of study: so that we do not confuse the moral, ideal, and eternal with the scientific, the real, and the temporal: we must retain REASON and AGENCY because of the PARTICULAR CASE, and not resort to HABIT and INTUITION because of the GENERAL standards of measure we rely upon for our group strategy. THE CORRECT CRITICISM OF PETERSON (AND HIS PEERS) My complaint against Peterson is consistent: (1) Truth proper is enough for western civilization because it is the source of the uniqueness of western civilization, and (2) his claim that wisdom (choice) is the same as truth (decidability) in order to (3) preserve his malinvestment in middle eastern literature (intuitionism) instead of exclusively western literature (reason), because (4) he practices his method of cognitive behavioral therapy (stoicism), by using storytelling (providing the objectivity of the observer) as a means of suggestion (which does succeed), instead of action ( demonstration), and self authority. And he does this because (5) he is artful in the technique of manipulation by suggestion using narrative analogy, and possess moral intent – but (6) failing to grasp that the entirety of the problem facing western civilization is that by not forbidding that technique of suggestion, we leave open the MAJORITY USE OF IT, by those who have possessed immoral intent: the abrahamists, marxists, feminist, and postmodernists. Because (7) we evolved to be suggestable by mothers using the feminine speech pattern, and it is the weaponization of that speech pattern under Abrahamism, Marxism, postmodernism, feminism – what we call ‘religious thought’ that has exploited the weakness not only in the modern Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist era, but also in the ancient Zoroastrian, Abrahamic (jewish, christian, islamic) era, that brought about the dark ages, leaving ONLY THE FAR EAST (by design) and sub-saharan africa (by cost of access) insulated from the exploitation of this vulnerability. THEREFORE Think of Peterson as tying some number of the enemy down in the the narrows (Thermopylae) while we (the army and navy) martial our intellectual (strategic) and physical (revolt, civil war). They cannot afford to lose this battle with him. (and they are losing it). But it is up to us to defeat them, crush the army of deceit (Abrahamic, Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist) and to restore Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, The Rule of Natural Law, and Markets in Everything that result from all of the above, with TOTAL DENIAL OF THE ENEMY of the field of exploiting our people’s weakness to suggestion by ‘want of the comforting and desirable narrative of our mothers that calms us in times of stress’. Curt Doolittle The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine. -
Jordan Peterson’s Strategy Explained for The Hard (aristocratic, Martial, Judicial) Right
(FB 1541950854 Timestamp) JORDAN PETERSON’S STRATEGY EXPLAINED FOR THE HARD (ARISTOCRATIC, MARTIAL, JUDICIAL) RIGHT Peterson preserves his ability to maintain a low intensity conflict, under the illusion that it is merely a low intensity conflict, as a defensive means of CONTINUING a low intensity conflict for a long period, and thereby accumulating attrition upon the enemy by continuous, incremental, cumulative means. THE RIGHT’S INTERPRETATION OF HIS ACTIONS The Aristocratic (Truth Telling Warrior) and Judicial (Truth Telling Natural Law) and Defensive Function (truth as extension of disgust, purity, loyalty) of both Martial and Judicial Aristocracy (“The Right”) objects to this technique – but in doing so, illustrates why Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Darwin, Nietzsche, and Military Grand Strategy are necessary courses of study: so that we do not confuse the moral, ideal, and eternal with the scientific, the real, and the temporal: we must retain REASON and AGENCY because of the PARTICULAR CASE, and not resort to HABIT and INTUITION because of the GENERAL standards of measure we rely upon for our group strategy. THE CORRECT CRITICISM OF PETERSON (AND HIS PEERS) My complaint against Peterson is consistent: (1) Truth proper is enough for western civilization because it is the source of the uniqueness of western civilization, and (2) his claim that wisdom (choice) is the same as truth (decidability) in order to (3) preserve his malinvestment in middle eastern literature (intuitionism) instead of exclusively western literature (reason), because (4) he practices his method of cognitive behavioral therapy (stoicism), by using storytelling (providing the objectivity of the observer) as a means of suggestion (which does succeed), instead of action ( demonstration), and self authority. And he does this because (5) he is artful in the technique of manipulation by suggestion using narrative analogy, and possess moral intent – but (6) failing to grasp that the entirety of the problem facing western civilization is that by not forbidding that technique of suggestion, we leave open the MAJORITY USE OF IT, by those who have possessed immoral intent: the abrahamists, marxists, feminist, and postmodernists. Because (7) we evolved to be suggestable by mothers using the feminine speech pattern, and it is the weaponization of that speech pattern under Abrahamism, Marxism, postmodernism, feminism – what we call ‘religious thought’ that has exploited the weakness not only in the modern Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist era, but also in the ancient Zoroastrian, Abrahamic (jewish, christian, islamic) era, that brought about the dark ages, leaving ONLY THE FAR EAST (by design) and sub-saharan africa (by cost of access) insulated from the exploitation of this vulnerability. THEREFORE Think of Peterson as tying some number of the enemy down in the the narrows (Thermopylae) while we (the army and navy) martial our intellectual (strategic) and physical (revolt, civil war). They cannot afford to lose this battle with him. (and they are losing it). But it is up to us to defeat them, crush the army of deceit (Abrahamic, Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist) and to restore Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, The Rule of Natural Law, and Markets in Everything that result from all of the above, with TOTAL DENIAL OF THE ENEMY of the field of exploiting our people’s weakness to suggestion by ‘want of the comforting and desirable narrative of our mothers that calms us in times of stress’. Curt Doolittle The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine. -
Our Solution – and Our Limited Function in It.
(FB 1541945323 Timestamp) OUR SOLUTION – AND OUR LIMITED FUNCTION IN IT. 1) We are the JUDGES of the NATURAL LAW – the JUDGES of our polity. “Those Who State Limits.” 2) There are warriors, artists, scientists, engineers, craftsman, doctors, and mothers. Their jobs are ‘what shall we do and ‘how shall we do it’. Our job in the division of labor – a division of unequal knowledge and function – but equal duty and responsibility. 3) Signals alone will drive excellence out of what we shall do, if natural law is imposed upon them since the GOOD and EXCELLENT are the only means possible available to them. 4) Our men will build valhalla because we leave them no other choice. Our men will make immortality because we leave them no other choice. Our men will reach the stars because we leave them no other choice. We do not need instruct them to do so because we leave them no other choice. 5) As judges we must prosecute violators of the natural law. No matter who, where, and when they may be. 6) Our way is War: to eliminate that which is bad – leaving those with less agency to produce only that which is good. We parent mankind by this means alone. Not by telling them what to do. But by telling them what not to do, and leaving them to discover all possible means of doing what else they may do? It is for the lesser people – all who have failed – to anchor their people in an era by stating that which they must or should do other than avoid or defeat that which is false or bad. The uniqueness of western civilization is sovereignty reciprocity truth, duty, and the law – producing markets of the good by eliminating the bad, and thereby continuously calculating our transformation into gods – omniscient and omnipotent – by the fastest means possible: trial and error.
-
Our Solution – and Our Limited Function in It.
(FB 1541945323 Timestamp) OUR SOLUTION – AND OUR LIMITED FUNCTION IN IT. 1) We are the JUDGES of the NATURAL LAW – the JUDGES of our polity. “Those Who State Limits.” 2) There are warriors, artists, scientists, engineers, craftsman, doctors, and mothers. Their jobs are ‘what shall we do and ‘how shall we do it’. Our job in the division of labor – a division of unequal knowledge and function – but equal duty and responsibility. 3) Signals alone will drive excellence out of what we shall do, if natural law is imposed upon them since the GOOD and EXCELLENT are the only means possible available to them. 4) Our men will build valhalla because we leave them no other choice. Our men will make immortality because we leave them no other choice. Our men will reach the stars because we leave them no other choice. We do not need instruct them to do so because we leave them no other choice. 5) As judges we must prosecute violators of the natural law. No matter who, where, and when they may be. 6) Our way is War: to eliminate that which is bad – leaving those with less agency to produce only that which is good. We parent mankind by this means alone. Not by telling them what to do. But by telling them what not to do, and leaving them to discover all possible means of doing what else they may do? It is for the lesser people – all who have failed – to anchor their people in an era by stating that which they must or should do other than avoid or defeat that which is false or bad. The uniqueness of western civilization is sovereignty reciprocity truth, duty, and the law – producing markets of the good by eliminating the bad, and thereby continuously calculating our transformation into gods – omniscient and omnipotent – by the fastest means possible: trial and error.