Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • POWERS OF THE BRITISH MONARCHY (as of 2003) (via a friend) Summary. If the queen

    POWERS OF THE BRITISH MONARCHY

    (as of 2003) (via a friend)

    Summary. If the queen has the loyalty of the armed forces she can do anything she wishes. The only practical means of her action is in crisis, if the government fails.

    The Monarch is Sovereign

    People are her subjects (family, wards)

    Above the law and immune from prosecution

    Diplomatic immunity anywhere on earth

    Exempt from FOI requests

    No passport nor driving license

    No taxes

    Commander in chief of all armed forces, who are sworn to her, not the state

    The making of treaties

    Declaration of war

    Deployment of armed forces overseas

    Recognition of foreign states

    Accreditation and reception of diplomats

    Appointment of Queen’s Counsel (Cabinet)

    The appointment and regulation of the civil service

    The appointment and dismissal of ministers, including the prime minister.

    The summoning, prorogation and dissolution of Parliament

    Royal assent to bills (or veto)

    Consent before any law that affects the monarchy can be even discussed.

    BUT!!! …. Cannot create law, only assent or veto – this is the cornerstone.

    (And can bring in the army if she wants to enforce it)

    Issue and revoke passports

    Arrest, seize, anything commander anything at will

    Administer punishments at will prerogative to keep the peace

    Creation of corporations by Charter

    Granting honours

    Prerogative of mercy

    Even over their souls – head of the church.

    Only revolution can replace her.

    Which is how it should be.

    Devoted to public service

    Limits her opinions to saying nothing

    Specializes in ‘soft power’.

    Most powerful woman in the world.

    The commissioning of officers in the armed forces

    Directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 16:15:00 UTC

  • So that they are accountable for their party actions; for the commitments they m

    So that they are accountable for their party actions; for the commitments they made; liable for the constitutionality of legislation and regulation they sign; and for their display word and deed. That’s accountability.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 15:53:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224360173420056577

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224360172254105602

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Democratic representatives are not accountable in any measurable way other than to throw out the entire party via cyclical dissatisfied with status quo. P-Law constrains them to truthful reciprocal constitutional speech, requires stated terms, subjects them to legal prosecution.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224360172254105602

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    Democratic representatives are not accountable in any measurable way other than to throw out the entire party via cyclical dissatisfied with status quo. P-Law constrains them to truthful reciprocal constitutional speech, requires stated terms, subjects them to legal prosecution.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224360172254105602

  • My principle interest in the president is that he obtain a second term and in do

    My principle interest in the president is that he obtain a second term and in doing so drive the left over the edge into revolt – thus eliminating our need to kick off the revolution(reformation). Otherwise, to take advantage of this opportunity (chaos) to begin ourselves.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 15:48:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224359105810370560

    Reply addressees: @StirnerZacc @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224358599272607747

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @StirnerZacc @realDonaldTrump Trump is trying to govern and leave a legacy of transitioning the USA from postwar subsidizer at middle class expense, to 21st century self interest, for for the benefit of the middle class – fighting the deep state through attrition warfare. He lacks the congress to reform it.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224358599272607747

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @StirnerZacc @realDonaldTrump Trump is trying to govern and leave a legacy of transitioning the USA from postwar subsidizer at middle class expense, to 21st century self interest, for for the benefit of the middle class – fighting the deep state through attrition warfare. He lacks the congress to reform it.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224358599272607747

  • NO??? OPEN ..Liberal Conservatives (Libcons) ………Normie-cons …………..

    NO???

    OPEN
    ..Liberal Conservatives (Libcons)
    ………Normie-cons
    …………..CivNats
    ………………..Libertarians
    ……………………..Alt-R-Cons (DOMINANCE)
    ………………..NeoCons
    ……………Constitution-cons
    ………Trad(family)-cons
    .Jesus-cons
    CLOSED

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 14:50:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224344309408903169

  • DEMOCRACY DOES NOT PRODUCE ACCOUNTABILITY Democratic representatives are not acc

    DEMOCRACY DOES NOT PRODUCE ACCOUNTABILITY

    Democratic representatives are not accountable in any measurable way other than to throw out the entire party via cyclical dissatisfied with status quo.

    P-Law constrains them to truthful reciprocal constitutional speech, requires stated terms, subjects them to legal prosecution.

    So that they are accountable for their party actions; for the commitments they made; liable for the constitutionality of legislation and regulation they sign; and for their display word and deed.

    That’s accountability.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 13:36:00 UTC

  • THE CONSERVATIVE WANT OF CONTROL VS PROGRESSIVE WANT OF A HERD You are conservat

    THE CONSERVATIVE WANT OF CONTROL VS PROGRESSIVE WANT OF A HERD

    You are conservatives. You want to be in control. I understand. But there is only one kind of control you can have that is meaningful rather than purely psychological. And that is to be fit, armed, with food stored for your family, and ready to show up when and if the opportunity arises. Everything else you will collect along the way. And you will go home with ‘earnings’ so to speak, like our ancestors. … If you are incapable of this then say so. But you will not obtain control over anything if you run. You will just be delaying your destruction. Because you will deprive us of one more body we need to win. And we will curse you for it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 13:11:00 UTC

  • RT @ForeignPolicy: Northern Ireland’s culture war has added a cultural dimension

    RT @ForeignPolicy: Northern Ireland’s culture war has added a cultural dimension to the Brexit negotiations.
    https://buff.ly/36NOCgW

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 12:54:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224315218223910912

  • Trump uses the left’s weapon of outrage against them. He’s a master of it. And h

    Trump uses the left’s weapon of outrage against them. He’s a master of it. And he controls the dialog by it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 12:53:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224314857916334080

    Reply addressees: @RedState @streiffredstate

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224313336872960000

    IN REPLY TO:

    @RedState

    Donald Trump’s Dig at Bloomberg Send Him Into a Rage and CNN Helpfully Fact Checks the Episode @streiffredstate https://t.co/C8cOY3iEgf

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224313336872960000

  • ORGANIZING FOR THE FUTURE “POLITICAL ACTION” Just go to propertarianism dot com

    ORGANIZING FOR THE FUTURE “POLITICAL ACTION”

    Just go to propertarianism dot com and sign up with an email address. You don’t have to register with an account. If we have your email address, when we start organizing the guys can reach you.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 12:29:00 UTC

  • “if we can get even just a few thousand to move their we can elect our own peopl

    —“if we can get even just a few thousand to move their we can elect our own people basically creating our own union”—

    Never works. Libertarian Fantasy.

    They will come for you like a disease overwhelming healthy cells.

    You must capture an economy.

    To capture an economy requires you capture a market.

    To capture a market requires you capture a city.

    To capture a city requires conquest, raiding, sieging depending upon numbers speed and external risk.

    There is no libertarian fantasy.

    You cannot run

    You cannot hide

    They are the plague.

    They have islam’s numbers

    They have islam’s strategy: exhaust.

    The only thing you can do is show up and fight.

    Plan for action not for retreat.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 12:12:00 UTC