Theme: Governance

  • (CD: in historical terms, governance must be placed back under rule of law, ther

    —(CD: in historical terms, governance must be placed back under rule of law, thereby reversing the replacement of rule of law by rule by legislation, then fraudulently calling it rule of law. Thereby restoring the separation between judge of last resort (monarchy), judiciary (the courts), governance (ministers), market for the production of commons (parliament), and the markets that depend upon them: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, and polities.)—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-15 22:04:26 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10637306657148695

  • DEFINITIONAL NITS: I USE:0. Natural Law of Reciprocity1. State: Portfolio of Ass

    DEFINITIONAL NITS: I USE:0. Natural Law of Reciprocity1. State: Portfolio of Assets (Capital)2. Monarchy (Judge of Last Resort)3. Rule (Decide conflicts): Judiciary4. Govern (Manage Operations) : Ministers, Cabinet, etc5. Market For Commons (Funding) : Parliament, Congress.6. Market for goods and services (economy): Economy7. Nation (market for association, cooperation, reproduction)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-15 22:04:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10637304557148664

  • One of the most effective tactics I saw in ukraine was building walls of tires,

    One of the most effective tactics I saw in ukraine was building walls of tires, filling them with dirt, gravel, rocks, or anything, and lighting some of them on fire to create smoke. Tires are everywhere in a city. a vehicle without tires is barrier and concealment. And tires filled with dirt are cover, ‘berms’, that stop bullets. Smoke provides concealment, and men in concealment can throw molotovs. There was no way to get into the center except on foot. tanker trucks, bridges, tires, smoke. siege. It is very difficult for a military or police to fire on citizens and have a government survive. Ever policeman or soldier is signing his own warrant. Every commander betting he won’t be hung. It is easy to talk about it. It is very difficult to do it. Conversely, It is very easy to fire on military and police who attack civilian positions of resistance in a siege.the military uses concrete and heavy machines. the citizenry uses tires, dirt, gasoline, glass, and a lot of arm and leg work. the central problem is not this strategy it is as simple as supplying the citizens with porta-potty’s food, bottles, and gasoline. Then the gradual taking, looting, offices so that the bureaucracy cannot go to work and organize, and the politicians gradually lose power, and the police and firemen start to stay home. In ukraine they were stalking police back to their homes. Eventually, as long as the pressure of continuous expansion of citizen held territory expands, and more and more institutions are inoperable, and banks close, and businesses close, and traffic stops, and gasoline runes out, the state must choose to become what they claim they are not, or to acquiesce as they have every single time in the past. Therefore the problem a revolution faces is simply making moral demands on behalf of the people, so that it is possible for the government to give in.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-15 21:58:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10637269657148129

  • Libertarians believe the ‘oppression’ narrative rather than the ‘domestication’

    Libertarians believe the ‘oppression’ narrative rather than the ‘domestication’ narrative. Evidence is that leadership domesticates the lower classes. Better leadership culls them deliberately.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-15 16:39:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1128701445321183235

  • REVOLUTIONIn the USA it is far easier to end up with 100M dead than 10M. It’s no

    REVOLUTIONIn the USA it is far easier to end up with 100M dead than 10M. It’s not the revolution that’s complicated. It’s almost trivial. The problem is limiting it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-14 23:36:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10629219957064286

  • In 2006 I said correction would occur in 2008, take until 2014 to return, collap

    In 2006 I said correction would occur in 2008, take until 2014 to return, collapse again in 17-20, and revolution between 19 and 25. I went public in 2014 with revolution is coming. but avoided politics until trump phenomenon. People said “never happen”. Well, not so…


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-14 17:22:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1128349928055554050

    Reply addressees: @RBartou

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1128349256849469440


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RBartou

    @curtdoolittle What happened?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1128349256849469440

  • MONARCHY: THE FAMILY IS AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORM OF GOVERNMENT —“The best reason

    MONARCHY: THE FAMILY IS AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORM OF GOVERNMENT

    —“The best reason why Monarchy is a strong government is, that it is an intelligible government. The mass of mankind understand it, and they hardly anywhere in the world understand any other.”—Walter Bagehot

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-14 16:37:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1128338619155009536

  • THE COMING OLIGARCHY You see the result of the revolution will mostly likely be

    THE COMING OLIGARCHY
    You see the result of the revolution will mostly likely be an oligarchy – wherein the europeans rule a population incapable of self rule, or participation in peerage.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-14 16:31:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1128337085008633857

  • BUILDING NUMBERS SUFFICIENT TO WIN —The question is how are we going to build

    BUILDING NUMBERS SUFFICIENT TO WIN
    —The question is how are we going to build an alliance capable of actually winning?—
    0) acknowledging the groups and their incentives – and that their frames are not alterable.1) producing material incentives (policy) that cross frames and even boundaries (gain the middle)2) varying anything necessary above to obtain power.3) seizing a window of opportunity that crosses boundaries.4) being the only people left standing with a solution that crosses boundaries.
    One does not, if one is a general of any merit, attempt to produce a given outcome, only to produce any outcome among the set of possible and probabilistic outcomes.
    One does not propose that which generates resistance by the people, only the state.
    Napoleon was a genius because he prepared like hell to seize opportunity. Everyone else of merit other than sun tsu has used technology, or resources, or both. He took an unregulated peasantry and muskets and mobilized an entire country to seize continuous opportunities in a world where battle had turned into a traditional dance.
    Mao was a genius because he played country against city, by seizing opportunity because of divisiveness between city and rural.
    Lenin(stalin) was an opportunist that could play the rural against the urban, and the jewish against the russian. If the jews can destroy the russian empire….
    The Irish won as the afghans did: hit and run until moral legitimacy was lost.
    Hitler(Mussolini),was only possible because of timing. This isn’t possible any longer (secular theology). 
    The french revolution was only possible because france was the most backward government in europe.
    The military rotation back tot he top is pretty simple to accomplish because they share the incentives of the common people from which they come.
    The common man today is being conquered and he knows it. Mao and the irish are the examples. It costs nothing to bring an empire to its knees if in doing so the empire loses its legitimacy.
    So the only problem here is material incentives that people prefer over the current state, sufficient enough to end their resistance, not necessarily obtain their consent or participation.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-14 15:29:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10626294457026504

  • (That is not clear Tom. It depends upon your definition of war. You might say an

    (That is not clear Tom. It depends upon your definition of war. You might say another stabilizing police action in the middle east would be. You might say another act of regime change might be. You certainly can’t make the case for democracy, sure. But reducing iran to somali, syrian, or iraqi condition with warfare rather than policing action is very hard to disagree with, if for no other reason than a nuclear power with a bourse backed by oil, accumulating gold, spreading fundamentalist islam, is simply trading minority jewish communism (pseudoscience) for majority persian islamism (mysticism), and until islam is gutted of such powers, the completion of modernity is as reversible as it was in the ancient world, by the lovely sequence of jewish undermining, christian weakening, and islamic destruction. We made the mistake of empowering turkey. But these peoples cannot be fixed. it’s demographic. They can only be (as the chinese have shown) contained.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-05-14 14:21:41 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10625890157020979