May 7 at 1:10 PM · by John Mark (I found a few in a comment section on someone else’s post.) Timing matters. Plans matter. Even though there is already all the moral authority necessary and then some, “an undeniable excuse” matters. People exhaust all other options. Virus lockdowns in the face of the real data are approaching that undeniable excuse. People who have been hopping mad for decades are targeting their timing around a moment when critical mass is strong (waiting for a particularly good opportunity) because it increases chance of success. It increases the percentage and numbers of the population willing to “support and copy and join” rather than disavowing out of ignorance, comfort, or fear. Accusing high-agency people who are being smart of being “larpers” is simply false. (I’m not saying there is no such thing as a larper, I’m saying there are many who are not, but are being smart in order to maximize chance of success.) Anyone who countersignals using 2A for its primary intended purpose is either a moron or a coward or both. Force can never be off the table, because if you take it off the table, you are guaranteed to be walked all over by your enemies forever. These people that countersignal using 2A for its primary purpose are just showing their cowardice and idiocy. They have no solution to offer. Either they don’t understand the situation – they don’t realize soon the Right will win no more national elections due to immigration (Covid will give us only temporary reprieve if the current system is not upended), and they don’t realize why persuasion doesn’t work on the Left – or they do understand it and are just weak. Even if you yourself can’t or won’t pay the price or take the risk necessary to be “tip of the spear”, why on earth would you countersignal those who are and will? What kind of idiot countersignals those who are willing to risk their own lives to save your ass? (And if you think “it’s impossible to win” you have no understanding of 4G warfare, or the basic numbers of armed people on each “team”, etc.) Ask these countersignalers what their proposed solution is – they have none. If they have any ideas to offer, it’s always either “form white communities” (you’ll have to use force eventually anyway, you’ll just be on defense instead of on offense), or some version of “we can persuade people” which is dead on arrival due to nonwhite immigration. Don’t countersignal the groups that may seem to be “larpers” to you, either. Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between larpers and those who will do what it takes. Sure, many are normiecons/civnats but that just means that the Smart/Winning Right must lead them. Look around. Normiecons are casually talking about bombing the govorner’s mansion due to these lockdowns. A groundswell of support for “replacing the current system” is building on the Right at a faster and faster rate. Why would someone choose this moment to countersignal using 2A for its main purpose and take force off the table? Silly.
Theme: Governance
-
Amazingly, There Are Still a Few Village Idiots that Countersignal Use of 2 a For Its Primary Intended Purpose
May 7 at 1:10 PM · by John Mark (I found a few in a comment section on someone else’s post.) Timing matters. Plans matter. Even though there is already all the moral authority necessary and then some, “an undeniable excuse” matters. People exhaust all other options. Virus lockdowns in the face of the real data are approaching that undeniable excuse. People who have been hopping mad for decades are targeting their timing around a moment when critical mass is strong (waiting for a particularly good opportunity) because it increases chance of success. It increases the percentage and numbers of the population willing to “support and copy and join” rather than disavowing out of ignorance, comfort, or fear. Accusing high-agency people who are being smart of being “larpers” is simply false. (I’m not saying there is no such thing as a larper, I’m saying there are many who are not, but are being smart in order to maximize chance of success.) Anyone who countersignals using 2A for its primary intended purpose is either a moron or a coward or both. Force can never be off the table, because if you take it off the table, you are guaranteed to be walked all over by your enemies forever. These people that countersignal using 2A for its primary purpose are just showing their cowardice and idiocy. They have no solution to offer. Either they don’t understand the situation – they don’t realize soon the Right will win no more national elections due to immigration (Covid will give us only temporary reprieve if the current system is not upended), and they don’t realize why persuasion doesn’t work on the Left – or they do understand it and are just weak. Even if you yourself can’t or won’t pay the price or take the risk necessary to be “tip of the spear”, why on earth would you countersignal those who are and will? What kind of idiot countersignals those who are willing to risk their own lives to save your ass? (And if you think “it’s impossible to win” you have no understanding of 4G warfare, or the basic numbers of armed people on each “team”, etc.) Ask these countersignalers what their proposed solution is – they have none. If they have any ideas to offer, it’s always either “form white communities” (you’ll have to use force eventually anyway, you’ll just be on defense instead of on offense), or some version of “we can persuade people” which is dead on arrival due to nonwhite immigration. Don’t countersignal the groups that may seem to be “larpers” to you, either. Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between larpers and those who will do what it takes. Sure, many are normiecons/civnats but that just means that the Smart/Winning Right must lead them. Look around. Normiecons are casually talking about bombing the govorner’s mansion due to these lockdowns. A groundswell of support for “replacing the current system” is building on the Right at a faster and faster rate. Why would someone choose this moment to countersignal using 2A for its main purpose and take force off the table? Silly.
-
Monarchy as “Everything of Last Resort”
Monarchy as “Everything of Last Resort” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/monarchy-as-everything-of-last-resort/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:43:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265851284042797056
-
Monarchy as “Everything of Last Resort”
May 8, 2020, 10:22 AM
- Above The Military
… 1. Head of the armed forces.
… 2. Power to Declaration of War - Above Legislation
… 1. Issue Assent(veto) w/o no bill can be passed to form a law.
… 2. The Queen has the right to be consulted, to encourage, and to warn her ministers.
… 3. In times of “grave constitutional crisis”, the Queen has the power to VETO any ministerial advice/opinion.
… 4. No regulation of the monarchy may be bought before - Revenue competition between the monarchy (military, arts), parliament (commons), and church (care) should have been preserved, and commingling of income prohibited.
2 Above the law (technically she ‘is’ the law.) … 1. No permission: including no license, no passport, no tax. … 2. immunity from inquiry(including Information requests) … 3. immunity from prosecution … 4. immunity from liability … 5. issue passports and pardons 3 – Above Government … 1. Appointment (Confirmation) of Prime Minister (veto) … 2. Appointment of (Confirmation of) Ministers (veto) … 3. Opening and Dismissal of Parliament (Rescinded, we restore) … 4. Appoint Lords 4 – Above The Church … 1. supreme governor of the established Church of England. 5 – Above Status … 1. Appoint Knights, Create knightly orders, … 2. Bestow Honors. … 3. Take Ownership of Chosen Excellence (She owns all the swans in the River Thames and Dolphins in the Sea.) 6 – Above the Civilization (Empire): Queen of the English Speaking Peoples … 1. Queen of Britain … 2. She’s also the Queen of Australia. … 3. Apart from being the Head of State of UK and Australia, she’s also dominion to all these commonwealth realms: Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands, and Tuvalu. THE BIGGEST MISTAKE IN HISTORY 7. Above Finance … 1. Ownership of the bank of England and the Treasury. or for that matter, the bank of our civilization.. … 2. Insurer of last resort. AND 1. The parliament should have been limited to contracts of the commons.
- Above The Military
-
Monarchy as “Everything of Last Resort”
May 8, 2020, 10:22 AM
- Above The Military
… 1. Head of the armed forces.
… 2. Power to Declaration of War - Above Legislation
… 1. Issue Assent(veto) w/o no bill can be passed to form a law.
… 2. The Queen has the right to be consulted, to encourage, and to warn her ministers.
… 3. In times of “grave constitutional crisis”, the Queen has the power to VETO any ministerial advice/opinion.
… 4. No regulation of the monarchy may be bought before - Revenue competition between the monarchy (military, arts), parliament (commons), and church (care) should have been preserved, and commingling of income prohibited.
2 Above the law (technically she ‘is’ the law.) … 1. No permission: including no license, no passport, no tax. … 2. immunity from inquiry(including Information requests) … 3. immunity from prosecution … 4. immunity from liability … 5. issue passports and pardons 3 – Above Government … 1. Appointment (Confirmation) of Prime Minister (veto) … 2. Appointment of (Confirmation of) Ministers (veto) … 3. Opening and Dismissal of Parliament (Rescinded, we restore) … 4. Appoint Lords 4 – Above The Church … 1. supreme governor of the established Church of England. 5 – Above Status … 1. Appoint Knights, Create knightly orders, … 2. Bestow Honors. … 3. Take Ownership of Chosen Excellence (She owns all the swans in the River Thames and Dolphins in the Sea.) 6 – Above the Civilization (Empire): Queen of the English Speaking Peoples … 1. Queen of Britain … 2. She’s also the Queen of Australia. … 3. Apart from being the Head of State of UK and Australia, she’s also dominion to all these commonwealth realms: Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands, and Tuvalu. THE BIGGEST MISTAKE IN HISTORY 7. Above Finance … 1. Ownership of the bank of England and the Treasury. or for that matter, the bank of our civilization.. … 2. Insurer of last resort. AND 1. The parliament should have been limited to contracts of the commons.
- Above The Military
-
Will the P constitution include a modern version of the law of Hue and Cry?
May 8, 2020, 10:48 AM By Noah J Revoy
—“Will the P constitution include a modern version of the law of Hue and Cry? “By the Statute of Winchester of 1285, 13 Edw. I cc. 1 and 4, it was provided that anyone, either a constable or a private citizen, who witnessed a crime shall make hue and cry, and that the hue and cry must be kept up against the fleeing criminal from town to town and from county to county, until the felon is apprehended and delivered to the sheriff. All able-bodied men, upon hearing the shouts, were obliged to assist in the pursuit of the criminal, which makes it comparable to the posse comitatus. Men who failed to join the posse “the whole hundred … shall be answerable” for the theft or robbery committed, in effect a form of collective punishment for failing to uphold the law. Those who raised a hue and cry falsely were themselves guilty of a crime.” Every man a sherif.”—
Yes, it’s in there: NEW CONSTITUTION > … Article III – Rights, Obligations, and In-alienations > … … Section IV – Reciprocity in Defense > … … … Topic: Extra-Judicial Discipline, Cessation, Restitution, and Punishment … … … … Item 7 – The Obligation To Defend … … … … Item 8 – Obligation to Discipline … … … … … Item 9 – Obligation to Accept Discipline …
-
Will the P constitution include a modern version of the law of Hue and Cry?
May 8, 2020, 10:48 AM By Noah J Revoy
—“Will the P constitution include a modern version of the law of Hue and Cry? “By the Statute of Winchester of 1285, 13 Edw. I cc. 1 and 4, it was provided that anyone, either a constable or a private citizen, who witnessed a crime shall make hue and cry, and that the hue and cry must be kept up against the fleeing criminal from town to town and from county to county, until the felon is apprehended and delivered to the sheriff. All able-bodied men, upon hearing the shouts, were obliged to assist in the pursuit of the criminal, which makes it comparable to the posse comitatus. Men who failed to join the posse “the whole hundred … shall be answerable” for the theft or robbery committed, in effect a form of collective punishment for failing to uphold the law. Those who raised a hue and cry falsely were themselves guilty of a crime.” Every man a sherif.”—
Yes, it’s in there: NEW CONSTITUTION > … Article III – Rights, Obligations, and In-alienations > … … Section IV – Reciprocity in Defense > … … … Topic: Extra-Judicial Discipline, Cessation, Restitution, and Punishment … … … … Item 7 – The Obligation To Defend … … … … Item 8 – Obligation to Discipline … … … … … Item 9 – Obligation to Accept Discipline …
-
We Must Bear the Cost of Sovereignty and Liberty
We Must Bear the Cost of Sovereignty and Liberty https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/we-must-bear-the-cost-of-sovereignty-and-liberty/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:35:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265849095547166720
-
We Must Bear the Cost of Sovereignty and Liberty
May 9, 2020, 11:01 AM
It takes a *small number of people* willing to pay the price of rule, to obtain and hold rule. It takes having something to offer. And we have a great deal to offer.
Truth is costly. Solutions are costly. Leadership is costly. But what we are purchasing the survival of our civilization. So I choose to pay the cost. An I understand that not all can fight this war because they cannot bear that cost.
-
We Must Bear the Cost of Sovereignty and Liberty
May 9, 2020, 11:01 AM
It takes a *small number of people* willing to pay the price of rule, to obtain and hold rule. It takes having something to offer. And we have a great deal to offer.
Truth is costly. Solutions are costly. Leadership is costly. But what we are purchasing the survival of our civilization. So I choose to pay the cost. An I understand that not all can fight this war because they cannot bear that cost.