Theme: Governance

  • Not so much. Example: Vancouver, Seattle, Portland, San Fran coast is a thin sti

    Not so much. Example: Vancouver, Seattle, Portland, San Fran coast is a thin stip. You have to use districts not counties.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 21:21:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176245213850996736

    Reply addressees: @2theLeff @NateSilver538

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176230403323117569


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176230403323117569

  • That all depends on the next few years – whether we tolerate this or not. I thin

    That all depends on the next few years – whether we tolerate this or not. I think not. People think democracy is irreversible. It’s easily reversible. It’s failed every time anything like it’s been tried. The windfall of the industrial revolution is over and normality returns. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 17:00:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176179602517057537

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176178406922301440


    IN REPLY TO:

    @StefanMolyneux

    Mass migration is an election strategy, because most Third World immigrants vote Left.

    If one party has a “can’t lose” election strategy, and uses the media to destroy the lives of those who oppose that strategy, guess what?

    Soft totalitarianism is

    already

    here.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176178406922301440

  • Trump is remaking the party. The question is whether he will be successful or no

    Trump is remaking the party. The question is whether he will be successful or not. I can’t tell. If he gets another four it’s certain he will. By halfway through his next term the global power balance will complete it’s shift – unfortunately our system doesn’t give us 12 yrs.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 16:47:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176176174583681024

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176165250674155522


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176165250674155522

  • Rule of Law vs Government – Deconflation

    Rule of Law vs Government – Deconflation https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/23/rule-of-law-vs-government-deconflation/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 12:53:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176117372773703681

  • Rule of Law vs Government – Deconflation

    [R]ule of Law is Rule of Law ( prohibitions, via-negativa ) regardless of the form of Government (actions, requirements, via-positiva). The only necessary function of law is the resolution of disputes. The only necessary function of government is the production of commons. In a democracy individuals vote on those commons recommended by whom? A king? A bureaucracy? Any proposed by anyone? In a republic, individuals vote for representatives who then vote on those commons. Dictator/Monarchy, Cabinet, (Representatives) Bureaucracy, People. European Parliaments like thangs and juries were originally juries, where the monarchy would petition local landowners (businesspeople) if they wished to tax them for some purpose or not. The battle over via negativa control Rule of Law vs Rule by DIscretion), and the limits of exception on rule of law vs rule by discretion, and the distribution of via-positiva rule between monarch(nation)/dictator(empire), oligarchy/parliament (intermediary between state and people), and the people, has continued. As far as I know the form of government is dependent upon the demographic distribution of the people (relative sizes of the classes), their state of development (size of the middle classes), scale of territory, and hostility and competitiveness of neighbors. If we want an ideal government – at least, the one possible by man – we probably had it: small homogenous nation states, rule of law by the natural (necessary) law of reciprocity (tort, trespass), an hereditary monarch as judge of last resort, a cabinet of professionals acting largely as venture capitalists, a small professional bureaucracy, preferably trained in the aristocratic (private secular), church or confucian model from youth. Via Negativa voting by the people in matters of taxation. And (what is causing most of our 19th-20thc problems) universal standing before the court in matters of the commons. This creates a political market for commons, a productive market for goods services and information, and a juridical market for prosecution of ir-reciprocity regardless of whether private or public.

  • Rule of Law vs Government – Deconflation

    [R]ule of Law is Rule of Law ( prohibitions, via-negativa ) regardless of the form of Government (actions, requirements, via-positiva). The only necessary function of law is the resolution of disputes. The only necessary function of government is the production of commons. In a democracy individuals vote on those commons recommended by whom? A king? A bureaucracy? Any proposed by anyone? In a republic, individuals vote for representatives who then vote on those commons. Dictator/Monarchy, Cabinet, (Representatives) Bureaucracy, People. European Parliaments like thangs and juries were originally juries, where the monarchy would petition local landowners (businesspeople) if they wished to tax them for some purpose or not. The battle over via negativa control Rule of Law vs Rule by DIscretion), and the limits of exception on rule of law vs rule by discretion, and the distribution of via-positiva rule between monarch(nation)/dictator(empire), oligarchy/parliament (intermediary between state and people), and the people, has continued. As far as I know the form of government is dependent upon the demographic distribution of the people (relative sizes of the classes), their state of development (size of the middle classes), scale of territory, and hostility and competitiveness of neighbors. If we want an ideal government – at least, the one possible by man – we probably had it: small homogenous nation states, rule of law by the natural (necessary) law of reciprocity (tort, trespass), an hereditary monarch as judge of last resort, a cabinet of professionals acting largely as venture capitalists, a small professional bureaucracy, preferably trained in the aristocratic (private secular), church or confucian model from youth. Via Negativa voting by the people in matters of taxation. And (what is causing most of our 19th-20thc problems) universal standing before the court in matters of the commons. This creates a political market for commons, a productive market for goods services and information, and a juridical market for prosecution of ir-reciprocity regardless of whether private or public.

  • RT @MartianHoplite: The Ideal: a balanced tradeoff btw individualism & collectiv

    RT @MartianHoplite: The Ideal: a balanced tradeoff btw individualism & collectivism.

    Libertarianism: always individualism, esp when bad, n…


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 01:03:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175938738196832256

  • That’s not true David. See Obama’s 1.4. Obama undermined the population and the

    That’s not true David. See Obama’s 1.4. Obama undermined the population and the industrial base, and trump is trying to restore the base. It’s not going to happen for free.

    GSRRM is a lie. Every time.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 17:51:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175467565830823936

    Reply addressees: @David_Boaz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175437454880493569


    IN REPLY TO:

    @David_Boaz

    People are saying it’s the greatest deficit ever. Nobody’s ever had a deficit like this. https://t.co/ZcAVHaa7Fh

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175437454880493569

  • Well done. The parliament, the Jury, the Thang, were all invented to assent or d

    Well done. The parliament, the Jury, the Thang, were all invented to assent or dissent to a proposition by the rulers (monarchy).

    Our experiment has been a failure. We return to juries (veto, via-negativa), and abandon our experiment with group rule (via positiva).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 01:02:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175213604649525249

    Reply addressees: @CrumbMontgomery @DuneQuoteBot

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175023250360950784


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175023250360950784

  • The President is Protecting YOU, from US

    The President is Protecting YOU, from US. https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/20/the-president-is-protecting-you-from-us/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:32:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175100485935804417