Theme: Governance

  • P EMPHASIZES THE COURT (effective) NOT VOTING (ineffective)

    Feb 11, 2020, 9:11 PM by John Mark [I]n any nation there will be capable and incapable people, wealthy and poor, etc – all across the spectrum. There is a huge difference between giving less capable people (who often tend to vote for free stuff stolen from others) “via-negativa” power thru P-law (the power to STOP violations of reciprocity) and giving them “via-positiva” power thru voting (the power to INITIATE violations of reciprocity). The Propertarian system does NOT allow less capable (often parasite-minded) people the ability to INITIATE violations of reciprocity, and at the same time it DOES allow everyone to stop violations of reciprocity. So you can see it solves 2 problems at once: It TAKES AWAY via-positiva initiating power from a demographic that has a majority of parasite-instinct people, and GIVES via-negativa power to STOP violations of reciprocity, to everyone. And under P-Law the average person WILL have MUCH more power to counter the well-heeled than today. First, keep in mind that poor people even today often have no trouble getting legal representation when the lawyers believe there is strong chance of a big financial reward. P-Law would provide significant $ rewards – violators of reciprocity will have to pay damages, and the richer the violator, the greater the financial reward for taking them to court will be in many cases. Second, under P-Law there will be very few if any frivolous lawsuits because loser has to pay extra damages. This reduces/eliminates the ability of rich people to use their wealth to “play the lawsuit game” as a tool of control over the poor. Everyone regardless of wealth level will be much more careful about their actions and words in general (so as not to end up in court by violating reciprocity), and careful about going to court (poor people if they have a good case will have no trouble finding a good lawyer, rich people will not be able to use frivolous lawsuits to intimidate & wear out opposition). (Curt has thought this through very thoroughly. People just need to stick around long enough to find out that the multiple changes outlined in the propertarian system fix multiple problems as well as they can be fixed, keeping in mind that no fix will be 100% perfect.)


    —“The importance of voting is evidence the American experiment failed. The greater the importance, the greater the evidence, the greater the failure.”— Luke Weinhagen

  • P EMPHASIZES THE COURT (effective) NOT VOTING (ineffective)

    Feb 11, 2020, 9:11 PM by John Mark [I]n any nation there will be capable and incapable people, wealthy and poor, etc – all across the spectrum. There is a huge difference between giving less capable people (who often tend to vote for free stuff stolen from others) “via-negativa” power thru P-law (the power to STOP violations of reciprocity) and giving them “via-positiva” power thru voting (the power to INITIATE violations of reciprocity). The Propertarian system does NOT allow less capable (often parasite-minded) people the ability to INITIATE violations of reciprocity, and at the same time it DOES allow everyone to stop violations of reciprocity. So you can see it solves 2 problems at once: It TAKES AWAY via-positiva initiating power from a demographic that has a majority of parasite-instinct people, and GIVES via-negativa power to STOP violations of reciprocity, to everyone. And under P-Law the average person WILL have MUCH more power to counter the well-heeled than today. First, keep in mind that poor people even today often have no trouble getting legal representation when the lawyers believe there is strong chance of a big financial reward. P-Law would provide significant $ rewards – violators of reciprocity will have to pay damages, and the richer the violator, the greater the financial reward for taking them to court will be in many cases. Second, under P-Law there will be very few if any frivolous lawsuits because loser has to pay extra damages. This reduces/eliminates the ability of rich people to use their wealth to “play the lawsuit game” as a tool of control over the poor. Everyone regardless of wealth level will be much more careful about their actions and words in general (so as not to end up in court by violating reciprocity), and careful about going to court (poor people if they have a good case will have no trouble finding a good lawyer, rich people will not be able to use frivolous lawsuits to intimidate & wear out opposition). (Curt has thought this through very thoroughly. People just need to stick around long enough to find out that the multiple changes outlined in the propertarian system fix multiple problems as well as they can be fixed, keeping in mind that no fix will be 100% perfect.)


    —“The importance of voting is evidence the American experiment failed. The greater the importance, the greater the evidence, the greater the failure.”— Luke Weinhagen

  • “it’s Hard to Get on Board with Monarchy”

    Feb 12, 2020, 9:53 AM “IT’S HARD TO GET ON BOARD WITH MONARCHY” [I] wasn’t on board with it either. It’s just eventually I couldn’t deny it any longer. Constitutional monarchy with power of veto, termination of ministers, dissolution of parliament. That’s all. Monarchy = Kinship government, and Intergenerational Incentives, and capitalization rather than tragedy of the commons, and compensates for fashion, political, and procedural failure. The enemy wanted to end our monarchy to replace it with an organized crime family.

  • “it’s Hard to Get on Board with Monarchy”

    Feb 12, 2020, 9:53 AM “IT’S HARD TO GET ON BOARD WITH MONARCHY” [I] wasn’t on board with it either. It’s just eventually I couldn’t deny it any longer. Constitutional monarchy with power of veto, termination of ministers, dissolution of parliament. That’s all. Monarchy = Kinship government, and Intergenerational Incentives, and capitalization rather than tragedy of the commons, and compensates for fashion, political, and procedural failure. The enemy wanted to end our monarchy to replace it with an organized crime family.

  • You Have Many Choices. We Have One. so Leave

    You Have Many Choices. We Have One. so Leave https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/you-have-many-choices-we-have-one-so-leave/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:48:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228345329868820482

  • You Have Many Choices. We Have One. so Leave

    Feb 12, 2020, 12:14 PM [I]f you want socialism, and open borders, then leave – open borders work both ways. And you have a whole world offering socialism that is willing to take you. Canada alone wants 100M people in this century and there are as many as 100M of you that want Canadian Socialism. But If you want western civilization, and in particular anglo American high trust institutions, and the proceeds from them, then there is only one country left to get them. And we are going to keep it that country and those institutions, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you – including the greatest cost.

  • You Have Many Choices. We Have One. so Leave

    Feb 12, 2020, 12:14 PM [I]f you want socialism, and open borders, then leave – open borders work both ways. And you have a whole world offering socialism that is willing to take you. Canada alone wants 100M people in this century and there are as many as 100M of you that want Canadian Socialism. But If you want western civilization, and in particular anglo American high trust institutions, and the proceeds from them, then there is only one country left to get them. And we are going to keep it that country and those institutions, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you – including the greatest cost.

  • Again, Ethnocentric Small States

    Again, Ethnocentric Small States

    Again, Ethnocentric Small States https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/again-ethnocentric-small-states/ https://t.co/DqsasUnOTb


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:30:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228340766461743104

  • Again, Ethnocentric Small States

    Again, Ethnocentric Small States

    [I] hadn’t seen this yet but thank you – because that’s exactly the test, the scope of test, and the clarity of findings an accessibility we need. Again, ethnocentric, small state, low power distance, rule of law of reciprocity, truth-telling, markets in everything. @Ozpin_88′ I hadn’t seen this yet but thank you – because that’s exactly the test, the scope of test, and the clarity of findings an accessibility we need. Again, ethnocentric, small state, low power distance, rule of law of reciprocity, truth-telling, markets in everything. @Ozpin_88

    85050358_206444444087050_7275509518061010944_n.jpg
  • Again, Ethnocentric Small States

    Again, Ethnocentric Small States

    [I] hadn’t seen this yet but thank you – because that’s exactly the test, the scope of test, and the clarity of findings an accessibility we need. Again, ethnocentric, small state, low power distance, rule of law of reciprocity, truth-telling, markets in everything. @Ozpin_88′ I hadn’t seen this yet but thank you – because that’s exactly the test, the scope of test, and the clarity of findings an accessibility we need. Again, ethnocentric, small state, low power distance, rule of law of reciprocity, truth-telling, markets in everything. @Ozpin_88

    85050358_206444444087050_7275509518061010944_n.jpg