Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • Jun 27, 2019, 6:31 PM CONTINUING THE BRITISH EMPIRE’S POLICING OF INTERNATIONAL

    Jun 27, 2019, 6:31 PM
    CONTINUING THE BRITISH EMPIRE’S POLICING OF INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT, FINANCE AND TRADE – THAT’S WHY

    So that europe could recover and rebuild (they hate us anyway). So that world communism could run its course (fking idiots still didn’t learn). So that world Islamism can run its course (they aren’t white this time so it’s even worse.)

    Why do you think we shouldn’t have (a) resisted the spread of communism to the main source of oil in the pre-2000 world (b) continued the british empires defense of finance and trade in the gulf, (c) made a “special agreement” with the house of Saud to preserver her sovereignty in exchange for controlling the world price of oil, (d) prevented iran from developing a bourse and becoming a dangerous islamic fundamentalist world power controlling half of the world’s oil, (d) used israel as a base of intelligence and military operations for all of the above????

    Why on earth do I waste my time with f*king people who think decisions in world affairs are akin to schoolgirl moralisms between neighbors??????

    The government and media talk to you like you’re stupid using moralisms and righteousness rather than economics and global strategy – because you are stupid.

    STOP WASTING MY TIME WITH “STUPID”.
    Yes, you’re well intentioned, but ignorant and stupid.

    ASK, DON’T TELL.
    You do not have the ability or knowledge to ‘tell’.

    (rant off)
    – Curt

    ( Thank you (and f*k you) very much. 😉 )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:10:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426283758247824

  • “… Curt, you’re a … “— I’m an aristocratic ethnocentric nationalist under

    —“… Curt, you’re a … “—

    I’m an aristocratic ethnocentric nationalist under rule of natural law, with a professional bureaucracy, a monarchy of last resort, and a militia. Which is, quite literally, a secular version of our history from time immemorial. I mean, the fact that I”m writing western civilization’s strategy and philosophy in scientific terms seems to escape people.

    Hosting (farming) subgroups that live together in communities (plantations) has been something we have done for millennia (Quarters, Ghettos). Its profitable. That’s different from equal rights so to speak and devoid of political rights.

    Aesthetically I’m an elitist. Morally I deeply feel noblesse oblige. Pragmatically I see us profiting from the domestication of man. and critically I see that we had our century of european civil war, and left our job incomplete. But other than the middle east, the rest of the world has followed us – if kicking and screaming – into the modernity we created.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:58:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426235900886979

  • “Voting is a tool to reduce violence amongst a warrior class within a polity. Mo

    –“Voting is a tool to reduce violence amongst a
    warrior class within a polity. Modern war
    opened the warrior class to all men and
    therefore the franchise was then extended to
    them. Women are not, as a class, effective
    warriors yet they have been granted the
    rights of fighting men.”–Noah J Revoy

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:58:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426233737644983

  • THE LAW ON GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS Markets are necessary for the production of inves

    THE LAW ON GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS

    Markets are necessary for the production of investments in commons among peoples with uncommon means, uncommon interests, and limited interests to invest. It allows uncommon interests to cooperate by uncommon means, on uncommon ends.

    Voting is only useful for the choice of priority of investments in commons, amongst a group with common means and interest, given limited resources to invest. It allows common interests to cooperate, by common means, on common ends.

    Rule is only useful for the choice of the production of commons in pursuit of a singular design of future conditions, by directing the greatest concentration of resources behind the most direct means of achieving that end.

    Dictatorship is only useful in times of war, when the entirety of the people, their capital, and the territory must be allocated to the production of victory.

    Historically speaking, Durable commons are best produced by monarchy; voting to limit the raising expansion of fees (taxes); and Markets for the production of private goods and services.

    The optimal form of government is the one that makes use of each of these orders only for the circumstances for which it is useful.

    The only possible insurer of that process is a monarchy, professional warriors, and a militia whose franchise depends upon it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:57:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426231781425441

  • TOURNAMENT, PAIR BONDING, CAPITAL, POLITICAL ORDER, POLICY —“What are your tho

    TOURNAMENT, PAIR BONDING, CAPITAL, POLITICAL ORDER, POLICY

    —“What are your thoughts in this case and specifically how it relates to tournament species v. pair bonding species. When society has comfortable stores and capital, where does that leave the pair bonded class compared to the tournament class of human. Considering both male and female it would be common to see the tournament class dominate every time. How does the pair bonded male compete and in socialist arena where the female is taken care of by the greater part of society? Is the socialist economical model naturally doomed by progress of the human condition to become a communal type and deficit living situation?”—Craig Michael

    1. Restore political reciprocity (eliminate redistributions).
    2. Restore voluntary disassociation and association.
    3. Eliminate interest on consumer credit.
    4. Restore the Militia, Regiment and Barracks system (soak up men) and the WPA so we have defense, emergency, and commons production programs for single males.
    5. Enact singapore retirement that is non-attachable or transferrable.
    6. Convert legal marriage to an exchange of limited powers of attorney, and private contract.(what it legally exists as)
    7. Restore the legal definition of ‘marriage’ to a publicly subsidized corporation for the intergeneration production of children.(which is what it exists as)
    8. Restore fault divorce, and restitution for interference in a marriage (make cheating extremely expensive).
    9. Eliminate Alimony, Support, Common property. (restore male contributory portability)
    10. Restore the primacy of policy to family rather than individual.
    11. Eliminate the marriage penalty and maintain the individual penalty (increased taxes on unmarried childless).

    You cannot fix the natural differences between males and females but you can stop the damage we have done to the production of the institution of marriage as a corporation for reproduction production insurance and care.

    TOURNAMENT SPECIES.
    –“Tournament species in zoology are those species in which members of one sex (usually males) compete in order to mate. In tournament species, the reproductive success of the small group of competition winners is predominantly higher than that of the large group of losers.”—

    PAIR BONDING SPECIES
    —“In biology, a pair bond is the strong affinity that develops in some species between a pair consisting of a male and female, or in some cases as a same-sex pairing, potentially leading to producing offspring and/or a lifelong bond.”—

    DISTRIBUTION
    —“Humans are a hybrid between the two, and different individuals fall into different places on the spectrum of pair-bonding vs. tournament. And, tournament women will pretend to be pair bonding to increase their reproductive success, and pair-bonding trending men will adapt themselves to be more tournament-oriented (TheRedPill/Pickup Game is basically all of these).—Anon

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:46:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426185858126992

  • (… continued) Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are

    (… continued)

    Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are of merit, but that we must preserve collective care taking while at the same time limiting the reproduction of the undomesticated animal classes who would reverse the past 50K years of evolutionary progress from animal to human.

    Women are the greatest mass murderers in history, since exposure and dumping of babies and children is the most common source of mortality in human history. Men and their wars are nothing by comparison. The great plagues are nothing by comparison. Yet when women and betas like you are able to force costs upon the rest of us, to produce and immigration dysgenia, you no longer limit your reproduction, no longer delay your reproduction, no longer are denied reproduction, no longer face the hard choice of harsh winters or sexual impulse.

    So no. I’s not an ‘opinion’.
    I’m not stating a difference of opinion or value – I’m stating a FACT.
    Dysgenia is measurable.
    The consequences are measurable.

    You are nothing more than a repeat of the jewish-christian-muslim destruction of the ancient world using the same vocabulary arguments and strategy differing only in using pseudoscience and sophism this time versus supernaturalism and sophism the last.

    You and all like you are the source of dark ages.

    You and all like you are a cancer upon this earth – an uncontrolled dysgenic out-of-control, resource consuming disease consuming society, civilization, man, the planet, and the entirety of human potential with your infantilism.

    You and all like you are a disease upon us all.
    A Cancer. A Cancer we are willing to separate from and let run its course.
    But a cancer we must isolate, inoculate, prevent, and cure our people of.

    So when we say ‘be a man’ we mean ‘save yourselves, our people, our civilization, mankind, the planet and the entirety of human potential from that cancerous non-rational infantilized dysenic group we call marxists, socialists, feminists, postmodernists, politically correct, and inadequate.’

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:11:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425576276514819

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (… continued) So you do not know what and why you feel the way you do. You only sense it is a good. The libertarian does not know why he feels the way he does, he only senses it is good. The conservative does not know why he feels the way he does, only that he senses it is good. However, in the long run the conservative is the only one making use of all available knowledge over the long run. Everything liberals thought would be true in their pseudoscientific rage against the darwinian machine has been false. Man was no oppressed. Semi domesticated human animals like all other animals we domesticated, have been eugenically governed in eastern and western civilization – largely through climate, competitors, and manorialism to produce society with superior distributions. ANd your ‘privilege’ of hyperconsumption and violation of the many compromises between the generations, genders, classes, and masculine-feminine minds, was made and still is made, possible by those who domesticated your ancestors – and apparently failed to domesticate your line. What do we do? We are sufficiently wealthy to separate and go our own ways, and return to our process of speciation. You may pursue your dysgenic goals, and we will pursue our eugenic goals, and we will rapidly see what occurs to a ‘liberal, feminine, redistributionist, equalitarian’ order without the libertarians and conservatives striving at all times to preserve what they and their ancestors have made, while you do nothing but continue to overpopulate a planet, drive down the averages, and reduce you and yours to yet another failed effeminate equalitarian utopia. You will not however take us down with you. (We would rather …. revolt and end you.) We will continue to rebuild our society from the catastrophe of century of pseudoscience (marx, freud, adorno, cantor, derrida, chomsky et al) and their marxism, postmodernism, neoliberalism, feminism, and denialism – and we will continue to build ours on the centuries of western tradition (aristotle, hume, darwin, menger, and the common law of reciprocity. So that is what noah and I are talking about. Him about finding happiness in the present, and I about how to solve the political problem of your feminine dysgenic animal desire to reverse our evolutionary progress and turn us to state of animals, ignorance, and poverty. So no it is not an act of GSRRM to state what I have stated. It is a scientific description of the cognitive processes and their dysgenic (herd) outcomes that you seek to implement despite knowing very little, thinking very little, and feeling only what an animal feels. Women feel as they do for the simple reason that at maturity their nervous system develops into a shared one so that they are willing to bear any cost to preserve a costly offspring regardless of merit. (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

  • HE ANTI-LIBERAL ARGUMENT (fresh weaponry for your use) Do you know the differenc

    HE ANTI-LIBERAL ARGUMENT
    (fresh weaponry for your use)

    Do you know the difference between virtue, rule, and outcome ethics?

    What about the difference between moral, normative, and outcome law?

    What is the difference between your line of argument(Empathy, Care Taking), Noah Revoy’s line of argument(Psychology, Success), and my line of argument(Law, Limits)?

    What is the genetic, institutional, traditional, normative, and psychological outcome of those three lines of argument?

    We demonstrate approximately six general moral rules (foundations) over the use of capital-in-toto. We demonstrate a bias between specializing in them: consumption (caretaking, proportionality) and dysgenia, production (opportunity, reciprocity) and eugenia, and preservation( disgust/purity, loyalty) and eugenia, while only the preservationists practicing all six equally, the productionists dropping loyalty, and the consumptionism dropping all but care and proportionality.

    These six moral rules roughly are divisible into private and common capital demands in exchange for our cooperation.

    These capital demands and moral demands roughly correspond to the feminine, ascendent male, and established male distributions.

    The structure of the human brain both physical, developmental, hormonal, and neurochemical corresponds to about the same distribution between female, beta male, and dominant male.

    The distribution of mental illness psychotic < solipsistic to < feminine < to > masculine > to autistic > anti-social reflects these brain structures and distributions.

    These developments appear to follow the general rule of 80% genetic and 20% something else (variation in developmental progress).

    (continued…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:09:19 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425569468533065

  • THERE IS GOING TO BE A REVOLUTION – I KNOW. BECAUSE I’M ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO WI

    THERE IS GOING TO BE A REVOLUTION – I KNOW. BECAUSE I’M ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO WILL START IT.

    1. Moral men need a reason for rebellion. (they have it: rule by credit, familicide, genocide, culturecide, civilization. )

    2. They need an institutional solution implementable as law, to demand that resolves their issues, (we have it) and to which they can feel, claim, argue, and fight for, as a moral high ground (they can).

    3. They need a plan of transition to the new institutional system that they can envision bringing to fruition. (we have it)

    4. They need a strategy and a plan of action making use of available means by which to conduct a rebellion that will succeed. (we have it)

    5. They need an opportunity to seize under which the revolution can be visibly successful (we do – no civilization in history has been more fragile)

    6. They need a communication system by which to coordinate their efforts over large territories that are impossible for standard police, emergency, and military to concentrate power against. (we have it).

    7. If possible they need an icon behind which to anthropomorphize their actions (we have it)

    (Some of us have been at this a while)

    Sovereignty. Rule of Natural Judge Discovered, Common Law. Direct Democracy over a Market Commons with Houses for the Classes. Direct redistribution of proceeds from the commons, and liquidity from the treasury to the citizenry. An end to Fiat Credit Capitalism, an end to Politicians, and an end to propaganda, misrepresentation, pseudoscience, and deceit in the informational commons (public discourse). And the creation of opportunities in every state by the decentralization of power, and the devolution of the federal government to regions.

    The American Empire was useful in the conquest of the continent. It was useful in the preservation of the British Empire’s patterns of finance and trade. It was useful in the defeat of world communism. But it is not useful in the defeat of Islamism, nor our own suicidal pseudoscientific secular humanism – it is the sponsor of both in the deep state’s pursuit of customers from both.

    We are going to end the empire. Preserve the military as overwhelmingly powerful domestic rather than overstretched international force. Preserve the systems of insurers of last resort. But eliminate the discretion of the federal government over our daily lives. We are not equal. We do not have equal desires. And both the European imperial and American imperial systems must end. Or like all empires, they will kill the host that made them possible.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 21:44:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424998459531497

  • NFANTILE AUTHORITARIAN ECHO CHAMBERS —“Fascism, racism and anti-semitism are d

    NFANTILE AUTHORITARIAN ECHO CHAMBERS

    —“Fascism, racism and anti-semitism are doing pretty good in my FB feed tbh😆”—Arran Byrnes

    Echo chambers echo precisely because they’re empty.

    Miltants like (R)Fascists and (L)Communists mater because they will take up arms.

    Conservatives, Libertarians, and Centrists matter because the eliminate the need to. (Or at least reduce the body count.)

    I’m a universalist, ethnocentric, nationalist, by Rule of Law under Natural Law, fascist because its the optimum human condition that does not result in hyper-consumption, de-civilization, parasitism, predation, dysgenia, conquest, genocide, and endemic warfare.

    In other words, there is no argument against this form of ‘fascism’ – intolerance for parasitic conquest of others – that is not reducible to lying as a means of engaging in parasitic conquest of others.

    One cannot choose corporation over kinship for others without engaging in genocide. Therefore the only restitution for attempted genocide is the same by reciprocity. Ergo do not engage in such.

    So war is necessary to correct the condition, but once correcting the condition one and one’s people must maintain competitive advantage sufficient to eliminate repetition of conquest by other means.

    That is what I propose … because I am not ‘infantile’, ignorant, and lacking experience with incentives, organization, strategy, logistics, and scale.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:40:37 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424748798008982

  • THE ECONOMICS AND ETHICS OF ENDING DEMOCRACY —“He [Doolittle] understands the

    THE ECONOMICS AND ETHICS OF ENDING DEMOCRACY

    —“He [Doolittle] understands the what, but not the why. People are being dumbed down not because they are forced to, but because they desire to be. We naturally seek the path of least resistance, the easy and uncomplicated.”—Jeni Bolotovski

    (…Aside from the fact that yes, dumbing people down, eradicating their history, traditions, customs, and laws, has been an intentional ambition of the marxist, socialist, postmodernist program….)

    I would frame it differently as we seek the greatest return in the shortest time at the least effort, with the greatest certainty, at the lowest risk.

    (Return, Time, Effort, Certainty, Risk.)

    And that at present the possibility of marginal improvement for marginal increase in knowledge is questionable.

    And the only harm is that it makes democracy impossible, and requires we return to demonstrated proficiency before obtaining influence over others.

    In other words, without incentive to work for the franchise, or to work for membership in consumption (the middle class) then there is no return on reduction of ignorance.

    And I agree. Ergo. Return to demonstrated ability to participate in the franchise (application of violence/force by means of voting).

    We can either educate everyone sufficiently to participate in those decisions that require knowledge of math, science, history, economics, psychology, sociology, and law – or, recognizing the failure our our experiment – we can once again limit participation in decisions to those that demonstrate it by achievement (economically self sufficient intergenerational families free of criminal activities, owners of business (small) and industry(large) who risk personal capital, and territorial governors (cities vs territories), and a decider of last resort (monarchy) who has veto power over all of the above.

    So I agree….

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:37:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424737939020144