Theme: Governance

  • “We see a very different middle east emerging. Dubai is like Singapore. Al Qaeda

    —“We see a very different middle east emerging. Dubai is like Singapore. Al Qaeda Failed. They failed to overthrow any government. Every government that didn’t play their game emerged successful. … The saudis did and were weakened.”— George Friedman


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-29 17:36:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233808167231983616

  • Please suggest to USA: exchange ‘control’ of Turkey and possible restoration of

    Please suggest to USA: exchange ‘control’ of Turkey and possible restoration of orthodoxy for ending european and american sanctions.
    @KremlinRussia_E


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-29 17:29:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233806540836044800

  • THERE HAS BEEN NO BATTLE OF IDEAS There has been massive immigration into left l

    THERE HAS BEEN NO BATTLE OF IDEAS
    There has been massive immigration into left leaning cities, that have dragged the majority middle class federation of nation states into majority lower class demand for authoritarian monopoly.

    Big Lies: Marxist, Postmodern, Feminist, HBD-Denial


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-29 15:15:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233772827809132549

    Reply addressees: @TheEconomist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233716919779364865

  • One cannot legislate unbelief(thought) One cannot legislate belief(thought) One

    One cannot legislate unbelief(thought)
    One cannot legislate belief(thought)
    One can legislate public speech(display, word, and deed)
    One can legislate proselytizing(sale and distribution)
    One can legislate against organized crime (undermining, social construction, addiction)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 22:56:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233526492556034049

    Reply addressees: @Ozpin_88 @WillReturns1066 @Nationalist7346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233523623811518465

  • “Christians. Really, just take the reigns and rule already. I really don’t care

    –“Christians. Really, just take the reigns and rule already. I really don’t care how you do it if you’re trying. But you don’t seem to want to. So stop begging others to do it for you in the manner more to your liking without contributing to rule.”— Ospin88

    This is my underlying complaint about christians. I don’t believe them. All I see are women whining so that men will protect them.

    There was a reason it took the viking invasion and viking warriors to conduct the crusades. There was a reason the french couldn’t resist them.

    Christianity has only been strong when it wailing women handkerchief that inspires and licenses aryanism (heroic, expansionist, entrepreneurial, militarism).

    I am not the only person to say that christianity is a means of keeping the peasants pliable and working so that the aristocracy can afford expensive weaponry. Or that the only time christian banners fly is to legitimize aryanism.

    I mean, what separates a christian monarchy from a kingdom? The license of the church to use violence.

    If christianity s strong then christian men would be the first in line rather than constitutionalists and pagans, while docile christians show up and wave flags when the hard work is done.

    Give me a pope who defense europen civilization not the faith. Christianity is a third world religion.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 18:01:00 UTC

  • I don’t seek approval. I write law. Either you will fight for your people, or yo

    I don’t seek approval. I write law.
    Either you will fight for your people, or you will not.
    If you will not, you do not matter.
    If you will fight for your people, your faith does not matter.
    If you choose your faith over your people, then you are the enemy of your people.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 21:14:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233138446526558209

    Reply addressees: @WillReturns1066

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233134553457291264

  • How Propertarians Have an Impact

    [T]he biggest impact all of us seem to have is:

    (a) share posts and tweets,

    (b) to make short video about our solutions – not methodology

    (c) to make short videos how some one of our policies solves a problem for both right and left, and

    (d) we need to spend this year starting a political party. We need to appeal to both sides as finding a peaceful resolution. The purpose of civil war position is to remind both sides that the unthinkable is thinkable, and possible – that’s why we need to take positive action to resolve differences.

  • How Propertarians Have an Impact

    [T]he biggest impact all of us seem to have is:

    (a) share posts and tweets,

    (b) to make short video about our solutions – not methodology

    (c) to make short videos how some one of our policies solves a problem for both right and left, and

    (d) we need to spend this year starting a political party. We need to appeal to both sides as finding a peaceful resolution. The purpose of civil war position is to remind both sides that the unthinkable is thinkable, and possible – that’s why we need to take positive action to resolve differences.

  • Ugh. What’s P-Law on Taboo Subjects in Public Speech?

    Ugh. What’s P-Law on Taboo Subjects in Public Speech? https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/27/ugh-whats-p-law-on-taboo-subjects-in-public-speech-2/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 14:11:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233031960886489091

  • Ugh. What’s P-Law on Taboo Subjects in Public Speech?

    —“How would holocaust denial be dealt with under P-law?”– A Friend

    How would any public speech be dealt with under P-law? In public, to the public, in matters public, suppression of the truth, or attempts at discovering the truth are prohibited under P-law. Conversely, falsehood is prohibited under P. The difference is that under P-law, speech in public, to the public, in matters public, is involuntarily warrantied. Including the dishonest use of statements masquerading as questions. So, public trial by propaganda, sophistry, and falsehood is illegal and expensive for any party since the cost of correcting public speech is prohibitively expensive. As such one can investigate, and report findings, like we do in any science, but we cannot make claims or imply claims without liability for error, bias, and deceit. Personally I’m far less concerned about this subject than I am the destruction and death by marxism, bolshevism, Leninism, maoism; the current civilizational destruction under postmodernism and denialism; and the ancient world’s destruction by judaism, Christianity and especially the billion dead under islam. So, sure, I tend to think the holocaust industry has gotten out of hand but I don’t know truth from falsehood myself, and I think it would be useful to discover what’s true and what’s false in order to stop both sides from propagandizing. I hate this topic. I try to avoid it at all costs. But I do my job. My job is to answer the tough questions. That’s what y’all pay me for with those donations.