Feb 21, 2020, 8:16 AM
“Revoke citizenship to 1965. Revoke benefits. Prohibit anyone with socialist or postmodernist activities or ‘alien’ religions from residency or citizenship. charge 30% additional income taxes for non-citizens.”
Feb 21, 2020, 8:16 AM
“Revoke citizenship to 1965. Revoke benefits. Prohibit anyone with socialist or postmodernist activities or ‘alien’ religions from residency or citizenship. charge 30% additional income taxes for non-citizens.”
Feb 21, 2020, 8:16 AM
“Revoke citizenship to 1965. Revoke benefits. Prohibit anyone with socialist or postmodernist activities or ‘alien’ religions from residency or citizenship. charge 30% additional income taxes for non-citizens.”
If you can’t man-up and discuss politics then you are just a child with pinwheels and cotton candy totally ignorant of the content of adult conversation.
The revolt is over political power to displace whites.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 11:59:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266700738157326336
Reply addressees: @TheKanehB @vamosvigilante @VulcanSpooky
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266700480689963008
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TheKanehB @vamosvigilante @VulcanSpooky Mimi you are a woman arguing your feminine moral instincts and completely over your head in political argument.
Life is Competition
All politics is proxy for violence.
The subtext in all political discourse is violence.
All Political argument, demands under threat of violence.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1266700480689963008
All Political Conflict Is Reducible to This One Question. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/all-political-conflict-is-reducible-to-this-one-question/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 23:10:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266507356298493953
Feb 28, 2020, 10:06 AM This is the answer you know. All political conflict is reducible to this one question. The entirety of the left’s spectrum of ideology serves only to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction.
LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary The left denies evolutionary pressure and necessity exists.
-vs-
RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary. The right only debates its cause: intent rather than accident. This is why the right is ‘right’. Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate.
Feb 28, 2020, 10:06 AM This is the answer you know. All political conflict is reducible to this one question. The entirety of the left’s spectrum of ideology serves only to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction.
LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary The left denies evolutionary pressure and necessity exists.
-vs-
RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary. The right only debates its cause: intent rather than accident. This is why the right is ‘right’. Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate.
Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Female Cognitive Warfare Expression https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/heaping-of-undue-praise-all-left-political-behavior-is-female-cognitive-warfare-expression/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:36:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266483501576130560
The Law of The Cycles of Political Orders https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/the-law-of-the-cycles-of-political-orders/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:34:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266483070775054336
Eric Danelaw shared a link. Mar 2, 2020, 12:14 PM Class: The Little Word the Elites Want You to Forget, from truthdig.comTHE LAW OF THE CYCLES OF POLITICAL ORDERS (thanks for the invite to comment) Organizations evolve to exploit an opportunity that can only be exploited by organizations. The organizational myth, history, tradition, rules, methods of description, persuasion, and argument expand until all available opportunity, rents, extractions, and predations under it are exhausted and all incentives to persist the organization are exhausted by enough of the population that they are incentivized to seek other opportunities. At that point in the shift of incentives, the opportunity that evolves is radical extra-political reorganization of capital, elites, and institutions, to eliminate the accumulated, rents, extractions, and predations so that incentive to persist organization of the polity, society, community, is restored. This reorganization can consist of three possibilities, including i) retention of strategy but redistribution of capital and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of law), ii) rotation of strategy, elites, and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of legislation), or iii) replacement of strategy, elites, institutions altogether (best if under tyranny). For example Picketty is right in some sense, but it turns out that the aristocracies were actually better than we thought because they had Hoppeian incentives to avoid the tragedy of the commons, and to persist the polity and society while continuously reorganizing the institutions and elites. This is why we ( or at least I) have recommended (in the new constitutional amendments) capital reallocation, institutional reformation, and a shift back to intergenerational elites, on a scale not seen since the roman reforms. We don’t do things too badly. But our 20th century experiments in variations on the ancient tripartite order under rule of law largely didn’t work. There is a reason we evolved so quickly compared to other civilizations despite the dark ages. We already invented perfect government. We just didn’t adapt it correctly in response to the industrial revolution. Because we didn’t understand why we’d been successful. Now we do. Cheers.
Eric Danelaw shared a link. Mar 2, 2020, 12:14 PM Class: The Little Word the Elites Want You to Forget, from truthdig.comTHE LAW OF THE CYCLES OF POLITICAL ORDERS (thanks for the invite to comment) Organizations evolve to exploit an opportunity that can only be exploited by organizations. The organizational myth, history, tradition, rules, methods of description, persuasion, and argument expand until all available opportunity, rents, extractions, and predations under it are exhausted and all incentives to persist the organization are exhausted by enough of the population that they are incentivized to seek other opportunities. At that point in the shift of incentives, the opportunity that evolves is radical extra-political reorganization of capital, elites, and institutions, to eliminate the accumulated, rents, extractions, and predations so that incentive to persist organization of the polity, society, community, is restored. This reorganization can consist of three possibilities, including i) retention of strategy but redistribution of capital and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of law), ii) rotation of strategy, elites, and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of legislation), or iii) replacement of strategy, elites, institutions altogether (best if under tyranny). For example Picketty is right in some sense, but it turns out that the aristocracies were actually better than we thought because they had Hoppeian incentives to avoid the tragedy of the commons, and to persist the polity and society while continuously reorganizing the institutions and elites. This is why we ( or at least I) have recommended (in the new constitutional amendments) capital reallocation, institutional reformation, and a shift back to intergenerational elites, on a scale not seen since the roman reforms. We don’t do things too badly. But our 20th century experiments in variations on the ancient tripartite order under rule of law largely didn’t work. There is a reason we evolved so quickly compared to other civilizations despite the dark ages. We already invented perfect government. We just didn’t adapt it correctly in response to the industrial revolution. Because we didn’t understand why we’d been successful. Now we do. Cheers.