Theme: Governance

  • No. We Tried to Defend from The Leftists by Surviving Their Failures

    Mar 23, 2020, 11:16 PM

    —“Yes. Anglo-American free market conservatives have destroyed America and the UK”—Lord Keynes

    Can you explain that to me because america was clearly destroyed by the postwar undermining of our civilization from within, financialization of the economy to defeat the soviets, export of industry to defeat the unions, attempt at expanding housing, to defeat the leftists. We have falsified the entire postwar anti-darwinian leftist program of marxism, socialism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and science denialism, and would have no civil conflict if not for immigration, nor resistance to automation. We could follow the japanese strategy of a homogenous polity gracefully automating our lack of need of labor. I don’t see anglos to blame here. I see only one mistake: conservative decision in the 80’s to let leftist programs fail was fine, but our failure to anticipate the immigrant hordes and their voting for a party of failed pseudoscience, sophistry, and undermining. In the end evidence won,but didn’t matter: hordes. Now there is only one question – whether we divorce, separate, and the conservatives return to our natural market eugenics and automation while we let the left fail, or we have a bloody civil war to defeat the failed left pseudoscience and sophism, despite the hordes. The Free Market Ideology (libertarianism) is another Jewish, not anglo, movement: Boas, Freud pseudoscience, Marx economic pseudoscience, cantor-bohr-keynes pseudomath, Adorno-Fromm Neo-Marxism, Derrida-postmodernism, Rand-Rothbard Libertarian, Trotsky-strauss-kristol neocon The Hayekian movement recommended empirical RULE OF LAW, and the prevention of the expansion of socialism arbitrary rule. The problem was the right lacked the science (evidence) to defeat the left false promise baiting into hazard. We have the science. The left was wrong. Period. This is the greatest pseudo scientific movement in history with a strategic and tactical repetition of the means by which rome was undermined by theological false promise just as the 20th was undermined by pseudoscientific false promise. The right could only wait for evidence. I know, because I was there, and this is how we discussed the problem of the age: Marxism had failed, the Great Society had failed, the oil crisis failure, and the failure in iran. We made a decision. Except for immigration we would have won. The left didn’t win by ideas.

  • No. We Tried to Defend from The Leftists by Surviving Their Failures

    Mar 23, 2020, 11:16 PM

    —“Yes. Anglo-American free market conservatives have destroyed America and the UK”—Lord Keynes

    Can you explain that to me because america was clearly destroyed by the postwar undermining of our civilization from within, financialization of the economy to defeat the soviets, export of industry to defeat the unions, attempt at expanding housing, to defeat the leftists. We have falsified the entire postwar anti-darwinian leftist program of marxism, socialism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and science denialism, and would have no civil conflict if not for immigration, nor resistance to automation. We could follow the japanese strategy of a homogenous polity gracefully automating our lack of need of labor. I don’t see anglos to blame here. I see only one mistake: conservative decision in the 80’s to let leftist programs fail was fine, but our failure to anticipate the immigrant hordes and their voting for a party of failed pseudoscience, sophistry, and undermining. In the end evidence won,but didn’t matter: hordes. Now there is only one question – whether we divorce, separate, and the conservatives return to our natural market eugenics and automation while we let the left fail, or we have a bloody civil war to defeat the failed left pseudoscience and sophism, despite the hordes. The Free Market Ideology (libertarianism) is another Jewish, not anglo, movement: Boas, Freud pseudoscience, Marx economic pseudoscience, cantor-bohr-keynes pseudomath, Adorno-Fromm Neo-Marxism, Derrida-postmodernism, Rand-Rothbard Libertarian, Trotsky-strauss-kristol neocon The Hayekian movement recommended empirical RULE OF LAW, and the prevention of the expansion of socialism arbitrary rule. The problem was the right lacked the science (evidence) to defeat the left false promise baiting into hazard. We have the science. The left was wrong. Period. This is the greatest pseudo scientific movement in history with a strategic and tactical repetition of the means by which rome was undermined by theological false promise just as the 20th was undermined by pseudoscientific false promise. The right could only wait for evidence. I know, because I was there, and this is how we discussed the problem of the age: Marxism had failed, the Great Society had failed, the oil crisis failure, and the failure in iran. We made a decision. Except for immigration we would have won. The left didn’t win by ideas.

  • The Intermarium Begins. (I Am Thrilled)

    The Intermarium Begins. (I Am Thrilled) https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/the-intermarium-begins-i-am-thrilled/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 19:01:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266082148773224448

  • The Intermarium Begins. (I Am Thrilled)

    Mar 24, 2020, 9:08 AM Europe’s plan to checkmate Russia youtube.com No one can defeat russia in a land war until china chooses to defeat russia in a land war. No one can afford to conduct other than an economic war against russia because of the nuclear arsenal (that we should never have taken from Ukraine.) But … could russia HOLD ukraine? Russia has too small a population and too small an economy to compete as a world power by other than monopolizing the territorial resources to fund and build military prowess – which in and of itself always provides host peoples with extraordinary technological advantage – over time. This is one of the secrets of american success. the military industrial complex performs the majority of basic competitive research. If russia stays on trend, uses resources to accumulate military and technological power, then restores the fabulous russian education system, and continues putin’s program of incrementally expanding rule of law into the economy, the future requires only the limitation of islam ,the reconquest of the southeast (kazakhstan), until nato abandon’s turkey, and russia is free to pursue southward. It is possible to negotiate with ukraine for east of the dnipr. The west of ukraine is too european for russia, and will join the intermarium (three seas initiative). The balance of resources in russia, and rule of law, agrarian production, in the intermarium (three seas), and the eventual end of the need for nato given french existing arms, germania’s necessity of rearmament, and the intermarium’s rearmament should provide a balance of powers across europe. Naturally the UK, USA, Australia with mexico as labor force and canada as resource provider will form a pseudo-anglo block. South americans will eventually solve their problems and form a block. China, india, and three or four islams will form different blocks. and africa, at some point will form a block and the end of the globalist project will be over with and we will return to historical norms EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S SUB-CIVILIZATIONSGreater Anglosphere UK 68m USA 330m (200m really) Canada 37m Australia 25m

    NZ 4.6m

    ~464m (340m?) Greater Scandinavia Protestant Europe: Finland 5.5m Norway 5.3m Sweden 10m Denmark 5.8m Netherlands 17.4m Germany 83m

    And yes, Italy North. 60.5m GDP $2.07 trillion USD (2018)

    ~187.5m Catholic West Europe France 66m Spain 46.4 Portugal 10.2

    South Italy …

    ~110.4m Intermarium(three seas) Austria 9m Bulgaria 7m Croatia 4m Czech Republic 11m Estonia 1.3m Hungary 10m Latvia 2m Lithuania 3m Poland 38m Romania 20m Slovakia 5.4m

    Slovenia 2m

    ~213m 470,649 square mile.

    European Ukraine: ~30m. ~160,000sq m

    30m Russia 144m GDP: $1.66 trillion USD

    Belarus 10m

    ~154m ~6,601,670 sq m. (Russia is VAST) So russia has a vast territory, a medium population and only 1.6T in gdp. Italy has a third of the population of russia and a third more gdp. What does that mean? Russia has a cheaper labor force to use in a military. But it can’t afford a military with that labor force. Can italy be a world power? Can russia be a world power? No.

  • The Intermarium Begins. (I Am Thrilled)

    Mar 24, 2020, 9:08 AM Europe’s plan to checkmate Russia youtube.com No one can defeat russia in a land war until china chooses to defeat russia in a land war. No one can afford to conduct other than an economic war against russia because of the nuclear arsenal (that we should never have taken from Ukraine.) But … could russia HOLD ukraine? Russia has too small a population and too small an economy to compete as a world power by other than monopolizing the territorial resources to fund and build military prowess – which in and of itself always provides host peoples with extraordinary technological advantage – over time. This is one of the secrets of american success. the military industrial complex performs the majority of basic competitive research. If russia stays on trend, uses resources to accumulate military and technological power, then restores the fabulous russian education system, and continues putin’s program of incrementally expanding rule of law into the economy, the future requires only the limitation of islam ,the reconquest of the southeast (kazakhstan), until nato abandon’s turkey, and russia is free to pursue southward. It is possible to negotiate with ukraine for east of the dnipr. The west of ukraine is too european for russia, and will join the intermarium (three seas initiative). The balance of resources in russia, and rule of law, agrarian production, in the intermarium (three seas), and the eventual end of the need for nato given french existing arms, germania’s necessity of rearmament, and the intermarium’s rearmament should provide a balance of powers across europe. Naturally the UK, USA, Australia with mexico as labor force and canada as resource provider will form a pseudo-anglo block. South americans will eventually solve their problems and form a block. China, india, and three or four islams will form different blocks. and africa, at some point will form a block and the end of the globalist project will be over with and we will return to historical norms EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S SUB-CIVILIZATIONSGreater Anglosphere UK 68m USA 330m (200m really) Canada 37m Australia 25m

    NZ 4.6m

    ~464m (340m?) Greater Scandinavia Protestant Europe: Finland 5.5m Norway 5.3m Sweden 10m Denmark 5.8m Netherlands 17.4m Germany 83m

    And yes, Italy North. 60.5m GDP $2.07 trillion USD (2018)

    ~187.5m Catholic West Europe France 66m Spain 46.4 Portugal 10.2

    South Italy …

    ~110.4m Intermarium(three seas) Austria 9m Bulgaria 7m Croatia 4m Czech Republic 11m Estonia 1.3m Hungary 10m Latvia 2m Lithuania 3m Poland 38m Romania 20m Slovakia 5.4m

    Slovenia 2m

    ~213m 470,649 square mile.

    European Ukraine: ~30m. ~160,000sq m

    30m Russia 144m GDP: $1.66 trillion USD

    Belarus 10m

    ~154m ~6,601,670 sq m. (Russia is VAST) So russia has a vast territory, a medium population and only 1.6T in gdp. Italy has a third of the population of russia and a third more gdp. What does that mean? Russia has a cheaper labor force to use in a military. But it can’t afford a military with that labor force. Can italy be a world power? Can russia be a world power? No.

  • Russia vs America

    Russia vs America. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/russia-vs-america/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 16:36:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266045672081494016

  • Russia vs America.

    Mar 24, 2020, 7:36 PM (FROM ELSEWHERE) Context. Russia vs America. Saying: “Russians can’t believe Americans are that naive, and American’s can’t believe Russians are that paranoid.” Cause: Anglos: Words are Promises, Truth before Face Russians: Words are deception. Truth is for family. Middle east: Words are for posturing. Truth is for fools. China: Words are to deceive and delay. Truth is irrelevant. India: Words are for harmony. What is truth again? Where is your culture on this scale? <-Truth before Face <—-> Face Before Truth->Truth before Face” : truth regardless of cost to the dominance, status, or hierarchy. “Face before Truth“: respect and status regardless of cost to the truth. Humor from anglo-protestant <–> middle east-islamic is very difficult. Because humor depends upon cultural concept of honor. -Cheers. Edit

  • Russia vs America.

    Mar 24, 2020, 7:36 PM (FROM ELSEWHERE) Context. Russia vs America. Saying: “Russians can’t believe Americans are that naive, and American’s can’t believe Russians are that paranoid.” Cause: Anglos: Words are Promises, Truth before Face Russians: Words are deception. Truth is for family. Middle east: Words are for posturing. Truth is for fools. China: Words are to deceive and delay. Truth is irrelevant. India: Words are for harmony. What is truth again? Where is your culture on this scale? <-Truth before Face <—-> Face Before Truth->Truth before Face” : truth regardless of cost to the dominance, status, or hierarchy. “Face before Truth“: respect and status regardless of cost to the truth. Humor from anglo-protestant <–> middle east-islamic is very difficult. Because humor depends upon cultural concept of honor. -Cheers. Edit

  • The Lesson for Useful Idiots

    The Lesson for Useful Idiots https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/the-lesson-for-useful-idiots/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 13:11:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265994160592560135

  • Russian Culture

    Mar 25, 2020, 10:23 PM Russian culture is american with 100x more distrust of the government, and 10x distrust of each other, needing 10x more time to develop loyalty, but having 10x more responsibility for friends and family. They are the warriors and ladies we used to be, and need to be again. I love russians. Especially working with them. Because they never know what good management is. Give it to them and they appreciate it rather than take it for granted. I find more commonality with russians than any other people.