How to outlaw liberal ‘applecart tipping’?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 16:30:00 UTC
Theme: Governance
-
Well, you’re an in-group member, speaking truthfully, not trying to engage in pa
Well, you’re an in-group member, speaking truthfully, not trying to engage in parasitism, but wanting ‘insurance’ from the rest of us. Now what if you’re an immigrant, you want free money, education, but you don’t want pay by giving up your manners, customs, language, religion?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 14:53:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188831203618627586
Reply addressees: @thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188827621397794827
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188827621397794827
-
I understand completely. Although, we have deal with the reality that the reason
I understand completely. Although, we have deal with the reality that the reason we are talking about this subject is the utility of soft eugenics(one child, no child policy), and not hard eugenics(euthanasia). Hard eugenics breaks reciprocity. Not having soft eugenics does too.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 14:36:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188826856742641665
Reply addressees: @thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188819039105290242
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188819039105290242
-
The context is in discussing the point at which one has the agency to make decis
The context is in discussing the point at which one has the agency to make decisions in a polity. Would you want him lead a polity? Body or soldiers? A family? Make decisions for himself?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 14:02:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188818318116970497
Reply addressees: @thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188817778972733440
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188817778972733440
-
MOVEMENT: INTELLECTUAL > POLITICAL > AESTHETIC —“Which is the better tool to i
MOVEMENT: INTELLECTUAL > POLITICAL > AESTHETIC
—“Which is the better tool to introduce these concepts into academia? Political or intellectual forms? Or is that something you’re willing to… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=494506707812891&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 12:19:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188792374723563520
-
MOVEMENT: INTELLECTUAL > POLITICAL > AESTHETIC —“Which is the better tool to i
MOVEMENT: INTELLECTUAL > POLITICAL > AESTHETIC
—“Which is the better tool to introduce these concepts into academia? Political or intellectual forms? Or is that something you’re willing to allow to naturally occur?”— Jarrod Marma
I think when we develop an aesthetic class it will make its way into academia. A movement needs aesthetic (empathic), political (utilitarian), and intellectual (conceptual-technological (Power)) assets.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 08:19:00 UTC
-
Romantic Love has has little to do with the survival of a marriage such that off
Romantic Love has has little to do with the survival of a marriage such that offspring are produced with sufficient ability not to be a burden on the rest of the polity. It’s a modern luxury. And at present economic necessity has rapidly dissipated, and will continue to do so.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 20:17:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188550304297635843
Reply addressees: @OfSalamis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188549993210306560
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@OfSalamis Throughout history love evolved from mutual care, because of economic utility – it was only the 1300’s during the plague love entered literature, and only in the 1970’s, marriage became a matter exclusively of attraction and friendship. Romantic love is a luxury good.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188549993210306560
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@OfSalamis Throughout history love evolved from mutual care, because of economic utility – it was only the 1300’s during the plague love entered literature, and only in the 1970’s, marriage became a matter exclusively of attraction and friendship. Romantic love is a luxury good.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188549993210306560
-
It’s easier if we take an example you would object to. For example, if you can v
It’s easier if we take an example you would object to.
For example, if you can vote/veto on anything, or vote your economic contribution on anything, or you can vote an equal proportion or proportional division of revenue generation, for anything, then how is that not a market?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 20:08:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188547921308016640
Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188520798455291904
IN REPLY TO:
@directdemocrac7
@curtdoolittle @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays Sorry Curt I can’t see an answer to that question in your tweets.
I’m not sure I can see how an Act of parliament can ever be a contract.
Who are the 2 (or more) parties to the contract?
Govt & People?
If so, how is consent obtained from people?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188520798455291904
-
FROM INTELLECTUAL MOVEMENT TO POLITICAL MOVEMENT John Mark is almost single hand
FROM INTELLECTUAL MOVEMENT TO POLITICAL MOVEMENT
John Mark is almost single handedly transforming Propertarianism from an Intellectual to a Political Movement. … And it’s working.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 18:14:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188519437865017346
-
Brits need to get over the monarchy thing because the monarchy (judge of last re
Brits need to get over the monarchy thing because the monarchy (judge of last resort, the military), a house of lords (defense of heritage, tradition, and way of life), a house of commons (business), and church (house of the family) is the optimum government under rule of law.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 18:03:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188516553798701056
Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188516155390074882
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays … began the long march from the restoration of the law from monarchical usurpation, to the reconstruction of usurpation under ‘democratic’ governments, and our present attempt at restoration of the law (market for suppression of parasitism) from democratic governments.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188516155390074882
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays … began the long march from the restoration of the law from monarchical usurpation, to the reconstruction of usurpation under ‘democratic’ governments, and our present attempt at restoration of the law (market for suppression of parasitism) from democratic governments.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188516155390074882