The reasons SJWs infect organizations are (a) that we don’t separate via-positiva devotional organizations, from via-negativa enforcement organizations, (b) we don’t ALWAYS structure either form of organization as empirical technocracy – all successful bureaucracies are indepdendent and are independent because they’re purely empirical and technocratic. The moment they become sentimental or redistributive they fail.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 21:55:00 UTC
—“Do you think there should be special benefits and statuses to those who actually boog? When I showed up to the Richmond rally I had no idea it was supposed to be peaceful. What stopped me was the radio news saying that ,the rally was supposed peaceful and that was the intention ,to show that a demonstration with weapons could happen without violence, blah blah blah peaceful discussion. I believe that at this point with the left doubling down with its oppressive measures, the objective now should be to instigate and reward action or am I tripping.”—Tyler Granberry
I have addressed this issue thoroughly and you will be blown away by it – and yes it is one of the reasons I say ‘produce the incentives and people will follow them”.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 20:59:00 UTC
ACTION PLAN
by Scott De Warren
Trump voters have taken over the Republican Party and made it a party of economic nationalism. There’s no reason why we can’t provide the intellectual firepower to help this already successful political movement expand its power and reach and correct its blindspots as we push the Overton window wide open 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 19:34:00 UTC
We make many decisions every day that can be biased for or against the group interest regardless of cost to us.
Likewise hostile groups within a polity can bias their decisions against the host people’s interests.
This is how social warfare is conducted: undermining.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 12:56:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220691836341301249
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220365382441226241
IN REPLY TO:
@DegenRolf
Robin Dunbar argues that religion evolved to allow humans to live together in previously unknown large-scale communities without killing each other. https://t.co/gyUNYBdBxr https://t.co/lWSgDVdT1Q
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220365382441226241
YES WE WILL START A POLITICAL PARTY
The only purpose of a political party is promotion and legitimacy the same way the IRA had a political party (Sinn Fein). It’s not because a political party can win elections. It’s because it’s a vehicle for recruiting within a non-military framework, and promoting policy. Via positiva politics, via negativa war.
(Tom Kawczynski)
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 10:50:00 UTC
“A WELL REGULATED MILITIA”
Well regulated meant ‘trained where that training is paid for by the state’. The discussion at the time was that given the vastness of the territory, the sparsity of the population, and the limited funds, that they could not at the time afford to pay for it, and that men might not show up given the cost of travel to staging areas, and that they would need to wait until such training was affordable, and therefore they must trust that the men will do it themselves (which they largely did).
The english did this with the longbow in that every sunday after church boys were required (and did) spend three hours shooting the bow. This what (like the Russians are doing) we need to restore again – schools or churches or town halls where men practice regularly at the local level. By the regimental period the regiments were paid for and self sustaining in England. And this is my suggestion going forward – restoration of the regiments and the fraternal order that comes from them.
(My suspicion is that we can reform religion and civil society by working through the regiments as much as through school systems.)
The purpose of a trained militia is to (a) prevent the need of a standing army because (b) standing armies had been used to oppress the people. So, in keeping with european tradition a small number of professional warriors (the aristocracy) would command a large number of unprofessional riflemen (soldiers, footsoldiers). Which would balance the power between the people and the state ensuring that the state didn’t get out of hand, and insuring that the men were invested in the sense of control of their government.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 10:32:00 UTC
So it’s not the standing army that is the problem so much as the lack of a standing militia and a standing army of professional warriors.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 15:58:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220375334232772611
Reply addressees: @HliosX @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220370484979695617
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220370484979695617
A class of professional warriors, a militia of trained citizens, a technical bureaucracy to manage logistics and supplies.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 15:57:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220375097606836224
Reply addressees: @HliosX @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220370484979695617
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220370484979695617
4) There is no evidence anywhere of a militia able to resist an army without a class of professional warriors. For all intents and purposes militia (footmen) produce a picket around which cavalry (maneuver) seeks to exploit opportunities.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 15:56:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220374806345940994
Reply addressees: @HliosX @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220374352870486017
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@HliosX @Ozpin_88 3) Our irregulars raiding, the muslim raiders, the mongol raiders,are effective against organized european militaries. But organized european militaries with prof. warriors seizing initiative to exploit opportunities regardless of plan are what defeat non-european militaries.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1220374352870486017
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@HliosX @Ozpin_88 3) Our irregulars raiding, the muslim raiders, the mongol raiders,are effective against organized european militaries. But organized european militaries with prof. warriors seizing initiative to exploit opportunities regardless of plan are what defeat non-european militaries.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1220374352870486017
So your entire premise of voluntaryism is simply (a) contrary to all evidence in all cultures in all history (b) inherited from the late medieval town hall where all decisions were local. The solution is to return priority to the locality under rule of law, instead of federal.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 15:10:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220363290611736576
Reply addressees: @HliosX @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220352940042530818
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220352940042530818