Theme: Governance

  • THAT’S OUR UNITY WITH P by Jay AmeriSor P is actually very inclusive with the ke

    THAT’S OUR UNITY WITH P

    by Jay AmeriSor

    P is actually very inclusive with the key being is that whoever participants from the different camps/tribes/clans they must be disciplined to follow P bylaws. You can be multiethnic, multi-religious, and variances of gifts/talents. Meaning stay within your in-group “clubs, cults, gossip circles” when expressing your cultural, religious, cognitively bias preferences. BUT, when within the commons you speak only one language, and it’s law is supreme “P RECIPROCITY.” That’s our unity sanctuary. That’s how we compromise and prosper and not destroy our ancestral heritage.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-04 23:00:00 UTC

  • FROM 2018: PREDICTIONS (reminder to repost via James Knowles) —“Given the curr

    FROM 2018: PREDICTIONS

    (reminder to repost via James Knowles)

    —“Given the current accelerating rate of ideological and racial polarization, how likely is it in America that the country will enter an era of large-scale sectarian violence at some point in this century?”— A Friend

    by Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    I’ve stated since 2006 that we would have a violent revolution between 2020 and 2025. I stated that the economy would fail by 2008 (it did) would not recover until at least ‘14 (I was right), that would peak its recovery in ‘17/18 (I was right) and that the next correction would coincide with demographic, political, and economic collapse, at the very same moment that american military and political power would be impossible to sustain the remains of the british empire we inherited at the war’s end. (I will be correct.)

    I know this because of economics, demographics, the conflict of civilizations, and the great power struggles that result. The entire suite of socialist experiments worldwide across the 20th century have failed, and so the right (classical liberal rule of law) would have won if not for immigration overwhelming the country via the six massive-immigration-cities. However, since the left was successful in achieving through third world immigration and the destruction of the nuclear family what they could not achieve through their ideas, the only solution to intolerable conflict is separation.

    Both Communist-Antifa/BLM/Soros and the Nationalist-Right Coalitions were very close to starting a war after the Trump victory overturned the left’s belief in victory, and had Charlottesville been slightly more violent such that the Right wingers defended themselves with the rather vast arsenal they had with them, it would have started there. But all that occurred in the aftermath has been the elimination of the nazi symbolism from the hard right, and the down-funding of BLM/Antifa by Soros, who has instead switched to funding the anti-gun movement to achieve the same ends.

    What’s occurring right now is that the Trump administration is serving as a sufficient proxy for violence. The right’s current plan is to wait until the left attempts to prosecute Trump for (correctly) attempting to shut down. The left is waiting for their long awaited win.

    Meanwhile the very few adults left in positions of power understand that any misstep by either side will result in the bloodiest civil war in human history. And I say that having a very clear understanding of how fragile our prosperity is, and how easy it is to fall into all against all fighting for food and water.

    We are going to have some sort of civil war, the outcome of which I suspect will be devolution of central powers to the states or regions, since this is the only means of preserving the military, retirement, and medical services, while cities, states, and regions determine their cultures, norms, and values. The principle change is that laws on permissible behavior and therefore citizenship will fragment into the old european model. After which the european experiment will follow suit.

    I know, this ‘reformation’ will occur, because I’m going to make certain of it. And I’m going to make certain of it for the simple reason that the civil war will happen and a random outcome after millions are dead and the world descends into war, is far worse than an agreeable settlement.

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-04 11:48:00 UTC

  • HOW TO INCENTIVISE THE MILITIA: by Noah J Revoy Give a 20% tax reduction to men

    HOW TO INCENTIVISE THE MILITIA:

    by Noah J Revoy

    Give a 20% tax reduction to men who qualify for the militia.

    Make martial training available in schools from 14 years old up.

    Eliminate tax on militia equipment and training.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 18:16:00 UTC

  • IT’S OUR DUTY TO PROTECT THOSE VICTIMIZED BY BAITING INTO HAZARD by Scott De War

    IT’S OUR DUTY TO PROTECT THOSE VICTIMIZED BY BAITING INTO HAZARD

    by Scott De Warren

    Noblesse oblige. Yes, ironically, It is our duty to protect our people, especially the majority that lack agency and the discernment to detect the enemy’s propaganda that baits them into hazard (and pulls the rest of us down with them).

    The irony is that these, our own people, constantly betray us by siding with the enemy.

    In England, France, and even America our people were encouraged to rebel against their king and aristocracy – often on the thinnest of pretexts.

    In the American revolution, for ex., Samuel Adams organized the rough dock workers to attack the upper classes and destroy their fine houses over what was essentially a 1% tax imposed by Britain on legal papers.

    Now the descendants of those dockworkers pay 50% taxes without blinking. Yet they will still rail against kings and aristocrats – the ones that taxed them 1% to protect them militarily while praising foreign hostiles that tax them 50% while taking way their borders, liberties, and that sponsor third world invasions because it is all sold as ‘democratic’.

    No, the people will be protected from such lies going forward by making the liars answerable in a court of law.

    —“You have no duty to those that have betrayed you. If anything, the duty to those that haven’t betrayed you is to punish those that have.”—Martin Štěpán


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 17:51:00 UTC

  • LOYALTY DOES NOT REQUIRE EQUALITY Yes common people are comparatively simple. I

    LOYALTY DOES NOT REQUIRE EQUALITY

    Yes common people are comparatively simple. I don’t do simple. I don’t know how. That said, I LOVE the common man. I live to SERVE the common man. My work is in the INTEREST of the common man. That doesn’t mean I can speak his language. It doesn’t mean I consider us peers. Aristocracy does not coddle by denying class differences. We show loyalty despite our class differences. BEcause loyalty is enough. Because it is reciprocity. And we are kin.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 14:02:00 UTC

  • Why is that unpopular? it’s obvious. Hence rothbard’s fallacy of libertarian ana

    Why is that unpopular? it’s obvious. Hence rothbard’s fallacy of libertarian anarcho-capitalism imitating the pale, hoppe’s fallacy of covenant communities imitating german free cities, or american’s imitating the fresh continent to conquer: Russia, German, British Empire Defense


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 17:56:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1256643854410842112

    Reply addressees: @padrebrendon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1256390891645874177

  • WHAT I LEARNED ABOUT REVOLUTIONS 1) I learned from napoleon that the best genera

    WHAT I LEARNED ABOUT REVOLUTIONS

    1) I learned from napoleon that the best general does not plan for a single strategy, but plans a strategy of seizing opportunity.

    2) I learned from Mao that the countryside can always and everywhere defeat the cities.

    3) I learned from ISIS to move move move and resource resource, and profit profit profit, because, concentration of force is difficult, and it deprives opposition of resources, and it motivates the men.

    4) I learned from the arab spring how fast revolutions spread to people with similar anxieties, and that we are in the same condition.

    5) I learned from the IRA that you always win with time, especially if you use both political and military actions.

    6) I learned from the past twenty years that americans cannot fight and win a fourth generation war.

    7) I learned from the civil rights movement that the government caves to demands rather than face chaos.

    8) I learned from the the LA, Baltimore, and KC riots – and charlottesville – that the police are only symbolically powerful – and only for as long as they aren’t outmaneuvered.

    9) I learned from strategic research that the USA cannot survive power outages and road checkpoints for more than a few weeks.

    10) I learned from the data that there are very few people capable of resisting a movement that originates in multiple places at once.

    11) I learned from the past four years that the deep state will not ‘go’ without ‘a fight’.

    12) I learned from the data that a constitutional solution will be supported by the majority of men in the military especially if accompanied by the right incentives.

    13) I learned from the evidence that left and right might align on taking out the financial sector, and gutting the state if we both agree to separate.

    14) I learned from the past thirty years that the left in all its forms is confident it can win and must be stopped permanently.

    15) I learned that it is relatively easy to restore our place in human history and lift our people again in to a renaissance if we win.

    I learned a lot more too….


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 14:46:00 UTC

  • I”m not against anyone. But you’re either integrating into the militia, the natu

    I”m not against anyone. But you’re either integrating into the militia, the natural law, duty reciprocity and truth, markets in everything, trifunctionalism, optimum government, and evolutionary necessity or you’re not only undermining western civlization, but mankind, and you’re not only depriving those of us who inherited all those institutions from self determination but leaving us no choice but war.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 14:14:00 UTC

  • “In the 1960’s the radicals were too small a percentage of the population to be

    —“In the 1960’s the radicals were too small a percentage of the population to be a real threat, so their bombings was not regarded as the tip of any iceberg (except when blacks got involved and there was concern that all blacks would revolt). … Today the revolt against over-reach represents a larger group of people, and therefore has to be taken more seriously.”—Red-State Secession


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 09:01:00 UTC

  • TACTICS These posts are an illustration of the current form of warfare – fourth

    TACTICS

    These posts are an illustration of the current form of warfare – fourth generation warfare. This is the dominant form of warfare – as illustrated by iran – because military action is no longer possible by most actors. Therefore the use of “irregulars” is once again returning to norm after the long ‘rules of war’ institutionalized by europeans to the point where we assumed our ‘pacification of warfare’ was a given.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-01 22:02:00 UTC