Theme: Governance

  • CONVENIENT CLASSIFICATIONS by James Dmitro Makienko If 4GW is done by state acto

    CONVENIENT CLASSIFICATIONS

    by James Dmitro Makienko

    If 4GW is done by state actors it’s called “hybrid war”

    If 4GW is done by non-state actors it’s called “terrorism”

    Same violence.

    Different benefactors


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-06 15:59:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTANDING A little frustrated with the conservative vox populi. The liberals

    UNDERSTANDING

    A little frustrated with the conservative vox populi. The liberals think you are evil for requiring meritocracy, and you think they have your agency. You’re both wrong. If you think people know what they’re doing then you tend to hate them. If you think all but a few of us are gene-machines and barely domesticated animals following genetic, traditional, cultural, and institutional programming, you just hate the programming that enables the irreciprocal bias in genes. I say this all the time but (a) I am pretty certain even those of us with cognitive agency are gene machines, (b) people have no idea what they’re doing, they’re just poorly trained animals,( c) that those of us with agency must create institutions, education, and rules (laws) to train and constrain the barely domesticated animals from falsehood an irrecirocity – even if it is against their will, and even if it requires force. (d) So I don’t hate people, (e) and I realize that words do not work when depriving people of their parasitism, rent seeking, and free riding, so (f) the poorly trained animals need those of us with agency to ‘do what we must’ to design, create, and enforce institutions, positive education, and negative rules (laws) that constrain them to truth, reciprocity, and therefore cooperation via exchange, and as a consequence the limiting of reproduction to self sufficiency – largely of the underclasses.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-06 15:32:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTANDING A little frustrated with the conservative vox populi. The liberals

    UNDERSTANDING

    A little frustrated with the conservative vox populi. The liberals think you are evil for requiring meritocracy, and you think they have your agency. You’re both wrong. If you think people know what they’re doing then you tend to hate them. If you think all but a few of us are gene-machines and barely domesticated animals following genetic, traditional, cultural, and institutional programming, then you just hate the programming that enables the irreciprocal bias in genes and not people. I say this all the time but (a) I am pretty certain even those of us with cognitive agency are also gene machines, (b) people have no idea what they’re doing, they’re just poorly trained animals,( c) that those of us with agency must create institutions, education, and rules (laws) to train and constrain the barely domesticated animals from falsehood an irrecirocity – even if it is against their will, and even if it requires force. (d) So I don’t hate people, (e) and I realize that words do not work when depriving people of their parasitism, rent seeking, and free riding, so (f) the poorly trained animals need those of us with agency to ‘do what we must’ to design, create, and enforce institutions, positive education, and negative rules (laws) that constrain them to truth, reciprocity, and therefore cooperation via exchange, and as a consequence the limiting of reproduction to self sufficiency – largely of the underclasses.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-06 15:31:00 UTC

  • OVERPLAYING THEIR HAND by Alexander Brown (OMG Alexander Brown is back!! ) Two t

    OVERPLAYING THEIR HAND

    by Alexander Brown

    (OMG Alexander Brown is back!! )

    Two things are clear to me over Qassem. Major General Qassem Soleimani served his master Khomenie, was loyal, did some very disgusting things while at it, and overplayed his hand with regards to the Trump administration. For all that violations against foreign powers ( mainly the United States and regional allies Israel + Saudi Arabia ), Qassem deserved to die and was duly marked for death. The when, why, and how that execution, was simply a matter of time. So that, his miscalculation over US territory in Iraq while spearheading Iranian foreign policy in same country, spelt his doom as would be expected by watchers of these events. He was foolish to not realise that he could have been FOUND, FIXED and FINISHED so accurately, there need to be no soldier on the ground to do it directly. Question is, in reciprocity, could Iran do same to ANY US/Israeli/Saudi general? Why not?

    Capability issues? Operational challenges? Dreading the cyclical retaliation?

    Two. The Iranian regime as it is today, is not necessarily serving the interest of Iran; the Iranian people; the region; and is not acting as a respectful member of the existing international structure, systems, and or order. It may be argued that the existing world architecture is in itself distasteful, and require reform +/- an overthrow amd replacement. But if this provides the standard to which all including the US are being held to, WHY must Iran continue to be the rogue under such an establisment and not be expected to be retaliated against or held responsible for its actions that violate existing norms, rules, laws?

    Attacking the US Mission in Iraq was stupid, regardless of whether it was done indirectly by proxies or not. It was to be retaliated against in proportion or more for the DETERRENCE value and to eliminate the significant chest piece ( Qassem ) who was also such a powerful regional security figure. Such a personage should not be anti American interest. And IF or as he were, he deserved what came to him in the scheme of things. Post his death, the response from Tehran is even revealing.

    Supreme leader Ayatollah A. Khamenie is at his abusive best, ‘singling’ out Trump for invectives while threatening US interests and assets in the Strait of Hormuz. And, he would not hesitate to violate the already defective and paralyzed JCPOA that favoured Iran to the exclusion of its regional rivals, and global security interests. In another miscalculation, he announced a withdrawal from the agreement. What does that say about the Iranian leadership?

    It may not be suicidal, but it isnt that very smart.

    Khamenie could be fixed any day by US drones. And so could his replacement for Qassem, the brigadier general Ghaani. Any wise actor then would recognise this reality and approach this whole situation or challenge, rather differently. But to pacify the Iranian street, Khamenie went even more lunatic. While at it, he claimed “death to America” is for the US leadership, and NOT Americans. And insists that Qassem would be avenged. Is this actor, a fellow we should cry for?

    Gaddafi was delusional as well. When he had lucid moments, he made the fatal error of trusting rats like Tony Blair, Sarkozy and Obama and paid dearly for it with his goddamed life after some hard sodomy without lubrication. Saddam was foolish too. He played to the Iraqi street to his ignominious hanging. Can Khamenie NOT learn from those and from Qassem?

    If he would not, why cry for him and keep scrutiny of the unhinged US killing machine?

    Thing is that, Israel rules via Trump in that region. Israel want this regime in Iran gone for a leadership favorable to interests in Jerusalem / Tel Aviv. This ayatollah and Qassem should have known this and act better, than to keep pushing the shia crescent agenda to Israeli doorsteps while violating US sovereignty and in such an ineffective way, that they risk leadership DECAPITATION and military humiliation!

    Any way. The 42% or so Persians may be waiting to to help form a new Government in Tehran, post the Azerbaijani Khamenie. Khamenie’s legacy is aboit being obliterated because he miscalculated multiply, just as Qassem just did to his untimely death!


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 17:40:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81849894_179172566814238_43690627875

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81849894_179172566814238_4369062787595370496_o_179172563480905.jpg Yes I am in favor of this war – for purely strategic reasons. And no I’m not wrong. It is to our advantage in every way possible – and very likely to Iran’s as well.

    Yeah, sorry. I think things thru.

    Iran has lots of ballistic missiles, conducts war through proxies (terrorist militias), has access to the saudi fields via the south, and the ability to disrupt world oil prices in the gulf. Wants to take over Iraq and Syria and have access to both gulf and Mediterranean. From their they will take the Saudis and the princedoms if the Turks, Saudis, Egyptians and Israelis don’t resist them. So they will have a corridor from the mediterranean to the Caucuses to Afghanistan and the indian ocean.

    However, Iran has an antiquated military. And we are far beyond their ability to project power.

    And you’re missing the point that global peace is no longer in our domestic interests either strategically or economically.

    I hate quoting fiction other than the occasional Herbert, but “Chaos is a Ladder” of opportunity.

    We want chaos this year and as much of it as possible.

    Revolution comes.



    Legend:

    99th = World Military Rank

    Country Name

    Population / GDPYes I am in favor of this war – for purely strategic reasons. And no I’m not wrong. It is to our advantage in every way possible – and very likely to Iran’s as well.

    Yeah, sorry. I think things thru.

    Iran has lots of ballistic missiles, conducts war through proxies (terrorist militias), has access to the saudi fields via the south, and the ability to disrupt world oil prices in the gulf. Wants to take over Iraq and Syria and have access to both gulf and Mediterranean. From their they will take the Saudis and the princedoms if the Turks, Saudis, Egyptians and Israelis don’t resist them. So they will have a corridor from the mediterranean to the Caucuses to Afghanistan and the indian ocean.

    However, Iran has an antiquated military. And we are far beyond their ability to project power.

    And you’re missing the point that global peace is no longer in our domestic interests either strategically or economically.

    I hate quoting fiction other than the occasional Herbert, but “Chaos is a Ladder” of opportunity.

    We want chaos this year and as much of it as possible.

    Revolution comes.



    Legend:

    99th = World Military Rank

    Country Name

    Population / GDP


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 16:54:00 UTC

  • I DUNNO. NETANYAHU? Charges appear political to me, not criminal. In other words

    I DUNNO. NETANYAHU?

    Charges appear political to me, not criminal. In other words they’re within the limits access buying, but there isn’t any evidence of quid pro quo.

    Same with Trump really.

    Compare with Obama giving 150M to a publisher for writing up the education standards, and getting 50M for his book rights from the same publisher on exit.

    That’s quid pro quo.

    The semblance of, or possibility of influence (corruption) is not the same as the demonstrated evidence of direct or indirect quid pro quo.

    Obama shouldn’t have used that publisher. That was quid pro quo. I haven’t seen a single instance of anything of that nature with Trump or Netanyahu.

    So the left uses a double standard benefitting their members but not applying the same standard to the opposition’s members.

    This double standard within a group is a crime under P-Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 10:44:00 UTC

  • MARKETS NOT MAJORITARIANISM by Martin Štěpán Why do people keep assuming we only

    MARKETS NOT MAJORITARIANISM

    by Martin Štěpán

    Why do people keep assuming we only want to make slight changes to universal suffrage? The optimum outcome is scraping the whole thing and putting in several houses for classes with different interests that have to negotiate.

    They have been indoctrinated into the fallacy of the good of democracy’s majoritarian tyranny, and made ignorant of the market as a means of calculating optimums despite differences.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-04 12:07:00 UTC

  • “confusing friend and enemy -the current state of the dissident right”—Thorin

    —“confusing friend and enemy -the current state of the dissident right”—Thorin Moriaz

    There is nothing new about factions on any side, it’s just that the masculine resistance to verbal cooperation (disagreeableness) is higher than the feminine, but the feminine resistance to physical cooperation is higher than the masculine.

    We don’t need to agree on words, we only need to agree to fight.

    We are men. 😉

    At least those who will fight are men. 😉 lol


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-03 12:42:00 UTC

  • Dec 31, 2019, 11:25 PM

    https://www.studyfinds.org/beauty-on-the-ballot-candidates-attractiveness-plays-role-in-voters-decisions-especially-in-u-s/https://www.studyfinds.org/beauty-on-the-ballot-candidates-attractiveness-plays-role-in-voters-decisions-especially-in-u-s/Updated Dec 31, 2019, 11:25 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 23:25:00 UTC

  • Not until it’s time. The value of our side’s understanding in advance is far les

    Not until it’s time. The value of our side’s understanding in advance is far less than the harm of the other side’s preparation in advance.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 22:19:00 UTC