John Mark Is the Political Face of Our Movement https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/john-mark-is-the-political-face-of-our-movement/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:22:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265664780561461250
John Mark Is the Political Face of Our Movement https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/john-mark-is-the-political-face-of-our-movement/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:22:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265664780561461250
Propertarianism: Harnessing the Power of Western Civilization youtube.com Sure, I conceived of it. The lot of us completed it. But John is turning it from an intellectual to a political movement. He’s brilliant. And this one video is … this one video is … the entirety of the solution in comprehensible form. It’s the message. We have – research and development (me with others’ help) – education and training (SN folk) – marketing (john mark) – evangelism many many more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtD8sF8cKN0&
Propertarianism: Harnessing the Power of Western Civilization youtube.com Sure, I conceived of it. The lot of us completed it. But John is turning it from an intellectual to a political movement. He’s brilliant. And this one video is … this one video is … the entirety of the solution in comprehensible form. It’s the message. We have – research and development (me with others’ help) – education and training (SN folk) – marketing (john mark) – evangelism many many more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtD8sF8cKN0&
Demonstrate Investment First Before Obtaining Influence https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/demonstrate-investment-first-before-obtaining-influence/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:22:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265664668598755329
Oct 30, 2019, 3:49 PM :Solve the voting problem without the collateral damag””
—“It was universal suffrage males who gave women the vote, and in 1932, it was men who supported FDR over Hoover (who women supported more). Voting used to be granted as a reward for responsibilities, as a consequence of it. Own land, pay taxes and part of the militia who keeps the country free against enemies foreign/domestic? You get to vote because of those responsibilities. Emphasis on voting as a reward for responsibilities solves the voting problem without the collateral damage.“—Steve Pender
Oct 30, 2019, 3:49 PM :Solve the voting problem without the collateral damag””
—“It was universal suffrage males who gave women the vote, and in 1932, it was men who supported FDR over Hoover (who women supported more). Voting used to be granted as a reward for responsibilities, as a consequence of it. Own land, pay taxes and part of the militia who keeps the country free against enemies foreign/domestic? You get to vote because of those responsibilities. Emphasis on voting as a reward for responsibilities solves the voting problem without the collateral damage.“—Steve Pender
Deliver Each Unto God and Unto Caesar https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/deliver-each-unto-god-and-unto-caesar/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 13:37:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265638209956073473
Oct 30, 2019, 11:01 PM The Catholics have been communists for a very long time, no matter what they use. Christianity has everything to say about family, manners, ethics and morality, and nothing at all to say about sciences, economics, politics and law. Deliver unto god what is his, and Caesar his. Otherwise we must go to war between the truthful and the faithful, and while the faithful can undermine, and resist, they poorly war, and this is not only because they are poorer, but because they are more feminine in composition and cognition. “Deliver Unto To Each” is a compromise between the male political-empirical and the female emotional-faithful, just as marriage is a compromise between male and female – under which neither obtains their ideal, but both achieves the optimum possible. Edit
Oct 30, 2019, 11:01 PM The Catholics have been communists for a very long time, no matter what they use. Christianity has everything to say about family, manners, ethics and morality, and nothing at all to say about sciences, economics, politics and law. Deliver unto god what is his, and Caesar his. Otherwise we must go to war between the truthful and the faithful, and while the faithful can undermine, and resist, they poorly war, and this is not only because they are poorer, but because they are more feminine in composition and cognition. “Deliver Unto To Each” is a compromise between the male political-empirical and the female emotional-faithful, just as marriage is a compromise between male and female – under which neither obtains their ideal, but both achieves the optimum possible. Edit
Traditional Elective Monarchy https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/traditional-elective-monarchy/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 04:46:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265504724092141570